Non-linear processing and reinforcement learning to predict rTMS treatment response in depression

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Elias Ebrahimzadeh , Amin Dehghani , Mostafa Asgarinejad , Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh
{"title":"Non-linear processing and reinforcement learning to predict rTMS treatment response in depression","authors":"Elias Ebrahimzadeh ,&nbsp;Amin Dehghani ,&nbsp;Mostafa Asgarinejad ,&nbsp;Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh","doi":"10.1016/j.pscychresns.2023.111764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Forecasting the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) therapy can lead to substantial time and cost savings by preventing futile treatments. To achieve this objective, we've formulated a machine learning approach aimed at categorizing patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) into two groups: individuals who respond (R) positively to rTMS treatment and those who do not respond (NR).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Preceding the commencement of treatment, we obtained resting-state EEG data from 106 patients diagnosed with MDD, employing 32 electrodes for data collection. These patients then underwent a 7-week course of rTMS therapy, and 54 of them exhibited positive responses to the treatment. Employing Independent Component Analysis (ICA) on the EEG data, we successfully pinpointed relevant brain sources that could potentially serve as markers of neural activity within the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). These identified sources were further scrutinized to estimate the sources of activity within the sensor domain. Then, we integrated supplementary physiological data and implemented specific criteria to yield more realistic estimations when compared to conventional EEG analysis. In the end, we selected components corresponding to the DLPFC region within the sensor domain. Features were derived from the time-series data of these relevant independent components. To identify the most significant features, we used Reinforcement Learning (RL). In categorizing patients into two groups – R and NR to rTMS treatment – we utilized three distinct classification algorithms including K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP). We assessed the performance of these classifiers through a ten-fold cross-validation method. Additionally, we conducted a statistical test to evaluate the discriminative capacity of these features between responders and non-responders, opening the door for further exploration in this field.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified EEG features that can anticipate the response to rTMS treatment. The most robust discriminators included EEG beta power, the sum of bispectrum diagonal elements in the delta and beta frequency bands. When these features were combined into a single vector, the classification of responders and non-responders achieved impressive performance, with an accuracy of 95.28 %, specificity at 94.23 %, sensitivity reaching 96.29 %, and precision standing at 94.54 %, all achieved using SVM.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results of this study suggest that the proposed approach, utilizing power, non-linear, and bispectral features extracted from relevant independent component time-series, has the capability to forecast the treatment outcome of rTMS for MDD patients based solely on a single pre-treatment EEG recording session. The achieved findings demonstrate the superior performance of our method compared to previous techniques.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20776,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging","volume":"337 ","pages":"Article 111764"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925492723001749","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Forecasting the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) therapy can lead to substantial time and cost savings by preventing futile treatments. To achieve this objective, we've formulated a machine learning approach aimed at categorizing patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) into two groups: individuals who respond (R) positively to rTMS treatment and those who do not respond (NR).

Methods

Preceding the commencement of treatment, we obtained resting-state EEG data from 106 patients diagnosed with MDD, employing 32 electrodes for data collection. These patients then underwent a 7-week course of rTMS therapy, and 54 of them exhibited positive responses to the treatment. Employing Independent Component Analysis (ICA) on the EEG data, we successfully pinpointed relevant brain sources that could potentially serve as markers of neural activity within the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). These identified sources were further scrutinized to estimate the sources of activity within the sensor domain. Then, we integrated supplementary physiological data and implemented specific criteria to yield more realistic estimations when compared to conventional EEG analysis. In the end, we selected components corresponding to the DLPFC region within the sensor domain. Features were derived from the time-series data of these relevant independent components. To identify the most significant features, we used Reinforcement Learning (RL). In categorizing patients into two groups – R and NR to rTMS treatment – we utilized three distinct classification algorithms including K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP). We assessed the performance of these classifiers through a ten-fold cross-validation method. Additionally, we conducted a statistical test to evaluate the discriminative capacity of these features between responders and non-responders, opening the door for further exploration in this field.

Results

We identified EEG features that can anticipate the response to rTMS treatment. The most robust discriminators included EEG beta power, the sum of bispectrum diagonal elements in the delta and beta frequency bands. When these features were combined into a single vector, the classification of responders and non-responders achieved impressive performance, with an accuracy of 95.28 %, specificity at 94.23 %, sensitivity reaching 96.29 %, and precision standing at 94.54 %, all achieved using SVM.

Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that the proposed approach, utilizing power, non-linear, and bispectral features extracted from relevant independent component time-series, has the capability to forecast the treatment outcome of rTMS for MDD patients based solely on a single pre-treatment EEG recording session. The achieved findings demonstrate the superior performance of our method compared to previous techniques.

Abstract Image

非线性处理和强化学习预测抑郁症的rTMS治疗反应
预测重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗的疗效可以通过防止无效的治疗来节省大量的时间和成本。为了实现这一目标,我们制定了一种机器学习方法,旨在将重度抑郁症(MDD)患者分为两组:对rTMS治疗有积极反应的个体(R)和无反应的个体(NR)。方法在治疗开始前,对106例重度抑郁症患者进行静息状态脑电数据采集,采用32个电极采集。这些患者随后接受了为期7周的rTMS治疗,其中54人对治疗表现出积极反应。通过对脑电图数据进行独立成分分析(ICA),我们成功地确定了相关的脑源,这些脑源可能作为背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)内神经活动的标志物。这些确定的来源被进一步仔细检查,以估计传感器域内的活动来源。然后,我们整合了补充的生理数据,并实施了特定的标准,与传统的脑电图分析相比,得出了更现实的估计。最后,我们选择了传感器域内DLPFC区域对应的组件。从这些相关独立分量的时间序列数据中导出特征。为了识别最重要的特征,我们使用了强化学习(RL)。在将患者分为两组- rTMS治疗的R和NR -我们使用了三种不同的分类算法,包括k -最近邻(KNN),支持向量机(SVM)和多层感知器(MLP)。我们通过十倍交叉验证方法评估了这些分类器的性能。此外,我们还进行了统计检验,以评估这些特征在响应者和非响应者之间的区分能力,为该领域的进一步探索打开了大门。结果我们确定了可以预测rTMS治疗反应的脑电图特征。鲁棒性最强的鉴别器包括EEG β功率、δ和β频段双谱对角线元素之和。当这些特征组合成一个单一的向量时,反应者和非反应者的分类取得了令人印象深刻的效果,使用SVM的准确率为95.28%,特异性为94.23%,灵敏度为96.29%,精度为94.54%。结论本研究结果表明,该方法利用从相关独立分量时间序列中提取的功率、非线性和双谱特征,能够仅根据单次治疗前脑电图记录来预测重度抑郁症患者的rTMS治疗结果。所取得的结果表明,与以前的技术相比,我们的方法具有优越的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
22.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Neuroimaging section of Psychiatry Research publishes manuscripts on positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, computerized electroencephalographic topography, regional cerebral blood flow, computed tomography, magnetoencephalography, autoradiography, post-mortem regional analyses, and other imaging techniques. Reports concerning results in psychiatric disorders, dementias, and the effects of behaviorial tasks and pharmacological treatments are featured. We also invite manuscripts on the methods of obtaining images and computer processing of the images themselves. Selected case reports are also published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信