Effects of antibiotic, acidifier, and probiotic supplementation on mortality rates, lipoprotein profile, and carcass traits of broiler chickens

IF 1.9 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Sabuj Kanti Nath , Md Taslim Hossain , Mahfuza Ferdous , Mst. Assrafi Siddika , Amir Hossain , Amim Al Maruf , Ahanaf Tahmid Chowdhory , Tilak Chandra Nath
{"title":"Effects of antibiotic, acidifier, and probiotic supplementation on mortality rates, lipoprotein profile, and carcass traits of broiler chickens","authors":"Sabuj Kanti Nath ,&nbsp;Md Taslim Hossain ,&nbsp;Mahfuza Ferdous ,&nbsp;Mst. Assrafi Siddika ,&nbsp;Amir Hossain ,&nbsp;Amim Al Maruf ,&nbsp;Ahanaf Tahmid Chowdhory ,&nbsp;Tilak Chandra Nath","doi":"10.1016/j.vas.2023.100325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Antimicrobial resistance is a significant issue, therefore it's relevant to assess the effects of antibiotics, acidifiers, and probiotic supplementation finding a good alternative to reduce the use of antibiotics in broiler production in rural areas of Bangladesh. Using randomized control trial, this 28-day study evaluated 360 Hubbard Classic broiler chicks divided into four groups: oxytetracycline-treated, acidifier-treated, Lactobacillus-based probiotic-treated, and control (no antibiotics, acidifiers, or probiotics). Each group was replicated three times with 30 birds each with adlibitum feeding. Body weight and feed intake were recorded weekly, and on 28th day, carcass traits and blood lipoprotein levels were evaluated. Results showed that in first and fourth weeks, the body weight gain significantly varied in probiotics and acidifier-treated birds than the control group (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The probiotic group had gained considerable increase in body weight (185.0 g vs 161.7 g and 1745.0 g vs 1592.7 g) than the control group. Notably, in the first week, the feed conversion ratio for the probiotic group was 0.76, but the antibiotic group's was 0.96 (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The weights of the drumstick (88.33 g) and liver (61.0 g) having probiotic supplements were substantially higher than those in the control group (77.0 g and 51.33 g, respectively) (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). According to serum lipoprotein analysis, the probiotic and acidifier groups exhibited lower LDL levels (71.1 mg/dl and 69.8 mg/dl, respectively) and higher triglyceride levels (122.9 mg/dl and 135.4 mg/dl). These findings highlight the potential of probiotics and acidifiers as effective antibiotic alternatives, promoting carcass traits and lowering LDL levels in broilers in Bangladesh.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37152,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary and Animal Science","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100325"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451943X2300042X/pdfft?md5=a4827e6a388ac9f3e67b699bdd8367c8&pid=1-s2.0-S2451943X2300042X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary and Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451943X2300042X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance is a significant issue, therefore it's relevant to assess the effects of antibiotics, acidifiers, and probiotic supplementation finding a good alternative to reduce the use of antibiotics in broiler production in rural areas of Bangladesh. Using randomized control trial, this 28-day study evaluated 360 Hubbard Classic broiler chicks divided into four groups: oxytetracycline-treated, acidifier-treated, Lactobacillus-based probiotic-treated, and control (no antibiotics, acidifiers, or probiotics). Each group was replicated three times with 30 birds each with adlibitum feeding. Body weight and feed intake were recorded weekly, and on 28th day, carcass traits and blood lipoprotein levels were evaluated. Results showed that in first and fourth weeks, the body weight gain significantly varied in probiotics and acidifier-treated birds than the control group (P < 0.001). The probiotic group had gained considerable increase in body weight (185.0 g vs 161.7 g and 1745.0 g vs 1592.7 g) than the control group. Notably, in the first week, the feed conversion ratio for the probiotic group was 0.76, but the antibiotic group's was 0.96 (P < 0.001). The weights of the drumstick (88.33 g) and liver (61.0 g) having probiotic supplements were substantially higher than those in the control group (77.0 g and 51.33 g, respectively) (P < 0.001). According to serum lipoprotein analysis, the probiotic and acidifier groups exhibited lower LDL levels (71.1 mg/dl and 69.8 mg/dl, respectively) and higher triglyceride levels (122.9 mg/dl and 135.4 mg/dl). These findings highlight the potential of probiotics and acidifiers as effective antibiotic alternatives, promoting carcass traits and lowering LDL levels in broilers in Bangladesh.

添加抗生素、酸化剂和益生菌对肉鸡死亡率、脂蛋白谱和胴体性状的影响
抗菌素耐药性是一个重要问题,因此评估抗生素、酸化剂和益生菌补充剂的效果,找到一种良好的替代品,以减少孟加拉国农村地区肉鸡生产中抗生素的使用,是有意义的。采用随机对照试验,将360只哈伯德经典肉鸡分为四组:土霉素组、酸化剂组、以乳酸杆菌为基础的益生菌组和对照组(不含抗生素、酸化剂或益生菌)。每组重复3次,每组30只,不固定饲养。每周记录体重和采食量,第28天评价胴体性状和血脂水平。结果表明,在第1周和第4周,益生菌组和酸化剂处理组的体重增加显著高于对照组(P <0.001)。与对照组相比,益生菌组的体重显著增加(185.0 g vs 161.7 g, 1745.0 g vs 1592.7 g)。值得注意的是,在第1周,益生菌组的饲料系数为0.76,抗生素组为0.96 (P <0.001)。添加益生菌的鸡腿重量(88.33 g)和肝脏重量(61.0 g)显著高于对照组(分别为77.0 g和51.33 g) (P <0.001)。根据血清脂蛋白分析,益生菌组和酸化剂组LDL水平较低(分别为71.1 mg/dl和69.8 mg/dl),甘油三酯水平较高(122.9 mg/dl和135.4 mg/dl)。这些发现突出了益生菌和酸化剂作为有效抗生素替代品的潜力,在孟加拉国肉鸡中促进胴体性状和降低低密度脂蛋白水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary and Animal Science
Veterinary and Animal Science Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
47 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信