Is the Symmetry of Classical Ballet Positions Perfect?

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Joanna Gorwa, Jarosław Kabaciński, Michał Murawa, Wiktoria Śpikowska-Pawelec, Anna Fryzowicz
{"title":"Is the Symmetry of Classical Ballet Positions Perfect?","authors":"Joanna Gorwa, Jarosław Kabaciński, Michał Murawa, Wiktoria Śpikowska-Pawelec, Anna Fryzowicz","doi":"10.21091/mppa.2023.4024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>It is expected that in classical ballet dancers would be able to execute all the techniques symmetrically from the right as well as from the left side of the body. This study aimed to evaluate the symmetry of kinematic parameters of hip joints, knee joints, and foot progression angle of the left and right lower extremities (LE) in five classical ballet positions, as well as the symmetry of active and passive turnout and range of passive hip external rotation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The experimental testing involved 12 female pre-professional ballet dancers. Three measurements of range of motion, made using a standard goniometer, were carried out to characterize the study group. Kinematic data of left and right LE in the five classical ballet positions were recorded using a motion capture system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The comparisons revealed significantly lower (p < 0.01) hip external rotation values by 9.8% (1st position), 5.4% (2nd position), and 8.5-11.8% (3rd position) for the right LE than the left LE. Moreover for 3rd, 4th and 5th positions, there was significantly higher (p < 0.05) hip external rotation values by 7.0%-27.2% in the back LE than the front LE. In 4th position there was asymmetry in foot progression angle with significantly lower values (p < 0.01) by 5.3% in the front LE (left) than the back LE (right). In case of goniometric measurements, the results showed significantly higher (p < 0.05) passive hip external rotation values by 10.8% for the right LE than the left LE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The perfect ballet symmetry pursued by dancers is not in fact so ideal. The most astonishing result was the existence of statistically significant differences in hip external rotation in the case of the 1st and 2nd positions.</p>","PeriodicalId":18336,"journal":{"name":"Medical problems of performing artists","volume":"38 4","pages":"200-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical problems of performing artists","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21091/mppa.2023.4024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: It is expected that in classical ballet dancers would be able to execute all the techniques symmetrically from the right as well as from the left side of the body. This study aimed to evaluate the symmetry of kinematic parameters of hip joints, knee joints, and foot progression angle of the left and right lower extremities (LE) in five classical ballet positions, as well as the symmetry of active and passive turnout and range of passive hip external rotation.

Methods: The experimental testing involved 12 female pre-professional ballet dancers. Three measurements of range of motion, made using a standard goniometer, were carried out to characterize the study group. Kinematic data of left and right LE in the five classical ballet positions were recorded using a motion capture system.

Results: The comparisons revealed significantly lower (p < 0.01) hip external rotation values by 9.8% (1st position), 5.4% (2nd position), and 8.5-11.8% (3rd position) for the right LE than the left LE. Moreover for 3rd, 4th and 5th positions, there was significantly higher (p < 0.05) hip external rotation values by 7.0%-27.2% in the back LE than the front LE. In 4th position there was asymmetry in foot progression angle with significantly lower values (p < 0.01) by 5.3% in the front LE (left) than the back LE (right). In case of goniometric measurements, the results showed significantly higher (p < 0.05) passive hip external rotation values by 10.8% for the right LE than the left LE.

Conclusion: The perfect ballet symmetry pursued by dancers is not in fact so ideal. The most astonishing result was the existence of statistically significant differences in hip external rotation in the case of the 1st and 2nd positions.

古典芭蕾舞姿的对称完美吗?
目的:期望在古典芭蕾中,舞者能够从身体的右侧和左侧对称地执行所有的技术。本研究旨在评价五种古典芭蕾体位中左右下肢髋关节、膝关节运动学参数、足部进位角的对称性,以及主动和被动髋关节外旋范围的对称性。方法:对12名女职业前芭蕾舞演员进行实验测试。使用标准测角仪进行了三次运动范围测量,以确定研究组的特征。利用运动捕捉系统记录了五种古典芭蕾体位的左右LE运动数据。结果:与左LE相比,右LE的髋外旋值分别降低9.8%(第1位)、5.4%(第2位)和8.5-11.8%(第3位),差异有统计学意义(p < 0.01)。对于第3、4、5位,髋后位髋外旋值比髋前位髋外旋值高7.0% ~ 27.2% (p < 0.05)。在第4位,足部前进角不对称,前LE(左)比后LE(右)低5.3% (p < 0.01)。在角度测量的情况下,结果显示右侧LE的被动髋关节外旋值比左侧LE高10.8% (p < 0.05)。结论:舞者所追求的完美的芭蕾对称其实并不那么理想。最令人惊讶的结果是,在第1位和第2位的情况下,髋关节外旋存在统计学上的显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
28
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Problems of Performing Artists is the first clinical medical journal devoted to the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of medical and psychological disorders related to the performing arts. Original peer-reviewed research papers cover topics including neurologic disorders, musculoskeletal conditions, voice and hearing disorders, anxieties, stress, substance abuse, and other health issues related to actors, dancers, singers, musicians, and other performers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信