Filippo Maria Cauti, Pietro Rossi, Stefano Bianchi, Michele Magnocavallo, Silvia Capone, Domenico Giovanni Della Rocca, Marco Polselli, Katia Bruno, Pierfrancesco Tozzi, Chiara Rossi, Jacopo Vannucci, Francesco Pugliese, Raffaele Quaglione, Federico Venuta, Marco Anile
{"title":"Modified sympathicotomy in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia and structural heart disease: a single-center experience.","authors":"Filippo Maria Cauti, Pietro Rossi, Stefano Bianchi, Michele Magnocavallo, Silvia Capone, Domenico Giovanni Della Rocca, Marco Polselli, Katia Bruno, Pierfrancesco Tozzi, Chiara Rossi, Jacopo Vannucci, Francesco Pugliese, Raffaele Quaglione, Federico Venuta, Marco Anile","doi":"10.1007/s10840-023-01706-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Modified cardiac sympathetic denervation (CSD) with stellate ganglion (SG) sparing is a novel technique for cardiac neuromodulation in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our aim is to describe the mid- to long-term clinical outcome of the modified CSD with SG sparing in a series of patients with structural heart disease (SHD) and refractory VT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All consecutive patients with SHD and refractory VT undergoing modified CSD were enrolled. Baseline clinical characteristics and periprocedural data were collected for all patients. The primary outcome was any recurrence of sustained VT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 15 patients (age: 69.2 ± 7.9 years; male 100%) undergoing modified CSD. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 37 ± 11% and all patients had an implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD); the underlying cardiomyopathy was non-ischemic in 73.3% of them. At least one previous ablation had been attempted in 66.6% of cases. The 73.3% of patients underwent bilateral CSD and the mean effective surgical time was 10.8 ± 2.4 min per side; no major periprocedural complication occurred. After a median follow-up time of 15 months (IQR: 8.5-24.5 months), the primary outcome occurred in 47.6% of cases. All patients experienced a reduction of ICD shocks after CSD (3.1 ICD shocks/patient before vs. 0.3 ICD shocks/patient after CSD; p-value: 0.001). Bilateral CSD and a VT cycle length < 340 ms were associated with better outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A modified CSD approach with stellate ganglion sparing appears to be safe, fast, and effective in the treatment of patients with SHD and refractory VTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"391-399"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-023-01706-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Modified cardiac sympathetic denervation (CSD) with stellate ganglion (SG) sparing is a novel technique for cardiac neuromodulation in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT).
Objectives: Our aim is to describe the mid- to long-term clinical outcome of the modified CSD with SG sparing in a series of patients with structural heart disease (SHD) and refractory VT.
Methods: All consecutive patients with SHD and refractory VT undergoing modified CSD were enrolled. Baseline clinical characteristics and periprocedural data were collected for all patients. The primary outcome was any recurrence of sustained VT.
Results: We enrolled 15 patients (age: 69.2 ± 7.9 years; male 100%) undergoing modified CSD. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 37 ± 11% and all patients had an implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD); the underlying cardiomyopathy was non-ischemic in 73.3% of them. At least one previous ablation had been attempted in 66.6% of cases. The 73.3% of patients underwent bilateral CSD and the mean effective surgical time was 10.8 ± 2.4 min per side; no major periprocedural complication occurred. After a median follow-up time of 15 months (IQR: 8.5-24.5 months), the primary outcome occurred in 47.6% of cases. All patients experienced a reduction of ICD shocks after CSD (3.1 ICD shocks/patient before vs. 0.3 ICD shocks/patient after CSD; p-value: 0.001). Bilateral CSD and a VT cycle length < 340 ms were associated with better outcomes.
Conclusions: A modified CSD approach with stellate ganglion sparing appears to be safe, fast, and effective in the treatment of patients with SHD and refractory VTs.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology is an international publication devoted to fostering research in and development of interventional techniques and therapies for the management of cardiac arrhythmias. It is designed primarily to present original research studies and scholarly scientific reviews of basic and applied science and clinical research in this field. The Journal will adopt a multidisciplinary approach to link physical, experimental, and clinical sciences as applied to the development of and practice in interventional electrophysiology. The Journal will examine techniques ranging from molecular, chemical and pharmacologic therapies to device and ablation technology. Accordingly, original research in clinical, epidemiologic and basic science arenas will be considered for publication. Applied engineering or physical science studies pertaining to interventional electrophysiology will be encouraged. The Journal is committed to providing comprehensive and detailed treatment of major interventional therapies and innovative techniques in a structured and clinically relevant manner. It is directed at clinical practitioners and investigators in the rapidly growing field of interventional electrophysiology. The editorial staff and board reflect this bias and include noted international experts in this area with a wealth of expertise in basic and clinical investigation. Peer review of all submissions, conflict of interest guidelines and periodic editorial board review of all Journal policies have been established.