Modified sympathicotomy in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia and structural heart disease: a single-center experience.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Filippo Maria Cauti, Pietro Rossi, Stefano Bianchi, Michele Magnocavallo, Silvia Capone, Domenico Giovanni Della Rocca, Marco Polselli, Katia Bruno, Pierfrancesco Tozzi, Chiara Rossi, Jacopo Vannucci, Francesco Pugliese, Raffaele Quaglione, Federico Venuta, Marco Anile
{"title":"Modified sympathicotomy in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia and structural heart disease: a single-center experience.","authors":"Filippo Maria Cauti, Pietro Rossi, Stefano Bianchi, Michele Magnocavallo, Silvia Capone, Domenico Giovanni Della Rocca, Marco Polselli, Katia Bruno, Pierfrancesco Tozzi, Chiara Rossi, Jacopo Vannucci, Francesco Pugliese, Raffaele Quaglione, Federico Venuta, Marco Anile","doi":"10.1007/s10840-023-01706-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Modified cardiac sympathetic denervation (CSD) with stellate ganglion (SG) sparing is a novel technique for cardiac neuromodulation in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our aim is to describe the mid- to long-term clinical outcome of the modified CSD with SG sparing in a series of patients with structural heart disease (SHD) and refractory VT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All consecutive patients with SHD and refractory VT undergoing modified CSD were enrolled. Baseline clinical characteristics and periprocedural data were collected for all patients. The primary outcome was any recurrence of sustained VT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 15 patients (age: 69.2 ± 7.9 years; male 100%) undergoing modified CSD. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 37 ± 11% and all patients had an implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD); the underlying cardiomyopathy was non-ischemic in 73.3% of them. At least one previous ablation had been attempted in 66.6% of cases. The 73.3% of patients underwent bilateral CSD and the mean effective surgical time was 10.8 ± 2.4 min per side; no major periprocedural complication occurred. After a median follow-up time of 15 months (IQR: 8.5-24.5 months), the primary outcome occurred in 47.6% of cases. All patients experienced a reduction of ICD shocks after CSD (3.1 ICD shocks/patient before vs. 0.3 ICD shocks/patient after CSD; p-value: 0.001). Bilateral CSD and a VT cycle length < 340 ms were associated with better outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A modified CSD approach with stellate ganglion sparing appears to be safe, fast, and effective in the treatment of patients with SHD and refractory VTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"391-399"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-023-01706-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Modified cardiac sympathetic denervation (CSD) with stellate ganglion (SG) sparing is a novel technique for cardiac neuromodulation in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT).

Objectives: Our aim is to describe the mid- to long-term clinical outcome of the modified CSD with SG sparing in a series of patients with structural heart disease (SHD) and refractory VT.

Methods: All consecutive patients with SHD and refractory VT undergoing modified CSD were enrolled. Baseline clinical characteristics and periprocedural data were collected for all patients. The primary outcome was any recurrence of sustained VT.

Results: We enrolled 15 patients (age: 69.2 ± 7.9 years; male 100%) undergoing modified CSD. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 37 ± 11% and all patients had an implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD); the underlying cardiomyopathy was non-ischemic in 73.3% of them. At least one previous ablation had been attempted in 66.6% of cases. The 73.3% of patients underwent bilateral CSD and the mean effective surgical time was 10.8 ± 2.4 min per side; no major periprocedural complication occurred. After a median follow-up time of 15 months (IQR: 8.5-24.5 months), the primary outcome occurred in 47.6% of cases. All patients experienced a reduction of ICD shocks after CSD (3.1 ICD shocks/patient before vs. 0.3 ICD shocks/patient after CSD; p-value: 0.001). Bilateral CSD and a VT cycle length < 340 ms were associated with better outcomes.

Conclusions: A modified CSD approach with stellate ganglion sparing appears to be safe, fast, and effective in the treatment of patients with SHD and refractory VTs.

Abstract Image

改良交感神经切开术治疗难治性室性心动过速和结构性心脏病:单中心经验
背景:保留星状神经节(SG)的改良心脏交感神经去支配(CSD)是一种治疗难治性室性心动过速(VT)患者心脏神经调节的新技术。目的:我们的目的是描述具有SG保留的改良CSD在一系列结构性心脏病(SHD)和难治性VT患者中的中长期临床结果。方法:所有连续接受改良CSD的SHD和难治性VT患者均入组。收集所有患者的基线临床特征和围手术期数据。主要结局是持续性vt的复发。结果:我们入组了15例患者(年龄:69.2±7.9岁;男性100%)正在接受改良的CSD。左心室射血分数为37±11%,所有患者均有植入式心脏除颤器(ICD);其中73.3%为非缺血性心肌病。66.6%的病例至少曾尝试过一次消融。73.3%的患者行双侧CSD,平均有效手术时间为每侧10.8±2.4 min;无重大围手术期并发症发生。中位随访15个月(IQR: 8.5-24.5个月)后,47.6%的病例出现了主要结局。所有患者在CSD后都经历了ICD电击减少(CSD前ICD电击3.1次/患者vs. CSD后ICD电击0.3次/患者;假定值:0.001)。结论:保留星状神经节的改良CSD入路在治疗SHD和难治性室性血栓患者中是安全、快速和有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
320
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology is an international publication devoted to fostering research in and development of interventional techniques and therapies for the management of cardiac arrhythmias. It is designed primarily to present original research studies and scholarly scientific reviews of basic and applied science and clinical research in this field. The Journal will adopt a multidisciplinary approach to link physical, experimental, and clinical sciences as applied to the development of and practice in interventional electrophysiology. The Journal will examine techniques ranging from molecular, chemical and pharmacologic therapies to device and ablation technology. Accordingly, original research in clinical, epidemiologic and basic science arenas will be considered for publication. Applied engineering or physical science studies pertaining to interventional electrophysiology will be encouraged. The Journal is committed to providing comprehensive and detailed treatment of major interventional therapies and innovative techniques in a structured and clinically relevant manner. It is directed at clinical practitioners and investigators in the rapidly growing field of interventional electrophysiology. The editorial staff and board reflect this bias and include noted international experts in this area with a wealth of expertise in basic and clinical investigation. Peer review of all submissions, conflict of interest guidelines and periodic editorial board review of all Journal policies have been established.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信