Self-efficacy, stress, and symptoms of depression and anxiety in adolescents: An epidemiological cohort study with ecological momentary assessment

Sophia Fürtjes , Catharina Voss , Frank Rückert , Stephanie K.V. Peschel , Hanna Kische , Theresa M. Ollmann , Johanna Berwanger , Katja Beesdo-Baum
{"title":"Self-efficacy, stress, and symptoms of depression and anxiety in adolescents: An epidemiological cohort study with ecological momentary assessment","authors":"Sophia Fürtjes ,&nbsp;Catharina Voss ,&nbsp;Frank Rückert ,&nbsp;Stephanie K.V. Peschel ,&nbsp;Hanna Kische ,&nbsp;Theresa M. Ollmann ,&nbsp;Johanna Berwanger ,&nbsp;Katja Beesdo-Baum","doi":"10.1016/j.xjmad.2023.100039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Self-efficacy (confidence in one’s abilities to execute behavior to reach ones goals) has been reported to reduce the impact of stress on symptoms of depression and anxiety. However, findings have been inconsistent regarding the two different conditions and the temporal resolution (individual situations [micro-level] vs. general disposition [macro-level], cross-sectional vs. longitudinal). By analyzing available data from an epidemiological cohort study, we explored the impact of self-efficacy, stress, and their interaction on symptoms of depression and anxiety in <em>N</em> = 1072 adolescents (age 14–21) from the general population. We conducted questionnaire assessments (macro-level) and ecological momentary assessment (EMA; micro-level). Multiple linear regressions and hierarchical linear modeling were applied to explore cross-sectional and longitudinal associations on both levels. On the micro-level, cross-sectional results indicate that self-efficacy lowers the impact of stress on depression, but not anxiety, during everyday life. Longitudinal effects were not found. On the macro-level, cross-sectional analyses revealed a buffering effect of self-efficacy against stress for anxiety, but not depression. Longitudinally, only direct effects could be observed for self-efficacy on anxiety and for stress on depression and anxiety. It appears that the adverse impact of stress on depression might be too strong to be buffered by self-efficacy in general, but only on a micro-level. The macro-level protective effect of self-efficacy regarding anxiety on the other hand might not be retrievable during everyday life. Results imply that therapy of depression might benefit from strategies to lower stress, whereas treatment of anxiety might focus on increasing self-efficacy to reduce avoidant behavior.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73841,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100039"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950004423000391/pdfft?md5=2094225bb4170224c5821c45d1e845db&pid=1-s2.0-S2950004423000391-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950004423000391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Self-efficacy (confidence in one’s abilities to execute behavior to reach ones goals) has been reported to reduce the impact of stress on symptoms of depression and anxiety. However, findings have been inconsistent regarding the two different conditions and the temporal resolution (individual situations [micro-level] vs. general disposition [macro-level], cross-sectional vs. longitudinal). By analyzing available data from an epidemiological cohort study, we explored the impact of self-efficacy, stress, and their interaction on symptoms of depression and anxiety in N = 1072 adolescents (age 14–21) from the general population. We conducted questionnaire assessments (macro-level) and ecological momentary assessment (EMA; micro-level). Multiple linear regressions and hierarchical linear modeling were applied to explore cross-sectional and longitudinal associations on both levels. On the micro-level, cross-sectional results indicate that self-efficacy lowers the impact of stress on depression, but not anxiety, during everyday life. Longitudinal effects were not found. On the macro-level, cross-sectional analyses revealed a buffering effect of self-efficacy against stress for anxiety, but not depression. Longitudinally, only direct effects could be observed for self-efficacy on anxiety and for stress on depression and anxiety. It appears that the adverse impact of stress on depression might be too strong to be buffered by self-efficacy in general, but only on a micro-level. The macro-level protective effect of self-efficacy regarding anxiety on the other hand might not be retrievable during everyday life. Results imply that therapy of depression might benefit from strategies to lower stress, whereas treatment of anxiety might focus on increasing self-efficacy to reduce avoidant behavior.

青少年自我效能、压力、抑郁和焦虑症状:一项生态瞬时评估的流行病学队列研究
据报道,自我效能(对一个人执行行为以达到目标的能力的信心)可以减少压力对抑郁和焦虑症状的影响。然而,关于两种不同的条件和时间分辨率(个体情况[微观层面]与一般倾向[宏观层面],横断面与纵向)的研究结果并不一致。通过分析流行病学队列研究的现有数据,我们探讨了自我效能感、压力及其相互作用对普通人群中N = 1072名青少年(14-21岁)抑郁和焦虑症状的影响。我们进行了问卷评估(宏观层面)和生态瞬间评估(EMA;微观层面)。采用多元线性回归和分层线性模型来探讨这两个水平的横断面和纵向关联。在微观层面上,横断面研究结果表明,在日常生活中,自我效能降低了压力对抑郁的影响,而不是焦虑。未发现纵向效应。在宏观层面上,横断面分析揭示了自我效能对焦虑压力的缓冲作用,但对抑郁没有。纵向上,只能观察到自我效能对焦虑的直接影响,以及压力对抑郁和焦虑的直接影响。总的来说,压力对抑郁的负面影响似乎太过强烈,无法被自我效能所缓冲,但这只是在微观层面上。另一方面,自我效能对焦虑的宏观保护作用在日常生活中可能无法恢复。结果表明,抑郁症的治疗可能受益于降低压力的策略,而焦虑的治疗可能侧重于提高自我效能以减少回避行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of mood and anxiety disorders
Journal of mood and anxiety disorders Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General), Behavioral Neuroscience
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信