Ethnopedology, its evolution and perspectives in soil security: A review

Georgina Pérez-Rodríguez, Carlos Alberto Ortiz-Solorio, Ma. del Carmen Gutiérrez-Castorena
{"title":"Ethnopedology, its evolution and perspectives in soil security: A review","authors":"Georgina Pérez-Rodríguez,&nbsp;Carlos Alberto Ortiz-Solorio,&nbsp;Ma. del Carmen Gutiérrez-Castorena","doi":"10.1016/j.soisec.2023.100121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This review examines how Ethnopedology has developed over the last 23 years. It considers its role in soil security and knowledge co-production. Due to its constant interaction with the surrounding environment, indigenous or peasant soil knowledge is detailed, holistic, intergenerational, and even millennia-old. Farmer´s knowledge concerns about climate change, land degradation, soil conservation, sustainable agriculture, and agricultural production constraints have been recently demonstrated. However, this ethnoscience remains marginalised in university curricula, the production of scientific papers, and decision-making. In order to address the major global challenges facing humanity, Soil Security proposes the holistic assessment of soil through five dimensions: capacity, condition, capital, codification, and connectivity; the latter relates the environment to society but is the least developed. The other proposal is the co-production of knowledge, which implies collaboration between technicians and producers to achieve soil development. Integrating Ethnopedology with connectivity studies and the co-production of knowledge can contribute to Soil Security studies and soil sustainability. However, it is necessary to maintain an equal role in knowledge integration. This process should be socially and academically inclusive and always recognise the value of local soil knowledge in solving critical environmental problems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74839,"journal":{"name":"Soil security","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006223000382/pdfft?md5=2779fbfb3fc66f03cc1ab5fe34c277d5&pid=1-s2.0-S2667006223000382-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006223000382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This review examines how Ethnopedology has developed over the last 23 years. It considers its role in soil security and knowledge co-production. Due to its constant interaction with the surrounding environment, indigenous or peasant soil knowledge is detailed, holistic, intergenerational, and even millennia-old. Farmer´s knowledge concerns about climate change, land degradation, soil conservation, sustainable agriculture, and agricultural production constraints have been recently demonstrated. However, this ethnoscience remains marginalised in university curricula, the production of scientific papers, and decision-making. In order to address the major global challenges facing humanity, Soil Security proposes the holistic assessment of soil through five dimensions: capacity, condition, capital, codification, and connectivity; the latter relates the environment to society but is the least developed. The other proposal is the co-production of knowledge, which implies collaboration between technicians and producers to achieve soil development. Integrating Ethnopedology with connectivity studies and the co-production of knowledge can contribute to Soil Security studies and soil sustainability. However, it is necessary to maintain an equal role in knowledge integration. This process should be socially and academically inclusive and always recognise the value of local soil knowledge in solving critical environmental problems.

民族学及其在土壤安全研究中的演变与展望
本文回顾了民族学在过去23年中是如何发展的。它考虑了它在土壤安全和知识合作生产中的作用。由于其与周围环境的不断互动,土著或农民的土壤知识是详细的,整体的,代际的,甚至是千年的。农民对气候变化、土地退化、土壤保持、可持续农业和农业生产限制的知识担忧最近得到了证明。然而,这种民族科学在大学课程、科学论文的制作和决策中仍然被边缘化。为应对人类面临的重大全球挑战,《土壤安全》建议从五个维度对土壤进行全面评估:能力、条件、资本、法典化和连通性;后者将环境与社会联系起来,但是最不发达的。另一个建议是知识的共同生产,这意味着技术人员和生产者之间的合作,以实现土壤开发。将人种学与连通性研究和知识的共同生产相结合,有助于土壤安全研究和土壤可持续性。然而,在知识整合中保持平等的角色是必要的。这一过程应该具有社会和学术包容性,并始终认识到当地土壤知识在解决关键环境问题方面的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil security
Soil security Soil Science
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
90 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信