Assessing different sampling regimens for estimating dietary characteristics using internal markers⁎

IF 1.4 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
M.R. Beck , PAS, J.A. Proctor , J.K. Smith , V.N. Gouvêa , Z. Kasuske , A.P. Foote , S.A. Gunter , PAS, P.A. Beck , PAS
{"title":"Assessing different sampling regimens for estimating dietary characteristics using internal markers⁎","authors":"M.R. Beck ,&nbsp;PAS,&nbsp;J.A. Proctor ,&nbsp;J.K. Smith ,&nbsp;V.N. Gouvêa ,&nbsp;Z. Kasuske ,&nbsp;A.P. Foote ,&nbsp;S.A. Gunter ,&nbsp;PAS,&nbsp;P.A. Beck ,&nbsp;PAS","doi":"10.15232/aas.2023-02452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The objectives of this experiment were to optimize fecal sample protocols using internal markers (acid detergent insoluble ash [ADIA], indigestible NDF [INDF] and ADF [IADF]) to estimate DM digestibility (DMD), CP digestibility (CPD), and DE.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Steers (n = 6; 754 ± 20.5 kg of BW) used in this experiment were housed in individual pens and were fed a starter and finisher diet in 2 periods. Fecal bags were fitted to steers for 4 d during each period. Fecal samples were collected every 12 h for 2 d. The fecal sampling regimens evaluated were (1) one sample collected on one morning (AM-1d); (2) samples collected on 2 mornings (AM-2d); (3) a morning and evening sample collected on 1 d (AM&amp;PM-1d); or (4) a morning and evening sample collected on 2 d (AM&amp;PM-2d).</p></div><div><h3>Results and Discussion</h3><p>The ADIA marker was found to be inadequate under the current experimental and this was largely driven by improvements in precision rather than accuracy.</p></div><div><h3>Implications and Applications</h3><p>Researchers will need to determine whether the improvements in method precision are worth the increased requirements in labor, time, and animal handling. This decision should be driven by experimental design limitations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8519,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286523000666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The objectives of this experiment were to optimize fecal sample protocols using internal markers (acid detergent insoluble ash [ADIA], indigestible NDF [INDF] and ADF [IADF]) to estimate DM digestibility (DMD), CP digestibility (CPD), and DE.

Materials and Methods

Steers (n = 6; 754 ± 20.5 kg of BW) used in this experiment were housed in individual pens and were fed a starter and finisher diet in 2 periods. Fecal bags were fitted to steers for 4 d during each period. Fecal samples were collected every 12 h for 2 d. The fecal sampling regimens evaluated were (1) one sample collected on one morning (AM-1d); (2) samples collected on 2 mornings (AM-2d); (3) a morning and evening sample collected on 1 d (AM&PM-1d); or (4) a morning and evening sample collected on 2 d (AM&PM-2d).

Results and Discussion

The ADIA marker was found to be inadequate under the current experimental and this was largely driven by improvements in precision rather than accuracy.

Implications and Applications

Researchers will need to determine whether the improvements in method precision are worth the increased requirements in labor, time, and animal handling. This decision should be driven by experimental design limitations.

评估使用内部标记物评估膳食特征的不同采样方案
本试验的目的是利用内部标记物(酸性洗涤不溶性灰分[ADIA]、不消化NDF [INDF]和ADF [IADF])优化粪便样品方案,以估计DM消化率(DMD)、CP消化率(CPD)和de。试验体重(754±20.5 kg),单栏饲养,分2期饲喂前、末饲粮。每期饲喂4 d粪袋。每12 h采集一次粪便样本,持续2 d。评估的粪便采样方案为:(1)1个上午(AM-1d)采集一个样本;(2) 2个上午(AM-2d)采集样本;(3) 1d的早晚采样(AM&PM-1d);或(4)在第二天早上和晚上采集样本(上午和下午2点)。结果和讨论在目前的实验中发现ADIA标记是不充分的,这主要是由于精度而不是准确性的提高。研究人员将需要确定方法精度的提高是否值得增加劳动力、时间和动物处理的要求。这一决定应受到实验设计限制的推动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Animal Science
Applied Animal Science AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
68
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信