Investigating the Relationship Between COVID-19 and Celiac Disease. A Dual Research Approach.

JPGN reports Pub Date : 2023-08-16 eCollection Date: 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1097/PG9.0000000000000340
Claudio Tiberti, Margherita Bonamico, Raffaella Nenna, Laura Petrarca, Chiara Maria Trovato, Nicoletta Pietropaoli, Valeria Fassino, Fabio Midulla, Andrea Lenzi, Salvatore Oliva, Monica Montuori
{"title":"Investigating the Relationship Between COVID-19 and Celiac Disease. A Dual Research Approach.","authors":"Claudio Tiberti, Margherita Bonamico, Raffaella Nenna, Laura Petrarca, Chiara Maria Trovato, Nicoletta Pietropaoli, Valeria Fassino, Fabio Midulla, Andrea Lenzi, Salvatore Oliva, Monica Montuori","doi":"10.1097/PG9.0000000000000340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most evidence on the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, has been obtained from web- or telephone-based surveys. In particular, few laboratory data, often incomplete, have been reported on the frequency of COVID-19-related serology at celiac disease (CD) diagnosis or on the effects of COVID-19 on the development of CD-specific autoimmunity.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this retrospective cross-sectional case/control study was to: (1) evaluate the frequency of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies in 78 children and adolescents at CD diagnosis (CD, 44 females, median age 7.4 years); (2) evaluate the frequency of IgA-anti-transglutaminase antibodies (IgA-tTGAbs) in 97 nonceliac patients (50 females, median age 9.0 years) who contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection during the pandemic (February-April 2021). As a control (CTRL) group, we analyzed 141 healthy subjects (79 females, median age 9.8 years) enrolled during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SARS-CoV-2 IgM- and IgG-antibodies were detected by chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassays. IgA-tTGAbs were detected by a fluid-phase radioimmunoassay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six out of 78 (7.7%) CD patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2Abs, with a frequency not significantly different from CTRL subjects (9.2%). None of the 97 nonceliac COVID-19 patients tested positive for IgA-tTG antibodies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These 2 distinct research approaches showed (1) similar frequencies of SARS-CoV-2 immunoreactivities in CD patients and CTRL subjects and, (2) no ability of SARS-CoV-2 to induce a CD-specific immune response, at least in the 3-4 months following SARS-CoV-2 infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":501015,"journal":{"name":"JPGN reports","volume":"4 4","pages":"e340"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10684164/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPGN reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PG9.0000000000000340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Most evidence on the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, has been obtained from web- or telephone-based surveys. In particular, few laboratory data, often incomplete, have been reported on the frequency of COVID-19-related serology at celiac disease (CD) diagnosis or on the effects of COVID-19 on the development of CD-specific autoimmunity.

Objectives: The objective of this retrospective cross-sectional case/control study was to: (1) evaluate the frequency of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies in 78 children and adolescents at CD diagnosis (CD, 44 females, median age 7.4 years); (2) evaluate the frequency of IgA-anti-transglutaminase antibodies (IgA-tTGAbs) in 97 nonceliac patients (50 females, median age 9.0 years) who contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection during the pandemic (February-April 2021). As a control (CTRL) group, we analyzed 141 healthy subjects (79 females, median age 9.8 years) enrolled during the pandemic.

Methods: SARS-CoV-2 IgM- and IgG-antibodies were detected by chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassays. IgA-tTGAbs were detected by a fluid-phase radioimmunoassay.

Results: Six out of 78 (7.7%) CD patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2Abs, with a frequency not significantly different from CTRL subjects (9.2%). None of the 97 nonceliac COVID-19 patients tested positive for IgA-tTG antibodies.

Conclusion: These 2 distinct research approaches showed (1) similar frequencies of SARS-CoV-2 immunoreactivities in CD patients and CTRL subjects and, (2) no ability of SARS-CoV-2 to induce a CD-specific immune response, at least in the 3-4 months following SARS-CoV-2 infection.

COVID-19与乳糜泻关系的研究双重研究方法。
背景:关于2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行的大多数证据来自网络或电话调查。特别是,在乳糜泻(CD)诊断中COVID-19相关血清学的频率或COVID-19对CD特异性自身免疫发展的影响方面,很少有实验室数据(往往不完整)被报道。目的:本回顾性横断面病例/对照研究的目的是:(1)评估78例诊断为乳糜泻的儿童和青少年(乳糜泻,44例女性,中位年龄7.4岁)中出现严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)抗体的频率;(2)评估在SARS-CoV-2大流行期间(2021年2月- 4月)感染的97例非乳糜泻患者(女性50例,中位年龄9.0岁)iga -抗谷氨酰胺酶抗体(IgA-tTGAbs)的频率。作为对照(CTRL)组,我们分析了大流行期间登记的141名健康受试者(79名女性,中位年龄9.8岁)。方法:采用化学发光微粒免疫法检测SARS-CoV-2的IgM抗体和igg抗体。采用液相放射免疫法检测IgA-tTGAbs。结果:78例CD患者中有6例(7.7%)检测出SARS-CoV-2Abs阳性,其频率与对照组(9.2%)无显著差异。97名非乳糜泻COVID-19患者的IgA-tTG抗体检测均未呈阳性。结论:这两种不同的研究方法显示:(1)在CD患者和对照组中,SARS-CoV-2免疫反应的频率相似;(2)至少在SARS-CoV-2感染后3-4个月内,SARS-CoV-2没有能力诱导CD特异性免疫反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信