Team-based learning in the internal medicine clerkship didactics

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Madeline Garb, Melissa Jenkins, Elaine Cruz
{"title":"Team-based learning in the internal medicine clerkship didactics","authors":"Madeline Garb,&nbsp;Melissa Jenkins,&nbsp;Elaine Cruz","doi":"10.1111/tct.13715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Active-learning approaches, such as team-based learning, are infrequently used in internal medicine clerkship didactics even though there is increasing evidence to suggest medical students prefer it over traditional lecture-based learning. In this study, five team-based learning sessions were incorporated into three blocks of a 12-week internal medicine clerkship.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The goal of this quasi-experimental study was to compare learner engagement, satisfaction and preference between team-based learning and lecture-based learning in the internal medicine clerkship didactics. Outcomes were compared using the Classroom Engagement Survey, a satisfaction questionnaire and the Team-Based Learning Student Assessment Instrument (TBL-SAI).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>There was a statistically significant difference in the classroom engagement scores between team- and lecture-based learning (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001) with a median of 39.0 and 33.0 in the team-based learning and lecture-based learning groups. For learning preference, the median TBL-SAI score was substantially above neutral. Across all team-based learning sessions, 100% of students were satisfied or strongly satisfied with the learning style as a valuable experience and as a way to learn course material, and only one student was not satisfied or strongly satisfied with team-based learning to improve problem solving skills.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>The classroom engagement and learning style preference findings were consistent with previously published data in other clerkship settings. Student satisfaction was more consistent with team-based learning than with the lecture-based learning, which may be because of the consistent format whereas lecture-based learning style was faculty dependent.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Students preferred team-based learning and had improved engagement and satisfaction when compared to lecture-based learning. This study provides evidence in favour of team-based learning as a strategy to incorporate active learning in clerkship didactics.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/tct.13715","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.13715","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Active-learning approaches, such as team-based learning, are infrequently used in internal medicine clerkship didactics even though there is increasing evidence to suggest medical students prefer it over traditional lecture-based learning. In this study, five team-based learning sessions were incorporated into three blocks of a 12-week internal medicine clerkship.

Methods

The goal of this quasi-experimental study was to compare learner engagement, satisfaction and preference between team-based learning and lecture-based learning in the internal medicine clerkship didactics. Outcomes were compared using the Classroom Engagement Survey, a satisfaction questionnaire and the Team-Based Learning Student Assessment Instrument (TBL-SAI).

Findings

There was a statistically significant difference in the classroom engagement scores between team- and lecture-based learning (P < 0.0001) with a median of 39.0 and 33.0 in the team-based learning and lecture-based learning groups. For learning preference, the median TBL-SAI score was substantially above neutral. Across all team-based learning sessions, 100% of students were satisfied or strongly satisfied with the learning style as a valuable experience and as a way to learn course material, and only one student was not satisfied or strongly satisfied with team-based learning to improve problem solving skills.

Discussion

The classroom engagement and learning style preference findings were consistent with previously published data in other clerkship settings. Student satisfaction was more consistent with team-based learning than with the lecture-based learning, which may be because of the consistent format whereas lecture-based learning style was faculty dependent.

Conclusion

Students preferred team-based learning and had improved engagement and satisfaction when compared to lecture-based learning. This study provides evidence in favour of team-based learning as a strategy to incorporate active learning in clerkship didactics.

Abstract Image

团队学习在内科见习教学中的应用。
背景:主动学习方法,如基于团队的学习,很少在内科实习教学中使用,尽管越来越多的证据表明医科学生更喜欢这种方法,而不是传统的基于讲座的学习。在这项研究中,五个以团队为基础的学习课程被纳入了为期12周的内科实习的三个模块。方法:采用准实验研究的方法,比较内科见习教学中团队式学习与课堂式学习的学习者投入度、满意度和学习偏好。使用课堂参与调查、满意度问卷和基于团队学习的学生评估工具(TBL-SAI)对结果进行比较。研究结果:课堂投入得分在以团队为基础的学习和以讲座为基础的学习之间存在统计学上的显著差异(P讨论:课堂投入和学习风格偏好的研究结果与先前发表的其他见习设置的数据一致。学生满意度与团队式学习比讲座式学习更一致,这可能是因为团队式学习的形式一致,而讲座式学习的风格则依赖于教师。结论:与授课式学习相比,学生更喜欢团队式学习,并有更高的参与度和满意度。本研究为支持以团队为基础的学习作为一种将主动学习纳入办事员教学的策略提供了证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信