Agreement Between the Gross Motor Ability Estimator-2 and the Gross Motor Ability Estimator-3 in Young Children With Cerebral Palsy.

IF 1.3 4区医学 Q3 PEDIATRICS

Pediatric Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-30 DOI:10.1097/PEP.0000000000001065

Samuel R Pierce, Julie Skorup, Thubi H A Kolobe, Beth A Smith, Laura A Prosser

{"title":"Agreement Between the Gross Motor Ability Estimator-2 and the Gross Motor Ability Estimator-3 in Young Children With Cerebral Palsy.","authors":"Samuel R Pierce, Julie Skorup, Thubi H A Kolobe, Beth A Smith, Laura A Prosser","doi":"10.1097/PEP.0000000000001065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the agreement between Gross Motor Ability Estimator-2 (GMAE-2) and Gross Motor Ability Estimator-3 (GMAE-3) calculations of Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (GMFM-66) scores in infants and young children with cerebral palsy.Methods: Data from 53 children 5 to 53 months of age were analyzed. Agreement between GMFM-66 scores using the GMAE-2 and the GMAE-3 was calculated using Bland-Altman plots and interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Eleven participants who had at least 1 GMFM-66 score of less than 25 using either method were identified for further analysis.Results: The average difference between GMFM-66 scores was 0.27 for all participants and 0.63 for the subset of lower-scoring participants. Good agreement was found for GMFM-66 scores for all participants (ICC = 0.998) and for subset of lower-scoring participants (ICC = 0.879).Conclusions: High levels of agreement exist between the GMAE-2 and the GMAE-3, which suggests that scores are comparable using either algorithm.","PeriodicalId":49006,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"37-40"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10841195/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0000000000001065","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the agreement between Gross Motor Ability Estimator-2 (GMAE-2) and Gross Motor Ability Estimator-3 (GMAE-3) calculations of Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (GMFM-66) scores in infants and young children with cerebral palsy.

Methods: Data from 53 children 5 to 53 months of age were analyzed. Agreement between GMFM-66 scores using the GMAE-2 and the GMAE-3 was calculated using Bland-Altman plots and interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Eleven participants who had at least 1 GMFM-66 score of less than 25 using either method were identified for further analysis.

Results: The average difference between GMFM-66 scores was 0.27 for all participants and 0.63 for the subset of lower-scoring participants. Good agreement was found for GMFM-66 scores for all participants (ICC = 0.998) and for subset of lower-scoring participants (ICC = 0.879).

Conclusions: High levels of agreement exist between the GMAE-2 and the GMAE-3, which suggests that scores are comparable using either algorithm.

查看原文本刊更多论文

幼儿脑瘫大运动能力估计器-2与大运动能力估计器-3的一致性。

目的:本研究的目的是确定大运动能力估计器-2 (GMAE-2)和大运动能力估计器-3 (GMAE-3)计算大运动功能测量-66 (GMFM-66)评分在婴幼儿脑瘫中的一致性。方法:对53例5 ~ 53月龄儿童的资料进行分析。使用GMAE-2和GMAE-3的GMFM-66评分之间的一致性使用Bland-Altman图和类间相关系数(ICCs)计算。使用任何一种方法，至少有1个GMFM-66得分低于25的参与者被确定为进一步分析。结果:所有参与者的GMFM-66得分的平均差异为0.27，得分较低的参与者子集的平均差异为0.63。所有参与者的GMFM-66评分(ICC = 0.998)和较低评分参与者的子集(ICC = 0.879)一致。结论:GMAE-2和GMAE-3之间存在高水平的一致性，这表明两种算法的得分具有可比性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Pediatric Physical Therapy PEDIATRICS-REHABILITATION

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

18.80%

发文量

147

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Pediatric Physical Therapy is an indexed international journal, that publishes peer reviewed research related to the practice of physical therapy for children with movement disorders. The editorial board is comprised of an international panel of researchers and clinical scholars that oversees a rigorous peer review process. The journal serves as the official journal for the pediatric physical therapy professional organizations in the Netherlands, Switzerland, New Zealand, Canada, and the United States. The journal includes articles that support evidenced based practice of physical therapy for children with neuromuscular, musculoskeletal, cardiorespiratory and developmental conditions that lead to disorders of movement, and research reports that contribute to the foundational sciences of pediatric physical therapy, ranging from biomechanics and pediatric exercise science to neurodevelopmental science. To these ends the journal publishes original research articles, systematic reviews directed to specific clinical questions that further the science of physical therapy, clinical guidelines and case reports that describe unusual conditions or cutting edge interventions with sound rationale. The journal adheres to the ethical standards of theInternational Committee of Medical Journal Editors.