The Role of the Indian Political Regime in Higher Education Reforms for Innovation Drive: Key Comparisons With China.

IF 1.1 4区社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES

Journal of Asian and African Studies Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-07 DOI:10.1177/00219096221097666

Romi Jain, Eric Ping Hung Li, Joseph Tse-Hei Lee

引用次数: 1

Abstract

As primary drivers of global growth, China and India as Asian giants are on the path to reforming their higher education systems to drive innovation. This paper based on both primary and secondary data sources investigates how India's democratic political leadership has facilitated higher education reform for fostering innovation while underlining key differences in the policy approach of the Chinese leadership. Findings identify the areas of reform for India and also reveal that epistemic boundaries between India and China are beginning to blur so far as right-wing ideological regimentation is concerned, with possible implications for innovation.

查看原文本刊更多论文

印度政治体制在促进创新的高等教育改革中的作用:与中国的主要比较。

作为全球经济增长的主要推动力，中国和印度作为亚洲大国正在改革其高等教育体系以推动创新。本文基于初级和二级数据来源，研究了印度的民主政治领导如何促进高等教育改革以促进创新，同时强调了中国领导层在政策方法上的关键差异。调查结果确定了印度的改革领域，也揭示了印度和中国之间的认知界限开始模糊，就右翼意识形态管制而言，这可能对创新产生影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Asian and African Studies AREA STUDIES-

CiteScore

2.70

自引率

10.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Asian and African Studies (JAAS) was founded in 1965 to further research and study on Asia and Africa. JAAS is a peer reviewed journal of area studies recognised for consistent scholarly contributions to cutting-edge issues and debates. The journal welcomes articles, research notes, and book reviews that focus on the dynamics of global change and development of Asian and African nations, societies, cultures, and the global community. Published articles cover: -development and change -technology and communication -globalization -public administration -politics -economy -education -health, wealth, and welfare -poverty and growth -humanities -sociology -political science -linguistics -economics JAAS adheres to a double-blind reviewing policy in which the identity of both the reviewer and author are always concealed from both parties. Decisions on manuscripts will be taken as rapidly as possible. However, while it is hoped that a decision can be made in 6-8 weeks, the refereeing process makes it impossible to predict the length of time that will be required to process any given manuscript.