Clinical outcomes of personalized blastocyst embryo transfer after endometrial receptivity analysis: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Reproductive Medicine and Biology Pub Date : 2023-11-29 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1002/rmb2.12550
Yuya Takeshige, Seung Chik Jwa, Yasushi Hirota, Yutaka Osuga, Takeshi Kuramoto, Yasuyuki Mio, Kenji Furui, Masayuki Kinutani, Masahide Shiotani, Yoshimasa Asada, Hirobumi Kamiya, Hiroaki Yoshida, Hideki Igarashi, Koichi Kyono
{"title":"Clinical outcomes of personalized blastocyst embryo transfer after endometrial receptivity analysis: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Yuya Takeshige, Seung Chik Jwa, Yasushi Hirota, Yutaka Osuga, Takeshi Kuramoto, Yasuyuki Mio, Kenji Furui, Masayuki Kinutani, Masahide Shiotani, Yoshimasa Asada, Hirobumi Kamiya, Hiroaki Yoshida, Hideki Igarashi, Koichi Kyono","doi":"10.1002/rmb2.12550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate clinical outcomes after endometrial receptivity analysis (ERA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study involving 861 women who underwent ERA testing at certified fertility clinics in Japan, and who received subsequent personalized blastocyst embryo transfers (ET) between 2018 and 2020. Clinical outcomes, including pregnancies, miscarriages, and live births, were evaluated according to receptivity status for ERA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean patient age was 37.7 years (SD = 4.0), and the median number of previous ETs was 2 (interquartile range, 2-3). 41.0% (353/861) of patients were non-receptive for ERA testing. Clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates for personalized blastocyst ET were 44.5% (226/508), 26.1% (59/226), and 26.8% (136/508) for receptive patients, and 43.1% (152/353), 28.3% (43/152), and 28.9% (102/353) for non-receptive patients, all statistically nonsignificant. Multiple logistic regression demonstrated similar nonsignificant associations between receptivity and clinical outcomes. Greater patient age, smoking, and longer duration of infertility were significantly and negatively associated with receptivity, whereas a history of delivery was positively associated and statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinical outcomes after ERA testing were similar between receptive and non-receptive patients. Further prospective study including an appropriate comparison group are warranted to evaluate the efficacy of ERA testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":21116,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Medicine and Biology","volume":"22 1","pages":"e12550"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10685329/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12550","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate clinical outcomes after endometrial receptivity analysis (ERA).

Methods: This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study involving 861 women who underwent ERA testing at certified fertility clinics in Japan, and who received subsequent personalized blastocyst embryo transfers (ET) between 2018 and 2020. Clinical outcomes, including pregnancies, miscarriages, and live births, were evaluated according to receptivity status for ERA.

Results: Mean patient age was 37.7 years (SD = 4.0), and the median number of previous ETs was 2 (interquartile range, 2-3). 41.0% (353/861) of patients were non-receptive for ERA testing. Clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates for personalized blastocyst ET were 44.5% (226/508), 26.1% (59/226), and 26.8% (136/508) for receptive patients, and 43.1% (152/353), 28.3% (43/152), and 28.9% (102/353) for non-receptive patients, all statistically nonsignificant. Multiple logistic regression demonstrated similar nonsignificant associations between receptivity and clinical outcomes. Greater patient age, smoking, and longer duration of infertility were significantly and negatively associated with receptivity, whereas a history of delivery was positively associated and statistically significant.

Conclusions: Clinical outcomes after ERA testing were similar between receptive and non-receptive patients. Further prospective study including an appropriate comparison group are warranted to evaluate the efficacy of ERA testing.

子宫内膜容受性分析后个体化囊胚胚胎移植的临床结果:一项多中心、回顾性队列研究。
目的:评价子宫内膜容受性分析(ERA)的临床效果。方法:这是一项多中心、回顾性队列研究,涉及861名妇女,她们在日本经认证的生育诊所接受了ERA检测,并在2018年至2020年期间接受了个性化囊胚胚胎移植(ET)。临床结果,包括妊娠、流产和活产,根据ERA的接受状况进行评估。结果:患者平均年龄为37.7岁(SD = 4.0),既往et的中位数为2(四分位数间距为2-3)。41.0%(353/861)的患者不接受ERA检测。个体化胚泡ET患者的临床妊娠、流产和活产率分别为44.5%(226/508)、26.1%(59/226)和26.8%(136/508),未接受组分别为43.1%(152/353)、28.3%(43/152)和28.9%(102/353),差异均无统计学意义。多元逻辑回归显示,接受度与临床结果之间存在类似的非显著关联。患者年龄较大、吸烟和不孕症持续时间较长与接受度呈显著负相关,而分娩史与接受度呈正相关且具有统计学意义。结论:接受ERA检测的患者和未接受ERA检测的患者的临床结果相似。需要进一步的前瞻性研究,包括适当的对照组来评估ERA测试的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
53
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Medicine and Biology (RMB) is the official English journal of the Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine, the Japan Society of Fertilization and Implantation, the Japan Society of Andrology, and publishes original research articles that report new findings or concepts in all aspects of reproductive phenomena in all kinds of mammals. Papers in any of the following fields will be considered: andrology, endocrinology, oncology, immunology, genetics, function of gonads and genital tracts, erectile dysfunction, gametogenesis, function of accessory sex organs, fertilization, embryogenesis, embryo manipulation, pregnancy, implantation, ontogenesis, infectious disease, contraception, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信