Comparison of Two Printed Pseudoisochromatic Tests for Color Vision Assessment.

IF 1.6 4区医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY

Optometry and Vision Science Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-27 DOI:10.1097/OPX.0000000000002087

Reema Alduhayan, Ali Almustanyir

{"title":"Comparison of Two Printed Pseudoisochromatic Tests for Color Vision Assessment.","authors":"Reema Alduhayan, Ali Almustanyir","doi":"10.1097/OPX.0000000000002087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Significance: The Waggoner PIP24 is a pseudoisochromatic test with a pattern similar to the Ishihara test. This study determined that the W-PIP24 can be used clinically to yield screening results (or sensitivity and specificity) comparable with the Ishihara.Purpose: This study aimed to determine whether the W-PIP24 is equivalent to the Ishihara 38 edition pseudoisochromatic test in detecting red-green color vision defects. Also, the performance of each plate of the W-PIP24 in detecting the color vision defects relative to the Ishihara test was determined.Methods: Sixty-three individuals with congenital red-green color vision defects and 57 with normal trichromacy were recruited. Participants were tested with both the Ishihara and W-PIP24. The first-order agreement coefficients were calculated for the Ishihara and W-PIP24. The results were also analyzed using specificity, sensitivity, efficiency, and predictive pass and fail values.Results: The agreement between the W-PIP24 and Ishihara test using the recommended criterion of using all plates was perfect. The sensitivity, specificity, predictive pass, and predictive fail were 1.00 (95% confidence interval, 0.94 to 1.00).Conclusions: This study showed that the W-PIP24 using a failure criterion of three or more errors on screening plates 1 to 15 is equivalent to the Ishihara test while screening for red-green color vision deficiency using a failure criterion of three or more errors on screening plates 1 to 17 of the Ishihara 38 edition.","PeriodicalId":19649,"journal":{"name":"Optometry and Vision Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optometry and Vision Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000002087","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Significance: The Waggoner PIP24 is a pseudoisochromatic test with a pattern similar to the Ishihara test. This study determined that the W-PIP24 can be used clinically to yield screening results (or sensitivity and specificity) comparable with the Ishihara.

Purpose: This study aimed to determine whether the W-PIP24 is equivalent to the Ishihara 38 edition pseudoisochromatic test in detecting red-green color vision defects. Also, the performance of each plate of the W-PIP24 in detecting the color vision defects relative to the Ishihara test was determined.

Methods: Sixty-three individuals with congenital red-green color vision defects and 57 with normal trichromacy were recruited. Participants were tested with both the Ishihara and W-PIP24. The first-order agreement coefficients were calculated for the Ishihara and W-PIP24. The results were also analyzed using specificity, sensitivity, efficiency, and predictive pass and fail values.

Results: The agreement between the W-PIP24 and Ishihara test using the recommended criterion of using all plates was perfect. The sensitivity, specificity, predictive pass, and predictive fail were 1.00 (95% confidence interval, 0.94 to 1.00).

Conclusions: This study showed that the W-PIP24 using a failure criterion of three or more errors on screening plates 1 to 15 is equivalent to the Ishihara test while screening for red-green color vision deficiency using a failure criterion of three or more errors on screening plates 1 to 17 of the Ishihara 38 edition.

查看原文本刊更多论文

两种印刷伪等色测试在色觉评估中的比较。

意义:Waggoner PIP24 (W-PIP24)是一种伪等色测试，其模式与Ishihara测试相似。本研究确定W-PIP24可用于临床，产生与Ishihara相当的筛查结果(或敏感性和特异性)。目的:本研究旨在确定W-PIP24在检测红绿色觉缺陷方面是否等同于石原38版假等色测验。同时，测定了W-PIP24各板相对于石原试验检测色觉缺陷的性能。方法:招募先天性红绿色觉缺陷者63例，正常三色视者57例。参与者接受了石原基因和W-PIP24基因的测试。计算了石原和W-PIP24的一阶一致系数(AC1)。结果还使用特异性、敏感性、效率和预测通过和不通过值进行分析。结果:W-PIP24与石原试验在使用所有钢板的推荐标准之间的一致性是完美的。敏感性、特异性、预测通过和预测不通过均为1.00(95%可信区间:0.94-1.00)。结论:本研究表明，W-PIP24在筛选板1-15上使用≥3个错误的失效标准与石原试验相当，而在筛选板1-17上使用≥3个错误的失效标准筛选红绿色视觉缺陷的石原38版。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Optometry and Vision Science 医学-眼科学

CiteScore

2.80

自引率

7.10%

发文量

210

审稿时长

3-6 weeks

期刊介绍： Optometry and Vision Science is the monthly peer-reviewed scientific publication of the American Academy of Optometry, publishing original research since 1924. Optometry and Vision Science is an internationally recognized source for education and information on current discoveries in optometry, physiological optics, vision science, and related fields. The journal considers original contributions that advance clinical practice, vision science, and public health. Authors should remember that the journal reaches readers worldwide and their submissions should be relevant and of interest to a broad audience. Topical priorities include, but are not limited to: clinical and laboratory research, evidence-based reviews, contact lenses, ocular growth and refractive error development, eye movements, visual function and perception, biology of the eye and ocular disease, epidemiology and public health, biomedical optics and instrumentation, novel and important clinical observations and treatments, and optometric education.