Outcome of Surgical Management of Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberance: A Single-Institution Multidisciplinary Approach.

IF 1.7 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopedic Research and Reviews Pub Date : 2023-11-20 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2147/ORR.S437175
Abdulrahman Yousef Alhabeeb, Ahmed O Idrees, Thamer S Alhowaish, Moustafa S Alhamadh, Emad Masudi, Abdullah Alanazi, Wazzan Aljuhani
{"title":"Outcome of Surgical Management of Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberance: A Single-Institution Multidisciplinary Approach.","authors":"Abdulrahman Yousef Alhabeeb, Ahmed O Idrees, Thamer S Alhowaish, Moustafa S Alhamadh, Emad Masudi, Abdullah Alanazi, Wazzan Aljuhani","doi":"10.2147/ORR.S437175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a rare, slow-growing, and locally aggressive soft tissue tumor with a high recurrence rate and metastatic potential, even with the proper treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective (case series) study that took place at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, to determine the outcomes of and appropriate margin excision for DFSP. All patients who were diagnosed with DFSP from 2016 to 2021 were included. The following variables were assessed: demographics, tumor characteristics, management options, and most importantly, whether patients were managed with an oncology-oriented approach or a non-oncology-oriented approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were a total of seventeen patients with DFSP, four of whom had fibrosarcomatous differentiation (FS-DFSP). The majority (N = 13, 76.5%) of the patients were females. The lower extremities and back were the most common locations for DFSP, accounting for 47.1% and 23.5%, respectively. Only two (11.76%) patients had metastatic disease, one of whom had FS-DFSP. The minimum resection margin was 3 cm, and the maximum was 5 cm. Thirteen (76.47%) patients were managed with an oncology-oriented approach (Group I), 23% of whom had post-excision positive margins. However, all patients who were managed with a non-oncology-oriented approach (Group II) had positive margins post-excision. More than three-quarters (76.9%) of group I underwent wide resection. Split-thickness skin grafting and primary closure were the most commonly used reconstruction methods in groups I and II, respectively. The mean planned margins in groups I and II were 3.9 cm and 1.7 cm, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study suggest that a planned wide-margin excision with a minimum safe margin of 3-5 cm should be implemented to reduce the recurrence, metastasis, and need for further surgeries in patients with DFSP.</p>","PeriodicalId":19608,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","volume":"15 ","pages":"237-243"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10675642/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S437175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a rare, slow-growing, and locally aggressive soft tissue tumor with a high recurrence rate and metastatic potential, even with the proper treatment.

Methods: This was a retrospective (case series) study that took place at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, to determine the outcomes of and appropriate margin excision for DFSP. All patients who were diagnosed with DFSP from 2016 to 2021 were included. The following variables were assessed: demographics, tumor characteristics, management options, and most importantly, whether patients were managed with an oncology-oriented approach or a non-oncology-oriented approach.

Results: There were a total of seventeen patients with DFSP, four of whom had fibrosarcomatous differentiation (FS-DFSP). The majority (N = 13, 76.5%) of the patients were females. The lower extremities and back were the most common locations for DFSP, accounting for 47.1% and 23.5%, respectively. Only two (11.76%) patients had metastatic disease, one of whom had FS-DFSP. The minimum resection margin was 3 cm, and the maximum was 5 cm. Thirteen (76.47%) patients were managed with an oncology-oriented approach (Group I), 23% of whom had post-excision positive margins. However, all patients who were managed with a non-oncology-oriented approach (Group II) had positive margins post-excision. More than three-quarters (76.9%) of group I underwent wide resection. Split-thickness skin grafting and primary closure were the most commonly used reconstruction methods in groups I and II, respectively. The mean planned margins in groups I and II were 3.9 cm and 1.7 cm, respectively.

Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that a planned wide-margin excision with a minimum safe margin of 3-5 cm should be implemented to reduce the recurrence, metastasis, and need for further surgeries in patients with DFSP.

皮肤纤维肉瘤隆突的外科治疗结果:单一机构多学科方法。
摘要:隆突性皮肤纤维肉瘤(DFSP)是一种罕见的、生长缓慢的、局部侵袭性的软组织肿瘤,即使经过适当的治疗,其复发率和转移潜力也很高。方法:这是一项回顾性(病例系列)研究,发生在沙特阿拉伯王国利雅得的阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王医疗城,以确定DFSP的结果和适当的切缘切除术。所有2016年至2021年诊断为DFSP的患者均被纳入研究。评估了以下变量:人口统计学、肿瘤特征、管理选择,最重要的是,患者是否采用肿瘤导向的方法或非肿瘤导向的方法。结果:共有17例DFSP患者,其中4例为纤维肉瘤分化(FS-DFSP)。女性占多数(N = 13, 76.5%)。下肢和背部是DFSP最常见的部位,分别占47.1%和23.5%。只有2例(11.76%)患者有转移性疾病,其中1例有FS-DFSP。最小切缘为3 cm,最大切缘为5 cm。13例(76.47%)患者采用肿瘤导向方法(I组),其中23%的患者切除后边缘呈阳性。然而,所有采用非肿瘤学导向方法(II组)的患者在切除后均有阳性切缘。超过四分之三(76.9%)的I组患者行广泛切除术。分厚植皮和一期闭合分别是I组和II组最常用的重建方法。I组和II组的平均计划切缘分别为3.9 cm和1.7 cm。结论:本研究结果提示,为减少DFSP患者的复发、转移和进一步手术的需要,应实施最小安全边缘为3-5 cm的计划宽切缘切除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopedic Research and Reviews
Orthopedic Research and Reviews Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopedic Research and Reviews is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on the patho-physiology of the musculoskeletal system, trauma, surgery and other corrective interventions to restore mobility and function. Advances in new technologies, materials, techniques and pharmacological agents will be particularly welcome. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Patho-physiology and bioengineering, Technologies and materials science, Surgical techniques, including robotics, Trauma management and care, Treatment including pharmacological and non-pharmacological, Rehabilitation and Multidisciplinarian care approaches, Patient quality of life, satisfaction and preference, Health economic evaluations. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, basic science and technology, clinical studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, case reports and extended reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信