Comparison of Time to Report the Side Effects after AstraZeneca and Sinopharm Vaccinations in Users of the COVID-19 Symptom Study App: A Survey in South Iran.

Q2 Medicine
Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran Pub Date : 2023-09-12 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.47176/mjiri.37.99
Marjan Zare, Alireza Mirahmadizadeh, Masoumeh Khosravi, Mohammadreza Karimi, Seyedeh Leila Dehghani
{"title":"Comparison of Time to Report the Side Effects after AstraZeneca and Sinopharm Vaccinations in Users of the COVID-19 Symptom Study App: A Survey in South Iran.","authors":"Marjan Zare, Alireza Mirahmadizadeh, Masoumeh Khosravi, Mohammadreza Karimi, Seyedeh Leila Dehghani","doi":"10.47176/mjiri.37.99","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Concerns about the side effects of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have been raised nationwide. We aimed to compare the time to report the side effects of the Oxford-AstraZeneca and Sinopharm COVID-19 vaccines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Information on side effects of AstraZeneca and Sinopharm COVID-19 vaccines was obtained from the COVID-19 Symptom Study App affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Science during 2021. A COX regression model with an adjusted Hazard Ratio and 95% Confidence Interval; HR (95% C.I) was reported at the significance level of < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>4478 and 5555 participants received the AstraZeneca and Sinopharm vaccines, respectively; more age, history of SARS-CoV-2 infection, first vaccine dose, hypertension, and hypertension with cardiovascular disease were seen in the AstraZeneca group (<i>P</i> < 0.05 for all). However, the AstraZeneca group had lower immune deficiency and time to report the side effects (<i>P</i> < 0.05 for both). There was significantly less time to pain HR(95% C.I.); 0.50 (0.47-0.52), vertigo 0.65 (0.61-0.69), weakness 0.41 (0.38-0.44), headache 0.43 (0.39-0.74), anorexia 0.31 (0.28-0.34), nausea 0.56 (0.51-0.62), severer allergy 0.71 (0.63-0.81), general inflammation 0.27 (0.23-0.31), fever > 38oC 0.12 (0.1-0.15), eye inflammation 0.45 (0.39-0.52), diarrhea 0.85 (0.73-0.99), blurred vision 0.73 (0.61-0.86), injection site redness 0.32 (0.26-0.39), fatigue/paleness 0.53 (0.50-0.57), joint pain 0.55 (0.41-0.73), auxiliary gland inflation 0.59 (0.43-0.80), convulsions 0.30 (0.17-0.52), and severe side effects 0.3 (0.27-0.33) in the AstraZeneca group; However, skin rash 0.77 (0.57-1.05) and hospitalization 0.72 (0.21-2.55) were the same.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sinopharm COVID-19 vaccine recipients reported longer times to report vaccine-related side effects than AstraZeneca; due to the lack of adverse effects like hospitalization, vaccination should continue to control the pandemic; more real-population studies are needed on the long-term effects of vaccination against COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":18361,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10657253/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.37.99","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Concerns about the side effects of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have been raised nationwide. We aimed to compare the time to report the side effects of the Oxford-AstraZeneca and Sinopharm COVID-19 vaccines.

Methods: Information on side effects of AstraZeneca and Sinopharm COVID-19 vaccines was obtained from the COVID-19 Symptom Study App affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Science during 2021. A COX regression model with an adjusted Hazard Ratio and 95% Confidence Interval; HR (95% C.I) was reported at the significance level of < 0.05.

Results: 4478 and 5555 participants received the AstraZeneca and Sinopharm vaccines, respectively; more age, history of SARS-CoV-2 infection, first vaccine dose, hypertension, and hypertension with cardiovascular disease were seen in the AstraZeneca group (P < 0.05 for all). However, the AstraZeneca group had lower immune deficiency and time to report the side effects (P < 0.05 for both). There was significantly less time to pain HR(95% C.I.); 0.50 (0.47-0.52), vertigo 0.65 (0.61-0.69), weakness 0.41 (0.38-0.44), headache 0.43 (0.39-0.74), anorexia 0.31 (0.28-0.34), nausea 0.56 (0.51-0.62), severer allergy 0.71 (0.63-0.81), general inflammation 0.27 (0.23-0.31), fever > 38oC 0.12 (0.1-0.15), eye inflammation 0.45 (0.39-0.52), diarrhea 0.85 (0.73-0.99), blurred vision 0.73 (0.61-0.86), injection site redness 0.32 (0.26-0.39), fatigue/paleness 0.53 (0.50-0.57), joint pain 0.55 (0.41-0.73), auxiliary gland inflation 0.59 (0.43-0.80), convulsions 0.30 (0.17-0.52), and severe side effects 0.3 (0.27-0.33) in the AstraZeneca group; However, skin rash 0.77 (0.57-1.05) and hospitalization 0.72 (0.21-2.55) were the same.

Conclusion: Sinopharm COVID-19 vaccine recipients reported longer times to report vaccine-related side effects than AstraZeneca; due to the lack of adverse effects like hospitalization, vaccination should continue to control the pandemic; more real-population studies are needed on the long-term effects of vaccination against COVID-19.

在伊朗南部的一项调查中,使用COVID-19症状研究应用程序的用户中,阿斯利康和国药集团接种疫苗后报告副作用的时间比较
背景:对SARS-CoV-2疫苗副作用的担忧已在全国范围内引起关注。我们的目的是比较牛津-阿斯利康和国药集团COVID-19疫苗副作用报告的时间。方法:从设拉子医科大学附属的2021年COVID-19症状研究App获取阿斯利康和国药新冠疫苗的副作用信息。校正风险比和95%置信区间的COX回归模型HR (95% ci)在< 0.05的显著性水平上报道。结果:4478名受试者接种了阿斯利康疫苗,5555名受试者接种了国药集团疫苗;阿斯利康组患者年龄、SARS-CoV-2感染史、首次疫苗剂量、高血压、高血压合并心血管疾病发生率均高于对照组(P < 0.05)。然而,阿斯利康组的免疫缺陷和报告副作用的时间较短(P < 0.05)。疼痛时间明显缩短(95% C.I.);0.50(0.47-0.52),眩晕0.65(0.61-0.69),虚弱0.41(0.38-0.44),头痛0.43(0.39-0.74),厌食0.31(0.28-0.34),恶心0.56(0.51-0.62),严重过敏0.71(0.63-0.81),一般炎症0.27(0.23-0.31),发热> 38℃0.12(0.1-0.15),眼部炎症0.45(0.39-0.52),腹泻0.85(0.73-0.99),视力模糊0.73(0.61-0.86),注射部位红肿0.32(0.26-0.39),疲劳/苍白0.53(0.50-0.57),关节痛0.55(0.41-0.73),辅助腺体肿胀0.59 (0.43-0.80),阿斯利康组痉挛0.30(0.17-0.52),严重副作用0.3 (0.27-0.33);皮疹0.77(0.57 ~ 1.05),住院率0.72(0.21 ~ 2.55)。结论:国药集团COVID-19疫苗接种者报告疫苗相关副作用的时间长于阿斯利康;由于缺乏住院等不良反应,应继续接种疫苗以控制大流行;需要对COVID-19疫苗接种的长期效果进行更多的实际人群研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
8 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信