Catherine E Kelty, Michael G Dickinson, Rob Lyerla, Kata Chillag, Kieran J Fogarty
{"title":"Non-Medical Characteristics Affect Referral for Advanced Heart Failure Services: a Retrospective Review.","authors":"Catherine E Kelty, Michael G Dickinson, Rob Lyerla, Kata Chillag, Kieran J Fogarty","doi":"10.1007/s40615-023-01879-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with advanced heart failure (AHF) are extensively evaluated before heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) eligibility. Patients are assessed for medical need and psychosocial or economic factors that may affect success post-treatment. For patients to be evaluated, however, they first must be referred. This study investigated social and economic factors affecting AHF referral, specialist visits, or treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with heart failure (n = 24,258) were reviewed at one large hospital system over 4 years. Independent variables age, sex, marital status, race/ethnicity, preferred language, smoking, and insurance status were assessed for the outcomes of referral, clinic visit, and treatment by Chi-square and ANOVA. In-house and 1-year mortality were evaluated by logistic regression, and time-to-event was assessed by the Cox proportional hazards model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Younger (HR 0.934, 95% CI 0.925-0.943), male (HR 2.216, 95% CI 1.544-3.181), and publicly insured (HR 1.298 [95% CI 1.038, 1.623]) patients were more likely to be referred, while unmarried (HR 0.665, 95% CI 0.488-0.905) and smoking (HR 0.549, 95% CI 0.389-0.776) patients had fewer referrals. Younger, married, and nonsmoking patients were more likely to have a clinic visit. Younger age, White race, and Hispanic/Latino ethnicity were associated with receiving a heart transplant, and LVAD recipients were more likely Hispanic/Latino ethnicity. Advanced age, Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, and smoking were associated with 1-year mortality after heart failure diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Disparities in access exist before evaluation for AHF therapies. Improving access at the levels of referral and evaluation is a necessary step toward achieving equity in organ allocation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":" ","pages":"374-383"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11143079/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-023-01879-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Patients with advanced heart failure (AHF) are extensively evaluated before heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) eligibility. Patients are assessed for medical need and psychosocial or economic factors that may affect success post-treatment. For patients to be evaluated, however, they first must be referred. This study investigated social and economic factors affecting AHF referral, specialist visits, or treatment.
Methods: Patients with heart failure (n = 24,258) were reviewed at one large hospital system over 4 years. Independent variables age, sex, marital status, race/ethnicity, preferred language, smoking, and insurance status were assessed for the outcomes of referral, clinic visit, and treatment by Chi-square and ANOVA. In-house and 1-year mortality were evaluated by logistic regression, and time-to-event was assessed by the Cox proportional hazards model.
Results: Younger (HR 0.934, 95% CI 0.925-0.943), male (HR 2.216, 95% CI 1.544-3.181), and publicly insured (HR 1.298 [95% CI 1.038, 1.623]) patients were more likely to be referred, while unmarried (HR 0.665, 95% CI 0.488-0.905) and smoking (HR 0.549, 95% CI 0.389-0.776) patients had fewer referrals. Younger, married, and nonsmoking patients were more likely to have a clinic visit. Younger age, White race, and Hispanic/Latino ethnicity were associated with receiving a heart transplant, and LVAD recipients were more likely Hispanic/Latino ethnicity. Advanced age, Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, and smoking were associated with 1-year mortality after heart failure diagnosis.
Conclusions: Disparities in access exist before evaluation for AHF therapies. Improving access at the levels of referral and evaluation is a necessary step toward achieving equity in organ allocation.
背景:晚期心力衰竭(AHF)患者在心脏移植或左心室辅助装置(LVAD)前被广泛评估。评估患者的医疗需求和可能影响治疗后成功的社会心理或经济因素。然而,要对患者进行评估,他们首先必须转诊。本研究探讨影响AHF转诊、专科就诊或治疗的社会及经济因素。方法:对一家大型医院系统4年以上心力衰竭患者(n = 24258)进行回顾性分析。采用卡方分析和方差分析对自变量年龄、性别、婚姻状况、种族/民族、首选语言、吸烟和保险状况进行转诊、就诊和治疗的结果评估。采用logistic回归评估住院死亡率和1年死亡率,采用Cox比例风险模型评估事件发生时间。结果:年轻(HR 0.934, 95% CI 0.925-0.943)、男性(HR 2.216, 95% CI 1.544-3.181)和有公共保险(HR 1.298 [95% CI 1.038, 1.623])的患者更容易转诊,而未婚(HR 0.665, 95% CI 0.488-0.905)和吸烟(HR 0.549, 95% CI 0.389-0.776)的患者转诊较少。年轻、已婚和不吸烟的患者更有可能去诊所就诊。年龄较小、白人和西班牙裔/拉丁裔与接受心脏移植有关,LVAD受者更可能是西班牙裔/拉丁裔。高龄、西班牙裔/拉丁裔和吸烟与心力衰竭诊断后1年死亡率相关。结论:AHF治疗评估前存在可及性差异。改善转诊和评价两级的机会是实现器官分配公平的必要步骤。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.