Proton versus photon radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: Current data and technical considerations.

IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY
Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT Pub Date : 2023-01-01
Hannah J Roberts, Theodore S Hong
{"title":"Proton versus photon radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: Current data and technical considerations.","authors":"Hannah J Roberts, Theodore S Hong","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radiation is an accepted standard of care for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and while photon radiation is the current standard, the use of proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) is an active area of investigation given its ability to better spare uninvolved liver. Patients with HCC typically have background liver disease and many patients die of their underlying liver function in the absence of tumor progression. Early photon-based series showed promising rates of local control however the risk of non-classic radiation induced liver disease (RILD) remains relatively high and may be associated with poorer outcomes. There is a theoretical advantage to PBT in its ability to spare uninvolved liver parenchyma and potentially allow for further dose escalation. There are technical considerations for image guidance, respiratory motion management, and conformality to both PBT and photon radiotherapy that are critical to optimizing each modality. Whether the use of PBT affects clinical outcomes is the subject of the ongoing NRG Oncology GI003 trial, that randomizes patients with HCC to protons or photons. This article reviews the technical differences and literature on individual outcomes for PBT and photon radiation as well as the available comparative data.</p>","PeriodicalId":16917,"journal":{"name":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","volume":"9 1","pages":"9-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10681146/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Radiation is an accepted standard of care for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and while photon radiation is the current standard, the use of proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) is an active area of investigation given its ability to better spare uninvolved liver. Patients with HCC typically have background liver disease and many patients die of their underlying liver function in the absence of tumor progression. Early photon-based series showed promising rates of local control however the risk of non-classic radiation induced liver disease (RILD) remains relatively high and may be associated with poorer outcomes. There is a theoretical advantage to PBT in its ability to spare uninvolved liver parenchyma and potentially allow for further dose escalation. There are technical considerations for image guidance, respiratory motion management, and conformality to both PBT and photon radiotherapy that are critical to optimizing each modality. Whether the use of PBT affects clinical outcomes is the subject of the ongoing NRG Oncology GI003 trial, that randomizes patients with HCC to protons or photons. This article reviews the technical differences and literature on individual outcomes for PBT and photon radiation as well as the available comparative data.

质子与光子放射治疗肝细胞癌:目前的数据和技术考虑。
放疗是不可切除的肝细胞癌(HCC)的公认治疗标准,虽然光子放疗是目前的标准,但质子束放疗(PBT)的使用是一个活跃的研究领域,因为它能够更好地保护未受损伤的肝脏。HCC患者通常有背景肝病,许多患者在没有肿瘤进展的情况下死于其潜在的肝功能。早期基于光子的系列显示出有希望的局部控制率,但非经典辐射引起的肝脏疾病(RILD)的风险仍然相对较高,可能与较差的结果相关。PBT有一个理论上的优势,它能够避免未受损伤的肝实质,并可能允许进一步的剂量增加。图像引导、呼吸运动管理以及PBT和光子放疗的一致性都是优化每种模式的关键技术考虑因素。使用PBT是否会影响临床结果是正在进行的NRG肿瘤学GI003试验的主题,该试验将HCC患者随机分配到质子或光子。本文回顾了PBT和光子辐射的技术差异和文献,以及现有的比较数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信