{"title":"Difficulty in Serologic Screening for Subclinical Rubella during Pregnancy.","authors":"Kazuya Hiiragi, Ryosuke Shindo, Satoru Shinoda, Mika Okuda, Keiko Tanaka-Taya, Kentaro Kurasawa, Etsuko Miyagi, Shigeru Aoki","doi":"10.7883/yoken.JJID.2023.222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Japan, rubella antibodies are tested in all pregnant women to detect subclinical infections. This study aimed to assess the validity of measuring rubella antibodies for detecting subclinical rubella among pregnant women in Japan. This single-center retrospective study measured rubella hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers and rubella-specific IgM antibody index (IgM) values. IgM values were measured by conducting enzyme immunoassay, and IgM-values >1.2 were considered positive. Of 14,965 included pregnant women, 186 (1.2%) were IgM-positive. Only one patient was clinically diagnosed with rubella (HI titer, 1:2,048; IgM value, 10) and developed fever and skin rash. She decided to terminate her pregnancy without undergoing repeated blood tests. Of the IgM-positive patients, 136 (73.1%) had rubella HI titers of < 1:256. The correlation coefficient between rubella HI and IgM titers was weakly positive (0.2527; P < 0.0001). This study showed that a single combination of rubella HI and rubella-specific IgM measurements alone could not detect subclinical rubella. Creating awareness among pregnant women by informing them that almost all rubella-specific IgM-positive individuals without symptoms are not acutely infected could decrease their anxiety and prevent unnecessary pregnancy termination.</p>","PeriodicalId":14608,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of infectious diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of infectious diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7883/yoken.JJID.2023.222","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In Japan, rubella antibodies are tested in all pregnant women to detect subclinical infections. This study aimed to assess the validity of measuring rubella antibodies for detecting subclinical rubella among pregnant women in Japan. This single-center retrospective study measured rubella hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers and rubella-specific IgM antibody index (IgM) values. IgM values were measured by conducting enzyme immunoassay, and IgM-values >1.2 were considered positive. Of 14,965 included pregnant women, 186 (1.2%) were IgM-positive. Only one patient was clinically diagnosed with rubella (HI titer, 1:2,048; IgM value, 10) and developed fever and skin rash. She decided to terminate her pregnancy without undergoing repeated blood tests. Of the IgM-positive patients, 136 (73.1%) had rubella HI titers of < 1:256. The correlation coefficient between rubella HI and IgM titers was weakly positive (0.2527; P < 0.0001). This study showed that a single combination of rubella HI and rubella-specific IgM measurements alone could not detect subclinical rubella. Creating awareness among pregnant women by informing them that almost all rubella-specific IgM-positive individuals without symptoms are not acutely infected could decrease their anxiety and prevent unnecessary pregnancy termination.
期刊介绍:
Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases (JJID), an official bimonthly publication of National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Japan, publishes papers dealing with basic research on infectious diseases relevant to humans in the fields of bacteriology, virology, mycology, parasitology, medical entomology, vaccinology, and toxinology. Pathology, immunology, biochemistry, and blood safety related to microbial pathogens are among the fields covered. Sections include: original papers, short communications, epidemiological reports, methods, laboratory and epidemiology communications, letters to the editor, and reviews.