Attitudes of primary care physicians towards antimicrobial stewardship and the impact of a multi-part training course - a pilot study.

IF 1.7 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
GMS Hygiene and Infection Control Pub Date : 2023-10-10 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3205/dgkh000450
Katharina Last, Arne Simon, Barbara C Gärtner, Sören L Becker, Cihan Papan
{"title":"Attitudes of primary care physicians towards antimicrobial stewardship and the impact of a multi-part training course - a pilot study.","authors":"Katharina Last, Arne Simon, Barbara C Gärtner, Sören L Becker, Cihan Papan","doi":"10.3205/dgkh000450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A plethora of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs has been initiated during the past years, focusing on hospital settings. Primary-care physicians have seldom been addressed, although the majority of antibiotic prescriptions are issued for outpatients. We sought to investigate attitudes of primary-care physicians and the impact of a customized training course.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Primary-care physicians in southwest Germany were invited to a multi-part training course on AMS in the primary-care setting. Participants were asked to answer a questionnaire about their attitude and factors that hinder them from implementing AMS or enable them to perform AMS. In addition, a knowledge assessment exam at the beginning and end of the training was conducted on selected infectious diseases/syndromes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 36 primary-care physicians participated in the training course. The predominant age group was 51-60 years old (36%; 13/36). The majority, 23/35 (66%), indicated never having had AMS training, while 22/35 (63%) acknowledged partly implementing AMS activities in their daily routine. The primary barrier was lack of expertise, while the main motives were reducing antimicrobial resistance and optimizing patient care. The provision of guidelines was regarded as more important than feedback on their prescription behavior. Exam performance improved from the initial to the final exam on all topics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Customized AMS training courses are a feasible and potentially complimentary tool to address antibiotic misuse in the primary-care setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":12738,"journal":{"name":"GMS Hygiene and Infection Control","volume":"18 ","pages":"Doc24"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10665713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS Hygiene and Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A plethora of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs has been initiated during the past years, focusing on hospital settings. Primary-care physicians have seldom been addressed, although the majority of antibiotic prescriptions are issued for outpatients. We sought to investigate attitudes of primary-care physicians and the impact of a customized training course.

Methods: Primary-care physicians in southwest Germany were invited to a multi-part training course on AMS in the primary-care setting. Participants were asked to answer a questionnaire about their attitude and factors that hinder them from implementing AMS or enable them to perform AMS. In addition, a knowledge assessment exam at the beginning and end of the training was conducted on selected infectious diseases/syndromes.

Results: In total, 36 primary-care physicians participated in the training course. The predominant age group was 51-60 years old (36%; 13/36). The majority, 23/35 (66%), indicated never having had AMS training, while 22/35 (63%) acknowledged partly implementing AMS activities in their daily routine. The primary barrier was lack of expertise, while the main motives were reducing antimicrobial resistance and optimizing patient care. The provision of guidelines was regarded as more important than feedback on their prescription behavior. Exam performance improved from the initial to the final exam on all topics.

Conclusion: Customized AMS training courses are a feasible and potentially complimentary tool to address antibiotic misuse in the primary-care setting.

初级保健医生对抗菌药物管理的态度和多部分培训课程的影响-一项试点研究。
背景:在过去的几年中,已经启动了大量的抗菌药物管理(AMS)计划,重点是医院设置。初级保健医生很少得到解决,尽管大多数抗生素处方是为门诊病人开出的。我们试图调查初级保健医生的态度和定制培训课程的影响。方法:邀请德国西南部的初级保健医生参加由多个部分组成的初级保健机构AMS培训课程。参与者被要求回答一份问卷,了解他们的态度和阻碍他们实施辅助医疗服务或使他们能够实施辅助医疗服务的因素。此外,在培训开始和结束时对选定的传染病/综合症进行了知识评估考试。结果:共有36名基层医师参加培训。51-60岁为主要年龄组(36%;13/36)。大多数人,23/35(66%)表示从未接受过医疗辅助队的培训,而22/35(63%)承认在日常生活中部分实施医疗辅助队的活动。主要障碍是缺乏专业知识,而主要动机是减少抗菌素耐药性和优化患者护理。提供指导方针被认为比对他们的处方行为的反馈更重要。从初考到期末考,所有科目的考试成绩都有所提高。结论:定制的AMS培训课程是解决初级保健环境中抗生素滥用问题的可行和潜在的补充工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GMS Hygiene and Infection Control
GMS Hygiene and Infection Control PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信