Trajectory of pulmonary congestion during TAVR.

IF 3.1 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Teruhiko Imamura, Toshihide Izumida, Hiroshi Onoda, Shuhei Tanaka, Ryuichi Ushijima, Mitsuo Sobajima, Nobuyuki Fukuda, Hiroshi Ueno, Koichiro Kinugawa
{"title":"Trajectory of pulmonary congestion during TAVR.","authors":"Teruhiko Imamura, Toshihide Izumida, Hiroshi Onoda, Shuhei Tanaka, Ryuichi Ushijima, Mitsuo Sobajima, Nobuyuki Fukuda, Hiroshi Ueno, Koichiro Kinugawa","doi":"10.1007/s12928-023-00971-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with severe aortic stenosis often experience pulmonary congestion due to incremental afterload. The trajectory of pulmonary fluid volume during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains uncertain. Remote dielectric sensing (ReDS) is a recently introduced device for non-invasive quantification of lung fluid volume without expert techniques. We evaluated the trajectory of ReDS values during TAVR and its prognostic implications. Patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent ReDS measurements upon admission and at the index discharge after TAVR between 2021 and 2022 were eligible. They were followed up until August 2023. The primary focus was on the trajectory of ReDS values during TAVR, with secondary consideration given to its impact on the composite of death or all-cause readmission after TAVR. A total of 57 patients were included. Median age was 84 years and 24 were male. ReDS value remained unchanged after TAVR, changing from 27% (IQR 24%, 29%) to 26% (IQR 24%, 30%) (p = 0.65). ReDS value did not decrease in 23 (40%) patients. The presence of coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation were associated with no decrease in ReDS value. This lack of decrease in ReDS value was linked to death or all-cause readmission after TAVR, with an age-adjusted hazard ratio of 3.40 (95% confidence interval 1.01-11.4, p = 0.048). The degree of lung fluid amount did not decrease in 40% of TAVR candidates during the procedure. The lack of decrease in lung fluid amount was associated with mortality and morbidity after TAVR. The next concern is to establish therapeutic strategy for patients with residual pulmonary congestion after TAVR.</p>","PeriodicalId":9439,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-023-00971-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients with severe aortic stenosis often experience pulmonary congestion due to incremental afterload. The trajectory of pulmonary fluid volume during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains uncertain. Remote dielectric sensing (ReDS) is a recently introduced device for non-invasive quantification of lung fluid volume without expert techniques. We evaluated the trajectory of ReDS values during TAVR and its prognostic implications. Patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent ReDS measurements upon admission and at the index discharge after TAVR between 2021 and 2022 were eligible. They were followed up until August 2023. The primary focus was on the trajectory of ReDS values during TAVR, with secondary consideration given to its impact on the composite of death or all-cause readmission after TAVR. A total of 57 patients were included. Median age was 84 years and 24 were male. ReDS value remained unchanged after TAVR, changing from 27% (IQR 24%, 29%) to 26% (IQR 24%, 30%) (p = 0.65). ReDS value did not decrease in 23 (40%) patients. The presence of coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation were associated with no decrease in ReDS value. This lack of decrease in ReDS value was linked to death or all-cause readmission after TAVR, with an age-adjusted hazard ratio of 3.40 (95% confidence interval 1.01-11.4, p = 0.048). The degree of lung fluid amount did not decrease in 40% of TAVR candidates during the procedure. The lack of decrease in lung fluid amount was associated with mortality and morbidity after TAVR. The next concern is to establish therapeutic strategy for patients with residual pulmonary congestion after TAVR.

TAVR期间肺充血的轨迹。
严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者常因后负荷增加而出现肺充血。经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)期间肺液量的变化轨迹仍不确定。远程介质传感(red)是最近引进的一种无需专家技术的无创肺液量定量设备。我们评估了TAVR期间red值的变化轨迹及其预后意义。严重主动脉瓣狭窄的患者在入院时和2021年至2022年TAVR术后指数出院时进行了red测量。他们被追踪到2023年8月。主要关注TAVR期间red值的变化轨迹,其次考虑其对TAVR后死亡或全因再入院的综合影响。共纳入57例患者。平均年龄84岁,男性24岁。TAVR后的red值保持不变,从27% (IQR 24%, 29%)变为26% (IQR 24%, 30%) (p = 0.65)。23例(40%)患者的red值未下降。冠状动脉疾病和心房颤动的存在与red值的降低无关。red值缺乏降低与TAVR后死亡或全因再入院有关,年龄校正风险比为3.40(95%可信区间1.01-11.4,p = 0.048)。40%的TAVR患者在手术过程中肺液量没有减少。肺液量缺乏减少与TAVR后的死亡率和发病率相关。下一个关注的问题是建立TAVR术后残余肺充血患者的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT) is an international journal covering the field of cardiovascular disease and includes cardiac (coronary and noncoronary) and peripheral interventions and therapeutics. Articles are subject to peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability. CVIT is an official journal of The Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信