Utilization of Single-Incision Laparoscopy in the Management of Ingested Magnets.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Sara Ardila, Lucille Woodley, Emily Ulloa, Jenelle Fernandez, Jeffery Bornstein, Aaron Seims
{"title":"Utilization of Single-Incision Laparoscopy in the Management of Ingested Magnets.","authors":"Sara Ardila, Lucille Woodley, Emily Ulloa, Jenelle Fernandez, Jeffery Bornstein, Aaron Seims","doi":"10.1089/lap.2023.0394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> A ban on neodymium magnets was lifted by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission in 2016. Pediatric gastroenterologists and surgeons were increasingly tasked with removing these problematic objects. The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) in the management of ingested magnets. <b><i>Patients and Methods:</i></b> This is a single-center, retrospective assessment of surgical interventions for ingested magnets. International Classification of Disease, 10th revision codes were used to identify 349 patients ≤21 years of age evaluated for foreign body ingestion over a 4.5-year period. A medical record review helped isolate 29 (8.3%) magnet ingestions, 9 requiring surgical intervention. RedCap was used for analysis. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 9 surgical patients, 7 underwent SILS intervention by 1 surgeon. Another surgeon performed an open operation, whereas a third performed a multiport operation. Of the 7 SILS cases, 3 were completed without conversion to open. In one of these cases, bowel resection with primary anastomosis was performed. For SILS cases, average operating room time was 109 minutes (38-170 minutes), time to enteral feeds was 23 hours (0.28-79.2 hours), and hospital length of stay (LOS) was 3.8 days (1.96-6.68 days). Thirty-day readmission for SILS was 14.3%. No other complications were observed. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> SILS has been safely utilized for magnet retrieval. It offers an ability to identify the affected intestinal segment and an opportunity to intervene extracorporeally through an uncapped port. In addition, knowing where matted bowel is located can direct a limited incision during conversion to laparotomy. This may confer benefits of decreased pain, shortened time to enteral feeds, and decreased hospital LOS.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"530-534"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2023.0394","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A ban on neodymium magnets was lifted by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission in 2016. Pediatric gastroenterologists and surgeons were increasingly tasked with removing these problematic objects. The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) in the management of ingested magnets. Patients and Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective assessment of surgical interventions for ingested magnets. International Classification of Disease, 10th revision codes were used to identify 349 patients ≤21 years of age evaluated for foreign body ingestion over a 4.5-year period. A medical record review helped isolate 29 (8.3%) magnet ingestions, 9 requiring surgical intervention. RedCap was used for analysis. Results: Of 9 surgical patients, 7 underwent SILS intervention by 1 surgeon. Another surgeon performed an open operation, whereas a third performed a multiport operation. Of the 7 SILS cases, 3 were completed without conversion to open. In one of these cases, bowel resection with primary anastomosis was performed. For SILS cases, average operating room time was 109 minutes (38-170 minutes), time to enteral feeds was 23 hours (0.28-79.2 hours), and hospital length of stay (LOS) was 3.8 days (1.96-6.68 days). Thirty-day readmission for SILS was 14.3%. No other complications were observed. Conclusions: SILS has been safely utilized for magnet retrieval. It offers an ability to identify the affected intestinal segment and an opportunity to intervene extracorporeally through an uncapped port. In addition, knowing where matted bowel is located can direct a limited incision during conversion to laparotomy. This may confer benefits of decreased pain, shortened time to enteral feeds, and decreased hospital LOS.

单切口腹腔镜在处理误食磁铁中的应用。
背景:2016年,美国消费者产品安全委员会解除了对钕磁铁的禁令。儿科胃肠病学家和外科医生越来越多地负责清除这些有问题的物体。本研究的目的是评估单切口腹腔镜手术(SILS)在处理误食磁铁中的应用。患者和方法:这是一个单中心,回顾性评估手术干预摄入磁铁。使用国际疾病分类第10版修订代码对349例≤21岁的患者进行鉴定,评估其在4.5年期间内摄入异物。一项医疗记录审查帮助隔离了29例(8.3%)磁铁摄入,其中9例需要手术干预。使用RedCap进行分析。结果:9例手术患者中,7例由1名外科医生行SILS干预。另一名外科医生进行了开放手术,而第三名外科医生进行了多口手术。7例SILS中,3例完成手术,未转开。在这些病例中,进行了肠切除术和一期吻合。SILS病例平均手术室时间为109分钟(38 ~ 170分钟),肠内喂养时间为23小时(0.28 ~ 79.2小时),住院时间(LOS)为3.8天(1.96 ~ 6.68天)。30天再入院率为14.3%。无其他并发症。结论:SILS用于磁体回收是安全的。它提供了一种识别受影响肠段的能力,并有机会通过无帽端口进行体外干预。此外,了解肠结的位置可以指导在转换为剖腹手术时的有限切口。这可能会带来减轻疼痛、缩短肠内喂养时间和降低医院LOS的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信