[Historical and philosophical issues in animal experimentation].

Q4 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Biologie Aujourd''hui Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-29 DOI:10.1051/jbio/2023030
Georges Chapouthier
{"title":"[Historical and philosophical issues in animal experimentation].","authors":"Georges Chapouthier","doi":"10.1051/jbio/2023030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Initial practices involving experimentation with animals can be found in ancient Greece, but animal experimentation as understood in the modern world first emerged in the Renaissance. In the 19<sup>th</sup> century, the French scientist Claude Bernard analysed the basis for animal experimentation using the Cartesian philosophical concept of animals being equivalent to machines. Yet as Claude Bernard's work on biology developed, it showed that animals, in particular the so-called sentient animals, did have forms of sensitivity and consciousness similar to humans. This led to the present-day moral concern with animal experimentation. The moral argument is expressed in philosophical terms in the Universal Declaration of Animal Rights and the law known as the \"Three Rs\", while the practical measures for implementation are set out in the European Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes, and then as transposed and enforced in the different European Union Member States. This has led to improvements in the treatment of animals used for experimentation, and also allows scope for further improvements to be added in the future, particularly with alternative methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":39068,"journal":{"name":"Biologie Aujourd''hui","volume":"217 3-4","pages":"193-198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biologie Aujourd''hui","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/jbio/2023030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Initial practices involving experimentation with animals can be found in ancient Greece, but animal experimentation as understood in the modern world first emerged in the Renaissance. In the 19th century, the French scientist Claude Bernard analysed the basis for animal experimentation using the Cartesian philosophical concept of animals being equivalent to machines. Yet as Claude Bernard's work on biology developed, it showed that animals, in particular the so-called sentient animals, did have forms of sensitivity and consciousness similar to humans. This led to the present-day moral concern with animal experimentation. The moral argument is expressed in philosophical terms in the Universal Declaration of Animal Rights and the law known as the "Three Rs", while the practical measures for implementation are set out in the European Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes, and then as transposed and enforced in the different European Union Member States. This has led to improvements in the treatment of animals used for experimentation, and also allows scope for further improvements to be added in the future, particularly with alternative methods.

[动物实验中的历史和哲学问题]。
用动物做实验的最初做法可以在古希腊找到,但现代世界所理解的动物实验最早出现在文艺复兴时期。19世纪,法国科学家克劳德·伯纳德(Claude Bernard)利用笛卡尔(Cartesian)关于动物等同于机器的哲学概念,分析了动物实验的基础。然而,随着克劳德·伯纳德在生物学方面的研究的发展,它表明动物,特别是所谓的有知觉的动物,确实有类似于人类的敏感和意识形式。这导致了今天对动物实验的道德关注。道德论点在《世界动物权利宣言》和被称为“三个r”的法律中以哲学的方式表达,而实施的实际措施则在关于保护用于科学目的的动物的欧洲指令2010/63/EU中列出,然后在不同的欧盟成员国进行了转换和执行。这导致了对用于实验的动物的治疗的改进,并且也允许在未来进一步改进的空间,特别是使用替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biologie Aujourd''hui
Biologie Aujourd''hui Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信