Serological response and immune-related adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 9 2区 医学 Q1 VIROLOGY
Reviews in Medical Virology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-28 DOI:10.1002/rmv.2495
Yue Wang, Dong Chen, Yuancan Pan, Haiming Li, Weizhe Zhao, Taicheng Lu, Weijia Kong, Min Ding, Xiaomin Wang, Ganlin Zhang
{"title":"Serological response and immune-related adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yue Wang, Dong Chen, Yuancan Pan, Haiming Li, Weizhe Zhao, Taicheng Lu, Weijia Kong, Min Ding, Xiaomin Wang, Ganlin Zhang","doi":"10.1002/rmv.2495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the popularity of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine and the development of vaccination strategies, the impact of COVID-19 vaccine on cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is still unclear. In the systematic review and meta-analysis of patients with ICIs, we assessed the serological response of cancer patients receiving COVID-19 vaccine, and explored the risk of immune related adverse events (irAEs). We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library as of 10 June 2023, and included cancer patients who received ICIs and COVID-19 vaccine. The systematic review and meta-analysis include cohort study, cross-sectional study and case report. The outcome included the serological response, Spike-specific T-cell response, irAEs and rare adverse events. When possible, the data were analysed by random effect analysis, and the statistical heterogeneity was assessed by Q-test and I<sup>2</sup> statistics. We explored the sources of heterogeneity through L'Abbe plots, Galbraith radial plots, and sensitivity analysis. The publication bias was evaluated by Egger's, Begg's linear regression test and funnel plot, and the impact of publication bias was further analysed by trim and fill method. 27 studies were eligible (19 cohort studies, 1 cross-sectional study and 7 case reports), involving 8331 patients (with 4724 receiving ICIs). Most studies used mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273). Compared with cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, cancer patients receiving ICIs were significantly more likely to have seroconversion (RR = 1.05, 95%CI 1.01-1.10, P = 0.02). There were no statistically significant differences in seroconversion rates when comparing cancer patients receiving ICIs with controls without cancer (RR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.89-1.01, P = 0.09) or with cancer patients receiving targeted therapy (RR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.79-1.39, P = 0.75). The incidence of irAEs in patients receiving ICIs before and after COVID-19 vaccination was (21.96%, 95%CI 16.66%-28.94%) and (14.88%, 95%CI 8.65%-25.57%), respectively. The most common irAEs were endocrine abnormalities, skin disorders, etc. The certainty of evidence was low in cancer patients with ICIs, compared with those receiving chemotherapy, and very low versus controls without cancer. Cancer patients treated with ICIs seem to be able to receive COVID-19 vaccine safely without increasing the incidence of irAEs.</p>","PeriodicalId":21180,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Medical Virology","volume":" ","pages":"e2495"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Medical Virology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rmv.2495","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the popularity of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine and the development of vaccination strategies, the impact of COVID-19 vaccine on cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is still unclear. In the systematic review and meta-analysis of patients with ICIs, we assessed the serological response of cancer patients receiving COVID-19 vaccine, and explored the risk of immune related adverse events (irAEs). We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library as of 10 June 2023, and included cancer patients who received ICIs and COVID-19 vaccine. The systematic review and meta-analysis include cohort study, cross-sectional study and case report. The outcome included the serological response, Spike-specific T-cell response, irAEs and rare adverse events. When possible, the data were analysed by random effect analysis, and the statistical heterogeneity was assessed by Q-test and I2 statistics. We explored the sources of heterogeneity through L'Abbe plots, Galbraith radial plots, and sensitivity analysis. The publication bias was evaluated by Egger's, Begg's linear regression test and funnel plot, and the impact of publication bias was further analysed by trim and fill method. 27 studies were eligible (19 cohort studies, 1 cross-sectional study and 7 case reports), involving 8331 patients (with 4724 receiving ICIs). Most studies used mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273). Compared with cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, cancer patients receiving ICIs were significantly more likely to have seroconversion (RR = 1.05, 95%CI 1.01-1.10, P = 0.02). There were no statistically significant differences in seroconversion rates when comparing cancer patients receiving ICIs with controls without cancer (RR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.89-1.01, P = 0.09) or with cancer patients receiving targeted therapy (RR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.79-1.39, P = 0.75). The incidence of irAEs in patients receiving ICIs before and after COVID-19 vaccination was (21.96%, 95%CI 16.66%-28.94%) and (14.88%, 95%CI 8.65%-25.57%), respectively. The most common irAEs were endocrine abnormalities, skin disorders, etc. The certainty of evidence was low in cancer patients with ICIs, compared with those receiving chemotherapy, and very low versus controls without cancer. Cancer patients treated with ICIs seem to be able to receive COVID-19 vaccine safely without increasing the incidence of irAEs.

免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的癌症患者接种COVID-19疫苗后的血清学反应和免疫相关不良事件:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
随着2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫苗的普及和疫苗接种策略的发展,COVID-19疫苗对接受免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)治疗的癌症患者的影响尚不清楚。在ICIs患者的系统回顾和荟萃分析中,我们评估了接受COVID-19疫苗的癌症患者的血清学反应,并探讨了免疫相关不良事件(irAEs)的风险。我们检索了截至2023年6月10日的PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane Library,纳入了接受ICIs和COVID-19疫苗的癌症患者。系统评价和荟萃分析包括队列研究、横断面研究和病例报告。结果包括血清学反应、spike特异性t细胞反应、irae和罕见不良事件。尽可能采用随机效应分析,采用q检验和I2统计量评价统计异质性。我们通过L'Abbe图、Galbraith径向图和敏感性分析来探索异质性的来源。采用Egger’s、Begg’s线性回归检验和漏斗图评价发表偏倚,采用trim and fill法进一步分析发表偏倚的影响。纳入27项研究(19项队列研究、1项横断面研究和7例病例报告),涉及8331例患者(其中4724例接受了ICIs)。大多数研究使用mRNA疫苗(BNT162b2或mRNA-1273)。与接受化疗的癌症患者相比,接受ICIs的癌症患者血清转化的可能性显著增加(RR = 1.05, 95%CI 1.01-1.10, P = 0.02)。接受ICIs治疗的癌症患者与未患癌症的对照组(RR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.89-1.01, P = 0.09)或接受靶向治疗的癌症患者(RR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.79-1.39, P = 0.75)的血清转化率差异无统计学意义。接种COVID-19疫苗前后接受ICIs患者的irae发生率分别为(21.96%,95%CI 16.66% ~ 28.94%)和(14.88%,95%CI 8.65% ~ 25.57%)。最常见的是内分泌异常、皮肤病等。与接受化疗的癌症患者相比,有ICIs的癌症患者证据的确定性很低,与没有癌症的对照组相比,证据的确定性非常低。接受ICIs治疗的癌症患者似乎能够安全地接种COVID-19疫苗,而不会增加irae的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reviews in Medical Virology
Reviews in Medical Virology 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
0.90%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Reviews in Medical Virology aims to provide articles reviewing conceptual or technological advances in diverse areas of virology. The journal covers topics such as molecular biology, cell biology, replication, pathogenesis, immunology, immunization, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment of viruses of medical importance, and COVID-19 research. The journal has an Impact Factor of 6.989 for the year 2020. The readership of the journal includes clinicians, virologists, medical microbiologists, molecular biologists, infectious disease specialists, and immunologists. Reviews in Medical Virology is indexed and abstracted in databases such as CABI, Abstracts in Anthropology, ProQuest, Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed, ProQuest Central K-494, SCOPUS, and Web of Science et,al.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信