A tasty solution to packaging waste? Life cycle assessment of edible coffee cups

IF 11.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Keteki Anand , Andrés Martinez Arce , George Bishop , David Styles , Colin Fitzpatrick
{"title":"A tasty solution to packaging waste? Life cycle assessment of edible coffee cups","authors":"Keteki Anand ,&nbsp;Andrés Martinez Arce ,&nbsp;George Bishop ,&nbsp;David Styles ,&nbsp;Colin Fitzpatrick","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Edible cups have been proposed as a solution to littering and plastic pollution arising from disposal of 500 billion beverage cups each year. We applied life cycle assessment and a littering indicator to benchmark the environmental performance of edible cups against mainstream cup types made from paper, polylactic acid (PLA), polystyrene (PS) and reusable cups made from polypropylene (PP) and steel. Various end-of-life treatment scenarios were analysed. Across most impact categories, edible cups incur the largest burdens, and reusable cups the smallest (if reused at least 54 times). Under default assumptions, per cup use, climate change burdens ranged from 0.004 to 0.1 kg CO<sub>2</sub> equivalent, eutrophication burdens ranged from 6.26 × 10<sup>–6</sup> to 4.21 × 10<sup>–4</sup> kg N, fossil resource depletion burdens ranged from 0.05 to 0.284 MJ and water depletion burdens ranged from 0.002 to 0.437 m<sup>3</sup>. However, if edible cups are eaten after use <em>and</em> substitute a similar snack then their use could incur negligible environmental impact. Furthermore, edible cups demonstrate low littering potential and thus could play a role in transition towards more sustainable coffee consumption.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 107320"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344923004548/pdfft?md5=e41daa312f22b544bb09f40c78669a36&pid=1-s2.0-S0921344923004548-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344923004548","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Edible cups have been proposed as a solution to littering and plastic pollution arising from disposal of 500 billion beverage cups each year. We applied life cycle assessment and a littering indicator to benchmark the environmental performance of edible cups against mainstream cup types made from paper, polylactic acid (PLA), polystyrene (PS) and reusable cups made from polypropylene (PP) and steel. Various end-of-life treatment scenarios were analysed. Across most impact categories, edible cups incur the largest burdens, and reusable cups the smallest (if reused at least 54 times). Under default assumptions, per cup use, climate change burdens ranged from 0.004 to 0.1 kg CO2 equivalent, eutrophication burdens ranged from 6.26 × 10–6 to 4.21 × 10–4 kg N, fossil resource depletion burdens ranged from 0.05 to 0.284 MJ and water depletion burdens ranged from 0.002 to 0.437 m3. However, if edible cups are eaten after use and substitute a similar snack then their use could incur negligible environmental impact. Furthermore, edible cups demonstrate low littering potential and thus could play a role in transition towards more sustainable coffee consumption.

包装垃圾的美味解决方案?食用咖啡杯的生命周期评价
每年有5000亿个饮料杯被丢弃,可食用杯子被提议作为解决垃圾和塑料污染的办法。我们应用生命周期评估和垃圾指标,将可食用杯与主流的纸、聚乳酸(PLA)、聚苯乙烯(PS)和聚丙烯(PP)和钢制成的可重复使用杯的环保性能进行比较。分析了各种临终治疗方案。在大多数影响类别中,可食用杯子造成的负担最大,可重复使用杯子造成的负担最小(如果重复使用至少54次)。在默认假设下,每杯用水量的气候变化负担范围为0.004 ~ 0.1 kg CO2当量,富营养化负担范围为6.26 × 10-6 ~ 4.21 × 10-4 kg N,化石资源枯竭负担范围为0.05 ~ 0.284 MJ,水资源枯竭负担范围为0.002 ~ 0.437 m3。然而,如果可食用的杯子在使用后被吃掉,并用类似的零食代替,那么它们的使用对环境的影响可以忽略不计。此外,可食用杯子显示出低垃圾潜力,因此可以在向更可持续的咖啡消费过渡中发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信