Exploring crisis-driven return spillovers in APEC stock markets: A frequency dynamics analysis

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Shubham Kakran , Vineeta Kumari , Parminder Kaur Bajaj , Arpit Sidhu
{"title":"Exploring crisis-driven return spillovers in APEC stock markets: A frequency dynamics analysis","authors":"Shubham Kakran ,&nbsp;Vineeta Kumari ,&nbsp;Parminder Kaur Bajaj ,&nbsp;Arpit Sidhu","doi":"10.1016/j.jeca.2023.e00342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates return spillovers<span> in APEC region stock markets influenced by three major crises (the global financial crisis (GFC), the COVID-19 Pandemic, and the Russia- Ukraine conflict). The Diebold and Yilmaz (2012) approach with the Baruník and Křehlík (2018) methodology is employed. The results indicate that the spillover effect is crisis-sensitive, time-varying, and frequency-dependent across the APEC countries' equity markets. The GFC had the most significant spillover effect, followed by COVID-19 and the Russia-Ukraine conflict. While New Zealand, Vietnam, and the Philippines are the net risk recipients, the larger economies of the US, Canada, and Mexico are net risk contributors. Moreover, we analyzed return spillover across three different frequencies for three sub-periods, revealing that the GFC dominates short-term spillovers (five days/one week), while COVID-19 dominates long-term (above five days). Results reveal a fascinating aspect of hedging, highlighting that its costs are higher over the long term than the short term. Interestingly, hedging proves to be more effective over a long time, particularly during crises, thus emphasizing the crucial role played by the time-investment horizon factor.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":38259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Asymmetries","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article e00342"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Asymmetries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1703494923000543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates return spillovers in APEC region stock markets influenced by three major crises (the global financial crisis (GFC), the COVID-19 Pandemic, and the Russia- Ukraine conflict). The Diebold and Yilmaz (2012) approach with the Baruník and Křehlík (2018) methodology is employed. The results indicate that the spillover effect is crisis-sensitive, time-varying, and frequency-dependent across the APEC countries' equity markets. The GFC had the most significant spillover effect, followed by COVID-19 and the Russia-Ukraine conflict. While New Zealand, Vietnam, and the Philippines are the net risk recipients, the larger economies of the US, Canada, and Mexico are net risk contributors. Moreover, we analyzed return spillover across three different frequencies for three sub-periods, revealing that the GFC dominates short-term spillovers (five days/one week), while COVID-19 dominates long-term (above five days). Results reveal a fascinating aspect of hedging, highlighting that its costs are higher over the long term than the short term. Interestingly, hedging proves to be more effective over a long time, particularly during crises, thus emphasizing the crucial role played by the time-investment horizon factor.

探讨亚太经合组织股票市场危机驱动的回报溢出效应:频率动态分析
本研究探讨受三大危机(全球金融危机、新冠肺炎疫情和俄乌冲突)影响的亚太经合组织地区股票市场的回报溢出效应。采用Diebold和Yilmaz(2012)的方法和Baruník和Křehlík(2018)的方法。研究结果表明,亚太经合组织国家股票市场的溢出效应具有危机敏感性、时变性和频率依赖性。全球金融危机的溢出效应最为显著,其次是2019冠状病毒病和俄乌冲突。新西兰、越南和菲律宾是净风险接受国,而美国、加拿大和墨西哥等较大的经济体是净风险贡献者。此外,我们分析了三个子周期的三种不同频率的回报溢出效应,发现全球金融危机主导了短期溢出效应(五天/一周),而COVID-19主导了长期溢出效应(五天以上)。研究结果揭示了对冲的一个迷人之处,即其长期成本高于短期成本。有趣的是,对冲被证明在很长一段时间内更有效,特别是在危机期间,从而强调了时间投资范围因素所起的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Economic Asymmetries
Journal of Economic Asymmetries Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
50 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信