Factors influencing treatment response of pulmonary exacerbation in children with cystic fibrosis.

IF 1 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Minerva Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-28 DOI:10.23736/S2724-5276.23.07221-X
Jagdev Singh, Paul Robinson, Chetan Pandit, Brendan Kennedy, Beth Weldon, Brooke Bailey, Merilyn John, Dominic Fitzgerald, Hiran Selvadurai
{"title":"Factors influencing treatment response of pulmonary exacerbation in children with cystic fibrosis.","authors":"Jagdev Singh, Paul Robinson, Chetan Pandit, Brendan Kennedy, Beth Weldon, Brooke Bailey, Merilyn John, Dominic Fitzgerald, Hiran Selvadurai","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5276.23.07221-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis (CF) significantly impact morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to assess treatment response rates and identify contributing factors towards treatment response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center, retrospective, longitudinal study spanning four years, we analyzed all pulmonary exacerbation admissions. We compared lung function at baseline, admission, end of treatment, and 6-week follow-up. Treatment response was defined as ≥95% recovery of baseline FEV<inf>1</inf>%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 78 children who required a total of 184 admissions. The mean duration of treatment was 14.9±2.9 days. FEV<inf>1</inf>% returned to 95% of baseline in 59% following treatment. The magnitude of the decline in lung function on admission in children who did not respond to treatment was 21.7±15.2% while the decline in children who responded to treatment was 8.3±9.4%, P<0.001. Children who experienced a decline in FEV<inf>1</inf>% greater than 40% exhibited an 80% reduced likelihood of returning to their baseline values (OR -0.8, 95% CI -0.988; -0.612). Similarly, those with FEV<inf>1</inf>% reductions in the ranges of 30-39% (OR -0.63, 95% CI -0.821; -0.439), 20-29% (OR -0.52, 95% CI -0.657; -0.383), and 10-19% (OR -0.239, 95% CI -0.33; -0.148) showed progressively lower odds of returning to baseline. Fourty-eight children required readmission within 7.7±5.4 months, children who responded to treatment had a longer time taken to readmission (8.9±6.4 months) versus children who did not respond to treatment (6.4±3.5 months), (OR: -0.20, 95% CI -0.355; -0.048).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A greater decline in lung function on admission and readmission within 6 months of the initial admission predicts non-response to treatment. This highlights the importance of re-evaluating follow-up strategies following discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":56337,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5276.23.07221-X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis (CF) significantly impact morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to assess treatment response rates and identify contributing factors towards treatment response.

Methods: In this single-center, retrospective, longitudinal study spanning four years, we analyzed all pulmonary exacerbation admissions. We compared lung function at baseline, admission, end of treatment, and 6-week follow-up. Treatment response was defined as ≥95% recovery of baseline FEV1%.

Results: There were 78 children who required a total of 184 admissions. The mean duration of treatment was 14.9±2.9 days. FEV1% returned to 95% of baseline in 59% following treatment. The magnitude of the decline in lung function on admission in children who did not respond to treatment was 21.7±15.2% while the decline in children who responded to treatment was 8.3±9.4%, P<0.001. Children who experienced a decline in FEV1% greater than 40% exhibited an 80% reduced likelihood of returning to their baseline values (OR -0.8, 95% CI -0.988; -0.612). Similarly, those with FEV1% reductions in the ranges of 30-39% (OR -0.63, 95% CI -0.821; -0.439), 20-29% (OR -0.52, 95% CI -0.657; -0.383), and 10-19% (OR -0.239, 95% CI -0.33; -0.148) showed progressively lower odds of returning to baseline. Fourty-eight children required readmission within 7.7±5.4 months, children who responded to treatment had a longer time taken to readmission (8.9±6.4 months) versus children who did not respond to treatment (6.4±3.5 months), (OR: -0.20, 95% CI -0.355; -0.048).

Conclusions: A greater decline in lung function on admission and readmission within 6 months of the initial admission predicts non-response to treatment. This highlights the importance of re-evaluating follow-up strategies following discharge.

影响囊性纤维化患儿肺加重治疗反应的因素。
背景:囊性纤维化(CF)的肺恶化显著影响发病率和死亡率。本研究旨在评估治疗反应率,并确定影响治疗反应的因素。方法:在这项跨越四年的单中心、回顾性、纵向研究中,我们分析了所有肺部恶化入院病例。我们比较了基线、入院、治疗结束和6周随访时的肺功能。治疗缓解定义为基线FEV1%恢复≥95%。结果:78名患儿共184次就诊。平均治疗时间14.9±2.9 d。治疗后59%的FEV1%恢复到基线的95%。治疗无效的患儿入院时肺功能下降幅度为21.7±15.2%,而治疗有效的患儿入院时肺功能下降幅度为8.3±9.4%,1%大于40%,恢复到基线值的可能性降低80% (OR -0.8, 95% CI -0.988;-0.612)。同样,FEV1%的患者在30-39%的范围内(OR -0.63, 95% CI -0.821;-0.439), 20-29% (or -0.52, 95% ci -0.657;-0.383), 10-19% (OR -0.239, 95% CI -0.33;-0.148)显示回归基线的几率逐渐降低。48名患儿需要在7.7±5.4个月内再入院,治疗有反应的患儿再入院时间(8.9±6.4个月)比治疗无反应的患儿(6.4±3.5个月)更长,(OR: -0.20, 95% CI -0.355;-0.048)。结论:入院时肺功能下降较大,入院后6个月内再入院预示治疗无反应。这突出了出院后重新评估后续战略的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
294
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信