Creating synergies among education/research, practice, and policy environments to build capacity for the scholar role in occupational therapy and physiotherapy in the Canadian context

IF 3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Sungha Kim, Annie Rochette, Sara Ahmed, Philippe S. Archambault, Claudine Auger, Alex Battaglini, Andrew R. Freeman, Eva Kehayia, Elizabeth Anne Kinsella, Elinor Larney, Lori Letts, Peter Nugus, Marie-Hélène Raymond, Nancy M. Salbach, Diana Sinnige, Laurie Snider, Bonnie Swaine, Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme, Aliki Thomas
{"title":"Creating synergies among education/research, practice, and policy environments to build capacity for the scholar role in occupational therapy and physiotherapy in the Canadian context","authors":"Sungha Kim,&nbsp;Annie Rochette,&nbsp;Sara Ahmed,&nbsp;Philippe S. Archambault,&nbsp;Claudine Auger,&nbsp;Alex Battaglini,&nbsp;Andrew R. Freeman,&nbsp;Eva Kehayia,&nbsp;Elizabeth Anne Kinsella,&nbsp;Elinor Larney,&nbsp;Lori Letts,&nbsp;Peter Nugus,&nbsp;Marie-Hélène Raymond,&nbsp;Nancy M. Salbach,&nbsp;Diana Sinnige,&nbsp;Laurie Snider,&nbsp;Bonnie Swaine,&nbsp;Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme,&nbsp;Aliki Thomas","doi":"10.1007/s10459-023-10298-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Scholarly practice (SP) is considered a key competency of occupational therapy and physiotherapy. To date, the three sectors—education/research, practice, and policy/regulation—that support SP have been working relatively independently. The goals of this project were to (a) understand how representatives of the three sectors conceptualize SP; (b) define each sector’s individual and collective roles in supporting SP; (c) identify factors influencing the enactment of SP and the specific needs of how best to support SP; and (d) co-develop goals and strategies to support SP across all sectors. We used interpretive description methodology. Consistent with an integrated knowledge translation approach, partners representing the three sectors across Canada recruited individuals from each sector, developed the content and questions for three focus groups, and collected and analyzed the data. Inspired by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we developed the questions for the second focus group. We analyzed the data using an inductive thematic analysis method. Thirty-nine participants from the three sectors participated. Themes related to participants’ conceptualization of SP included (a) ongoing process, (b) reflective process, (c) broad concept, and (d) collective effort. Themes describing factors influencing and supporting SP were (a) recognition, (b) appropriate conceptualization, (c) social network, (d) accessibility to resources, and (e) forces outside of practitioners’ effort. Goals to support SP included (a) further recognizing SP, (b) sustaining SP competency, and (c) ensuring access to information. SP requires collaborative and integrated intersectoral support and further recognition of its importance through the collaboration of multiple stakeholders.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":"29 4","pages":"1169 - 1198"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10459-023-10298-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scholarly practice (SP) is considered a key competency of occupational therapy and physiotherapy. To date, the three sectors—education/research, practice, and policy/regulation—that support SP have been working relatively independently. The goals of this project were to (a) understand how representatives of the three sectors conceptualize SP; (b) define each sector’s individual and collective roles in supporting SP; (c) identify factors influencing the enactment of SP and the specific needs of how best to support SP; and (d) co-develop goals and strategies to support SP across all sectors. We used interpretive description methodology. Consistent with an integrated knowledge translation approach, partners representing the three sectors across Canada recruited individuals from each sector, developed the content and questions for three focus groups, and collected and analyzed the data. Inspired by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we developed the questions for the second focus group. We analyzed the data using an inductive thematic analysis method. Thirty-nine participants from the three sectors participated. Themes related to participants’ conceptualization of SP included (a) ongoing process, (b) reflective process, (c) broad concept, and (d) collective effort. Themes describing factors influencing and supporting SP were (a) recognition, (b) appropriate conceptualization, (c) social network, (d) accessibility to resources, and (e) forces outside of practitioners’ effort. Goals to support SP included (a) further recognizing SP, (b) sustaining SP competency, and (c) ensuring access to information. SP requires collaborative and integrated intersectoral support and further recognition of its importance through the collaboration of multiple stakeholders.

Abstract Image

在教育/研究、实践和政策环境之间建立协同作用,以建立加拿大职业治疗和物理治疗中学者角色的能力。
学术实践(SP)被认为是职业治疗和物理治疗的关键能力。迄今为止,支持SP的三个部门——教育/研究、实践和政策/法规——一直相对独立地工作。该项目的目标是(a)了解三个部门的代表如何概念化SP;(b)界定界别在支援特殊服务方面的个别及集体角色;(c)找出影响制订可持续发展计划的因素,以及如何最有效地支持可持续发展计划的具体需要;(d)共同制定目标和战略,以支持所有部门的可持续发展战略。我们采用解释性描述方法。根据综合知识翻译方法,代表加拿大三个部门的合作伙伴从每个部门招募人员,为三个焦点小组开发内容和问题,并收集和分析数据。受《实施研究综合框架》的启发,我们为第二个焦点小组制定了问题。我们使用归纳主题分析法对数据进行分析。来自三个界别的三十九名代表参加了会议。与参与者对SP概念化相关的主题包括(a)持续过程,(b)反思过程,(c)广义概念和(d)集体努力。描述影响和支持SP的因素的主题是(a)认识,(b)适当的概念化,(c)社会网络,(d)资源的可及性,以及(e)从业者努力之外的力量。支持SP的目标包括(a)进一步认可SP, (b)维持SP的能力,(c)确保获取信息。安全措施需要协作和综合的部门间支持,并通过多个利益攸关方的合作进一步认识到其重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Health Sciences Education is a forum for scholarly and state-of-the art research into all aspects of health sciences education. It will publish empirical studies as well as discussions of theoretical issues and practical implications. The primary focus of the Journal is linking theory to practice, thus priority will be given to papers that have a sound theoretical basis and strong methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信