Effectiveness of Dyadic Psychoeducational Intervention on Cancer Patients and Their Caregivers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Cancer Nursing Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-27 DOI:10.1097/NCC.0000000000001307
Daoming Chen, Qing Liu, Linlin Zhang, Hongying Qian
{"title":"Effectiveness of Dyadic Psychoeducational Intervention on Cancer Patients and Their Caregivers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Daoming Chen, Qing Liu, Linlin Zhang, Hongying Qian","doi":"10.1097/NCC.0000000000001307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dyadic psychoeducational intervention targets the dyads of cancer patients and caregivers as active participants in partnership, which can potentially address the needs and challenges faced by patients with cancer and their caregivers. However, there is insufficient evidence on the effectiveness of the intervention on psychological health and illness-related outcomes among the dyads.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically examine the dyadic psychoeducational intervention of cancer patients and their caregivers on psychological health and illness-related outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, Web of Science, and 4 Chinese databases were searched from inception to May 29, 2022. Two investigators independently extracted data and evaluated methodological quality. RevMan 5.4 was used for meta-analysis; heterogeneity was evaluated using Higgins' I2 (%). Standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to assess the effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight randomized controlled trials that involved 1234 dyads were collected. Meta-analysis showed that the intervention was effective in reducing the dyadic depression (patients' SMD, -0.41 [95% CI, -0.78 to -0.04; P = .03]; caregivers' SMD, -0.70 [95% CI, -1.31 to -0.09; P = .03]). It also improved caregivers' quality of life (SMD, -0.29 [95% CI, -0.56 to -0.03; P = .03]), whereas no significant effect was found on patients' quality of life. Dyadic results including anxiety, self-efficacy, disease communication, and appraisals of illness/caregiving were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dyadic psychoeducational intervention reduced the dyadic depression. It also improved caregivers' quality of life.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Nurses can apply dyadic psychoeducational intervention in clinical practice. More studies are needed to draw higher-quality conclusions and investigate the effects on psychological health and illness-related outcomes in cancer patients and caregivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":50713,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"316-326"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000001307","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dyadic psychoeducational intervention targets the dyads of cancer patients and caregivers as active participants in partnership, which can potentially address the needs and challenges faced by patients with cancer and their caregivers. However, there is insufficient evidence on the effectiveness of the intervention on psychological health and illness-related outcomes among the dyads.

Objective: To systematically examine the dyadic psychoeducational intervention of cancer patients and their caregivers on psychological health and illness-related outcomes.

Methods: Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, Web of Science, and 4 Chinese databases were searched from inception to May 29, 2022. Two investigators independently extracted data and evaluated methodological quality. RevMan 5.4 was used for meta-analysis; heterogeneity was evaluated using Higgins' I2 (%). Standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to assess the effects.

Results: Eight randomized controlled trials that involved 1234 dyads were collected. Meta-analysis showed that the intervention was effective in reducing the dyadic depression (patients' SMD, -0.41 [95% CI, -0.78 to -0.04; P = .03]; caregivers' SMD, -0.70 [95% CI, -1.31 to -0.09; P = .03]). It also improved caregivers' quality of life (SMD, -0.29 [95% CI, -0.56 to -0.03; P = .03]), whereas no significant effect was found on patients' quality of life. Dyadic results including anxiety, self-efficacy, disease communication, and appraisals of illness/caregiving were observed.

Conclusion: Dyadic psychoeducational intervention reduced the dyadic depression. It also improved caregivers' quality of life.

Implications for practice: Nurses can apply dyadic psychoeducational intervention in clinical practice. More studies are needed to draw higher-quality conclusions and investigate the effects on psychological health and illness-related outcomes in cancer patients and caregivers.

双重心理教育干预对癌症患者及其照顾者的有效性:系统回顾和meta分析。
背景:二元心理教育干预的目标是将癌症患者和照顾者作为积极的伙伴关系参与者,这可以潜在地解决癌症患者及其照顾者面临的需求和挑战。然而,没有足够的证据表明干预对二人组的心理健康和疾病相关结果的有效性。目的:系统探讨双重心理教育干预对癌症患者及其照顾者心理健康和疾病相关结局的影响。方法:检索Cochrane Library、EMBASE、CINAHL、PsycINFO、PubMed、Web of Science及4个中文数据库,检索时间为建库至2022年5月29日。两名研究者独立提取数据并评估方法学质量。采用RevMan 5.4进行meta分析;采用Higgins I2(%)评价异质性。采用95%置信区间(CI)的标准化平均差(SMD)来评估效果。结果:共收集8项随机对照试验,涉及1234对。荟萃分析显示,干预可有效减少双相抑郁(患者的SMD, -0.41 [95% CI, -0.78 ~ -0.04;P = .03];护理人员的SMD, -0.70 [95% CI, -1.31至-0.09;P = .03])。它还改善了护理者的生活质量(SMD, -0.29 [95% CI, -0.56至-0.03;P = .03]),而对患者生活质量无显著影响。观察到双重结果,包括焦虑、自我效能、疾病沟通和疾病/护理评估。结论:双重心理教育干预可减轻双重抑郁。它还提高了照顾者的生活质量。对实践的启示:护士可以在临床实践中运用二元心理教育干预。需要更多的研究来得出更高质量的结论,并调查对癌症患者和护理人员的心理健康和疾病相关结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Nursing
Cancer Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
244
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Each bimonthly issue of Cancer Nursing™ addresses the whole spectrum of problems arising in the care and support of cancer patients--prevention and early detection, geriatric and pediatric cancer nursing, medical and surgical oncology, ambulatory care, nutritional support, psychosocial aspects of cancer, patient responses to all treatment modalities, and specific nursing interventions. The journal offers unparalleled coverage of cancer care delivery practices worldwide, as well as groundbreaking research findings and their practical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信