Basal or stimulated thyroglobulin in evaluating response to treatment in papillary thyroid carcinoma? A retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Leticia Barreto, Deborah Cristina Goulart Ferreira, José Eduardo Corrente, Carlos Segundo Paiva Soares, Cristiano Claudino Oliveira, Simone Antunes Terra, Sonia Marta Moriguchi, Katia Hiromoto Koga, José Vicente Tagliarini, Gláucia Maria Ferreira da Silva Mazeto
{"title":"Basal or stimulated thyroglobulin in evaluating response to treatment in papillary thyroid carcinoma? A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Leticia Barreto, Deborah Cristina Goulart Ferreira, José Eduardo Corrente, Carlos Segundo Paiva Soares, Cristiano Claudino Oliveira, Simone Antunes Terra, Sonia Marta Moriguchi, Katia Hiromoto Koga, José Vicente Tagliarini, Gláucia Maria Ferreira da Silva Mazeto","doi":"10.1007/s42000-023-00503-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>It is not clear whether response to initial treatment in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) patients is best evaluated by measuring thyroglobulin (Tg) in the presence of levothyroxine (BTg) or when stimulated by elevated TSH (STg). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether response to therapy 1 year after initial treatment changes with the use of STg in relation to BTg in PTC patients treated with total thyroidectomy (TT) and radioiodine (<sup>131</sup>I), and, if observed, to assess which response is better associated with clinical course.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study of 148 PTC patients submitted to TT and <sup>131</sup>I. We analyzed the response to therapy (excellent, biochemical incomplete, or indeterminate) at 1 year after initial treatment, using BTg or STg, and compared which method was better associated with \"excellent response at final evaluation.\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight patients (20.4%) presented change in response to therapy, with 17 of these (60.7%) presenting a worse response. Response using STg was 1.6 times better associated with proposed outcome [odds ratio (OR) = 4.61; confidence interval 95% (IC95%): 2.13-9.98] than with BTg (OR = 2.84; IC95%: 1.33-6.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Response to therapy at 1 year using STg was altered in approximately 20% of cases and therefore proved to be a better predictor of excellent response in the last evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50399,"journal":{"name":"Hormones-International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"97-106"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hormones-International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42000-023-00503-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: It is not clear whether response to initial treatment in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) patients is best evaluated by measuring thyroglobulin (Tg) in the presence of levothyroxine (BTg) or when stimulated by elevated TSH (STg). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether response to therapy 1 year after initial treatment changes with the use of STg in relation to BTg in PTC patients treated with total thyroidectomy (TT) and radioiodine (131I), and, if observed, to assess which response is better associated with clinical course.

Subjects and methods: This is a retrospective study of 148 PTC patients submitted to TT and 131I. We analyzed the response to therapy (excellent, biochemical incomplete, or indeterminate) at 1 year after initial treatment, using BTg or STg, and compared which method was better associated with "excellent response at final evaluation."

Results: Twenty-eight patients (20.4%) presented change in response to therapy, with 17 of these (60.7%) presenting a worse response. Response using STg was 1.6 times better associated with proposed outcome [odds ratio (OR) = 4.61; confidence interval 95% (IC95%): 2.13-9.98] than with BTg (OR = 2.84; IC95%: 1.33-6.06).

Conclusion: Response to therapy at 1 year using STg was altered in approximately 20% of cases and therefore proved to be a better predictor of excellent response in the last evaluation.

Abstract Image

基础或刺激甲状腺球蛋白评价甲状腺乳头状癌治疗效果?回顾性队列研究。
目的:目前尚不清楚是在左甲状腺素(BTg)存在时测量甲状腺球蛋白(Tg)还是在TSH升高(STg)刺激下测量甲状腺球蛋白(Tg)来评估乳头状甲状腺癌(PTC)患者对初始治疗的反应。本研究的目的是评估接受甲状腺全切除术(TT)和放射性碘(131I)治疗的PTC患者,在初始治疗1年后,使用STg和BTg是否会改变对治疗的反应,如果观察到,评估哪种反应与临床病程的关系更好。对象和方法:本研究是对148例接受TT和131I治疗的PTC患者的回顾性研究。我们分析了初始治疗1年后使用BTg或STg对治疗的反应(良好,生化不完全或不确定),并比较了哪种方法与“最终评估的良好反应”更相关。结果:28例(20.4%)患者对治疗反应发生变化,其中17例(60.7%)患者反应较差。使用STg的反应与预期结果的相关性提高了1.6倍[优势比(OR) = 4.61;可信区间95% (IC95%): 2.13-9.98],高于BTg (OR = 2.84;IC95%: 1.33 - -6.06)。结论:大约20%的病例在使用STg 1年后对治疗的反应发生了改变,因此在最后一次评估中被证明是一个更好的预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Hormones-International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism is an international journal published quarterly with an international editorial board aiming at providing a forum covering all fields of endocrinology and metabolic disorders such as disruption of glucose homeostasis (diabetes mellitus), impaired homeostasis of plasma lipids (dyslipidemia), the disorder of bone metabolism (osteoporosis), disturbances of endocrine function and reproductive capacity of women and men. Hormones-International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism particularly encourages clinical, translational and basic science submissions in the areas of endocrine cancers, nutrition, obesity and metabolic disorders, quality of life of endocrine diseases, epidemiology of endocrine and metabolic disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信