The effect of intervention programs on road traffic injury prevention among adolescents and young people: a systematic review.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Fatemeh Malekpour, Maryam Afshari, Seyedeh Melikah Kharghani Moghadam, Zahra Cheraghi, Saeed Bashirian, Babak Moeini, Forouzan Rezapur-Shahkolai
{"title":"The effect of intervention programs on road traffic injury prevention among adolescents and young people: a systematic review.","authors":"Fatemeh Malekpour, Maryam Afshari, Seyedeh Melikah Kharghani Moghadam, Zahra Cheraghi, Saeed Bashirian, Babak Moeini, Forouzan Rezapur-Shahkolai","doi":"10.1080/17457300.2023.2286639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Road traffic injuries (RTIs) are a significant cause of death and disability among young people worldwide. Programs that use injury prevention strategies have been shown to effectively reduce the number of injuries. This systematic review aims to present the available evidence on the effectiveness of intervention programs in preventing RTIs among adolescents and young adults. Articles were identified and retrieved from databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct, Magiran, SID, and Iran Medex. Two reviewers independently screened the articles. Articles published from the first year of publication until January 2018 that met the eligibility criteria were included in the review. These articles covered randomized controlled trials, pretest/post-test interventions, and controlled pretest/post-test interventions aimed at reducing RTIs among adolescents and young people aged 12-26 years. The framework, provided by Murphy and Haddon, were used to categorize the interventions. According to this framework, the interventions were categorized into five groups including education/behavior change, incentive, engineering/technology, legislation/enforcement, and multifaceted programs. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project. Of the initial 3165 findings, 13 studies met the inclusion criteria. Eleven of these studies used educational/behavioral approaches, while two employed multifaceted programs. In the educational/behavioral approach, participants' behaviors were considered as outcome variables. Only one of these studies was not successful. Multifaceted interventions were successful in changing behaviors. No studies were found on the effectiveness of other interventions. Eight studies were assessed as having moderate quality. The systematic review shows that educational/behavioral strategies and multifaceted programs are effective in reducing RTIs among young adults and adolescents. However, there is a lack of studies on other potential interventions. The quality of the included studies was moderate, suggesting a need for more rigorous research.</p>","PeriodicalId":47014,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17457300.2023.2286639","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Road traffic injuries (RTIs) are a significant cause of death and disability among young people worldwide. Programs that use injury prevention strategies have been shown to effectively reduce the number of injuries. This systematic review aims to present the available evidence on the effectiveness of intervention programs in preventing RTIs among adolescents and young adults. Articles were identified and retrieved from databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct, Magiran, SID, and Iran Medex. Two reviewers independently screened the articles. Articles published from the first year of publication until January 2018 that met the eligibility criteria were included in the review. These articles covered randomized controlled trials, pretest/post-test interventions, and controlled pretest/post-test interventions aimed at reducing RTIs among adolescents and young people aged 12-26 years. The framework, provided by Murphy and Haddon, were used to categorize the interventions. According to this framework, the interventions were categorized into five groups including education/behavior change, incentive, engineering/technology, legislation/enforcement, and multifaceted programs. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project. Of the initial 3165 findings, 13 studies met the inclusion criteria. Eleven of these studies used educational/behavioral approaches, while two employed multifaceted programs. In the educational/behavioral approach, participants' behaviors were considered as outcome variables. Only one of these studies was not successful. Multifaceted interventions were successful in changing behaviors. No studies were found on the effectiveness of other interventions. Eight studies were assessed as having moderate quality. The systematic review shows that educational/behavioral strategies and multifaceted programs are effective in reducing RTIs among young adults and adolescents. However, there is a lack of studies on other potential interventions. The quality of the included studies was moderate, suggesting a need for more rigorous research.

干预方案对预防青少年道路交通伤害的影响:一项系统综述。
道路交通伤害是全世界年轻人死亡和残疾的一个重要原因。使用伤害预防策略的项目已被证明可以有效地减少伤害的数量。本系统综述旨在提供有关干预方案在青少年和年轻人中预防RTIs有效性的现有证据。文章从PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus、Science Direct、Magiran、SID和Iran Medex等数据库中进行识别和检索。两名审稿人独立筛选了这些文章。从出版的第一年到2018年1月,符合资格标准的文章被纳入审查。这些文章涵盖了随机对照试验、测试前/测试后干预和控制测试前/测试后干预,旨在减少青少年和12-26岁年轻人的rti。该框架由Murphy和Haddon提供,用于对干预措施进行分类。根据这一框架,干预措施被分为五组,包括教育/行为改变、激励、工程/技术、立法/执法和多方面的计划。使用有效公共卫生实践项目评估了研究的方法学质量。在最初的3165项发现中,有13项研究符合纳入标准。其中11项研究使用了教育/行为方法,而两项研究采用了多方面的方案。在教育/行为方法中,参与者的行为被视为结果变量。这些研究中只有一项没有成功。多方面的干预在改变行为方面是成功的。没有研究发现其他干预措施的有效性。8项研究被评估为中等质量。系统回顾表明,教育/行为策略和多方面的计划在减少年轻人和青少年的rti方面是有效的。然而,缺乏对其他潜在干预措施的研究。纳入的研究质量一般,表明需要进行更严格的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion
International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
13.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion (formerly Injury Control and Safety Promotion) publishes articles concerning all phases of injury control, including prevention, acute care and rehabilitation. Specifically, this journal will publish articles that for each type of injury: •describe the problem •analyse the causes and risk factors •discuss the design and evaluation of solutions •describe the implementation of effective programs and policies The journal encompasses all causes of fatal and non-fatal injury, including injuries related to: •transport •school and work •home and leisure activities •sport •violence and assault
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信