Computed Tomography-Based Radiomics Signature for Predicting Segmental Chromosomal Aberrations at 1p36 and 11q23 in Pediatric Neuroblastoma.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Haoru Wang, Chunlin Yu, Hao Ding, Li Zhang, Xin Chen, Ling He
{"title":"Computed Tomography-Based Radiomics Signature for Predicting Segmental Chromosomal Aberrations at 1p36 and 11q23 in Pediatric Neuroblastoma.","authors":"Haoru Wang, Chunlin Yu, Hao Ding, Li Zhang, Xin Chen, Ling He","doi":"10.1097/RCT.0000000000001564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop and assess the precision of a radiomics signature based on computed tomography imaging for predicting segmental chromosomal aberrations (SCAs) status at 1p36 and 11q23 in neuroblastoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty-seven pediatric patients diagnosed with neuroblastoma and with confirmed genetic testing for SCAs status at 1p36 and 11q23 were enrolled and randomly stratified into a training set and a test set. Radiomics features were extracted from 3-phase computed tomography images and analyzed using various statistical methods. An optimal set of radiomics features was selected using a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model to calculate the radiomics score for each patient. The radiomics signature was validated using receiver operating characteristic curves to obtain the area under the curve and 95% confidence interval (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight radiomics features were carefully selected and used to compute the radiomics score, which demonstrated a statistically significant distinction between the SCAs and non-SCAs groups in both sets. The radiomics signature achieved an area under the curve of 0.869 (95% CI, 0.788-0.943) and 0.883 (95% CI, 0.753-0.978) in the training and test sets, respectively. The accuracy of the radiomics signature was 0.817 and 0.778 in the training and test sets, respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test confirmed that the radiomics signature was well calibrated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Computed tomography-based radiomics signature has the potential to predict SCAs at 1p36 and 11q23 in neuroblastoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":15402,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","volume":" ","pages":"472-479"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001564","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to develop and assess the precision of a radiomics signature based on computed tomography imaging for predicting segmental chromosomal aberrations (SCAs) status at 1p36 and 11q23 in neuroblastoma.

Methods: Eighty-seven pediatric patients diagnosed with neuroblastoma and with confirmed genetic testing for SCAs status at 1p36 and 11q23 were enrolled and randomly stratified into a training set and a test set. Radiomics features were extracted from 3-phase computed tomography images and analyzed using various statistical methods. An optimal set of radiomics features was selected using a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model to calculate the radiomics score for each patient. The radiomics signature was validated using receiver operating characteristic curves to obtain the area under the curve and 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results: Eight radiomics features were carefully selected and used to compute the radiomics score, which demonstrated a statistically significant distinction between the SCAs and non-SCAs groups in both sets. The radiomics signature achieved an area under the curve of 0.869 (95% CI, 0.788-0.943) and 0.883 (95% CI, 0.753-0.978) in the training and test sets, respectively. The accuracy of the radiomics signature was 0.817 and 0.778 in the training and test sets, respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test confirmed that the radiomics signature was well calibrated.

Conclusions: Computed tomography-based radiomics signature has the potential to predict SCAs at 1p36 and 11q23 in neuroblastoma.

基于计算机断层扫描的放射组学特征预测儿童神经母细胞瘤1p36和11q23染色体段性畸变
目的:本研究旨在开发和评估基于计算机断层扫描成像的放射组学特征的准确性,以预测神经母细胞瘤中1p36和11q23的片段性染色体畸变(SCAs)状态。方法:入选87例确诊为神经母细胞瘤并经基因检测确认为1p36和11q23位点SCAs状态的儿童患者,随机分为训练组和测试组。从三相计算机断层扫描图像中提取放射组学特征,并使用各种统计方法进行分析。使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归模型选择一组最佳放射组学特征来计算每个患者的放射组学评分。使用受试者工作特征曲线验证放射组学特征,以获得曲线下面积和95%置信区间(CI)。结果:八个放射组学特征被仔细选择并用于计算放射组学评分,这表明在两组SCAs组和非SCAs组之间存在统计学上的显著差异。放射组学特征在训练集和测试集的曲线下面积分别为0.869 (95% CI, 0.788-0.943)和0.883 (95% CI, 0.753-0.978)。训练集和测试集放射组学特征的准确率分别为0.817和0.778。Hosmer-Lemeshow测试证实了放射组学特征被很好地校准。结论:基于计算机断层扫描的放射组学特征有可能预测神经母细胞瘤中1p36和11q23处的SCAs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
230
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography is to showcase the latest clinical and research developments in CT, MR, and closely related diagnostic techniques. We encourage submission of both original research and review articles that have immediate or promissory clinical applications. Topics of special interest include: 1) functional MR and CT of the brain and body; 2) advanced/innovative MRI techniques (diffusion, perfusion, rapid scanning); and 3) advanced/innovative CT techniques (perfusion, multi-energy, dose-reduction, and processing).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信