Reconsidering FDA Guidelines: A Single-Center Experience of Prolonged Impella 5.5 Support.

IF 1.6 Q2 SURGERY
Carlos Alberto Valdes, Griffin Stinson, Omar M Sharaf, Fabian Jimenez Contreras, Ahmet Bilgili, Mustafa M Ahmed, Juan Vilaro, Alex M Parker, Mohammad A Z Al-Ani, Daniel Demos, Juan Aranda, Mark Bleiweis, Thomas M Beaver, Eric I Jeng
{"title":"Reconsidering FDA Guidelines: A Single-Center Experience of Prolonged Impella 5.5 Support.","authors":"Carlos Alberto Valdes, Griffin Stinson, Omar M Sharaf, Fabian Jimenez Contreras, Ahmet Bilgili, Mustafa M Ahmed, Juan Vilaro, Alex M Parker, Mohammad A Z Al-Ani, Daniel Demos, Juan Aranda, Mark Bleiweis, Thomas M Beaver, Eric I Jeng","doi":"10.1177/15569845231212157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Impella 5.5 (Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA) is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for mechanical circulatory support for ≤14 days. It is unknown whether prolonged support is associated with worse outcomes. We sought to review our single-center experience with Impella 5.5 and compare outcomes based on support duration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed adult patients (≥18 years old) supported with Impella 5.5 at our institution (May 2020 to April 2023). Patients on prolonged support (>14 days) were compared with those supported for ≤14 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 31 patients supported with Impella 5.5 including 14 (45.2%) supported >14 days. Median support duration for those on prolonged support was 43.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 25 to 63.5) days versus 8 (IQR 6, 13) days for those who were not (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Overall, the device-related complication rate was 9.7% and did not differ between groups (<i>P</i> = 0.08). Overall, 30-day postimplant survival was 71% and did not differ by support duration (<i>P</i> = 0.2). In-hospital mortality was 32% and did not differ between cohorts (<i>P</i> > 0.99). Among those surviving to explant (<i>n</i> = 22), long-term strategy included bridge to durable ventricular assist device (18%, <i>n</i> = 4), cardiac transplant (55%, <i>n</i> = 12), and cardiac recovery (27%, <i>n</i> = 6).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High-risk patients with cardiogenic shock may be supported with Impella 5.5 beyond the FDA-approved duration without increased risk of complications or mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":13574,"journal":{"name":"Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"46-53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15569845231212157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Impella 5.5 (Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA) is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for mechanical circulatory support for ≤14 days. It is unknown whether prolonged support is associated with worse outcomes. We sought to review our single-center experience with Impella 5.5 and compare outcomes based on support duration.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed adult patients (≥18 years old) supported with Impella 5.5 at our institution (May 2020 to April 2023). Patients on prolonged support (>14 days) were compared with those supported for ≤14 days.

Results: There were 31 patients supported with Impella 5.5 including 14 (45.2%) supported >14 days. Median support duration for those on prolonged support was 43.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 25 to 63.5) days versus 8 (IQR 6, 13) days for those who were not (P < 0.001). Overall, the device-related complication rate was 9.7% and did not differ between groups (P = 0.08). Overall, 30-day postimplant survival was 71% and did not differ by support duration (P = 0.2). In-hospital mortality was 32% and did not differ between cohorts (P > 0.99). Among those surviving to explant (n = 22), long-term strategy included bridge to durable ventricular assist device (18%, n = 4), cardiac transplant (55%, n = 12), and cardiac recovery (27%, n = 6).

Conclusions: High-risk patients with cardiogenic shock may be supported with Impella 5.5 beyond the FDA-approved duration without increased risk of complications or mortality.

重新考虑FDA指南:延长Impella 5.5支持的单中心经验。
目的:Impella 5.5 (Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA)被美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准用于≤14天的机械循环支持。目前尚不清楚延长支持是否与较差的结果有关。我们试图回顾我们使用Impella 5.5的单中心体验,并根据支持时间比较结果。方法:我们回顾性分析了我院(2020年5月至2023年4月)使用Impella 5.5的成年患者(≥18岁)。将延长支持(>14天)的患者与≤14天的患者进行比较。结果:31例患者支持Impella 5.5,其中14例(45.2%)支持>14天。延长支持组的中位支持持续时间为43.5天(四分位数间距[IQR] 25至63.5),而未延长支持组的中位支持持续时间为8天(IQR为6,13)(P < 0.001)。总体而言,器械相关并发症发生率为9.7%,两组间无差异(P = 0.08)。总体而言,移植后30天生存率为71%,支持时间无差异(P = 0.2)。住院死亡率为32%,队列间无差异(P > 0.99)。在存活到移植的患者(n = 22)中,长期策略包括使用耐用心室辅助装置(18%,n = 4),心脏移植(55%,n = 12)和心脏恢复(27%,n = 6)。结论:在fda批准的持续时间之外,可以支持高危心源性休克患者使用Impella 5.5,而不会增加并发症或死亡率的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery is the first journal whose main mission is to disseminate information specifically about advances in technology and techniques that lead to less invasive treatment of cardiothoracic and vascular disease. It delivers cutting edge original research, reviews, essays, case reports, and editorials from the pioneers and experts in the field of minimally invasive cardiothoracic and vascular disease, including biomedical engineers. Also included are papers presented at the annual ISMICS meeting. Official Journal of the International Society for Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信