The discriminatory diagnostic value of multimodal ultrasound combined with blood cell analysis for granulomatous lobular mastitis and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.

Yan-Hao Zeng, Yu-Ping Yang, Li-Juan Liu, Jun Xie, Hai-Xia Dai, Hong-Lian Zhou, Xing Huang, Rong-Li Huang, Er-Qiu Liu, Yi-Jing Deng, Hua-Juan Li, Jia-Jian Wu, Guo-Li Zhang, Man-Li Liao, Xiao-Hong Xu
{"title":"The discriminatory diagnostic value of multimodal ultrasound combined with blood cell analysis for granulomatous lobular mastitis and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.","authors":"Yan-Hao Zeng, Yu-Ping Yang, Li-Juan Liu, Jun Xie, Hai-Xia Dai, Hong-Lian Zhou, Xing Huang, Rong-Li Huang, Er-Qiu Liu, Yi-Jing Deng, Hua-Juan Li, Jia-Jian Wu, Guo-Li Zhang, Man-Li Liao, Xiao-Hong Xu","doi":"10.3233/CH-231999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the discriminatory diagnostic value of multimodal ultrasound(US) combined with blood cell analysis (BCA) for Granulomatous Lobular Mastitis (GLM) and Invasive Ductal Carcinoma (IDC) of the breast.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 157 breast disease patients were collected and divided into two groups based on postoperative pathological results: the GLM group (57 cases with 57 lesions) and the IDC group (100 cases with 100 lesions). Differences in multimodal ultrasound features and the presence of BCA were compared between the two groups. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to calculate the optimal cutoff values, sensitivity, specificity, 95% confidence interval (CI), and the area under the curve (AUC) for patient age, lesion size, lesion resistive index (RI), and white blood cell (WBC) count in BCA. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, diagnostic accuracy, and AUC were calculated for different diagnostic methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) observed between GLM and IDC patients in terms of age, breast pain, the factors in Conventional US (lesion size, RI, nipple delineation, solitary/multiple lesions, margin, liquefaction area, growth direction, microcalcifications, posterior echogenicity and abnormal axillary lymph nodes), the factors in CEUS (contrast agent enhancement intensity, enhancement pattern, enhancement range, and crab-like enhancement) and the factors in BCA (white blood cells, neutrophils, lymphocytes and monocytes). ROC curve analysis results showed that the optimal cutoff values for distinguishing GLM from IDC were 40.5 years for age, 7.15 cm for lesion size, 0.655 for lesion RI, and 10.525*109/L for white blood cells. The diagnostic accuracy of conventional US combined with CEUS (US-CEUS) was the highest (97.45%). The diagnostic performance AUCs for US-CEUS, CEUS, and US were 0.965, 0.921 and 0.832, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multifactorial analysis of multimodal ultrasound features and BCA had high clinical application value in the differential diagnosis of GLM and IDC.</p>","PeriodicalId":93943,"journal":{"name":"Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/CH-231999","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the discriminatory diagnostic value of multimodal ultrasound(US) combined with blood cell analysis (BCA) for Granulomatous Lobular Mastitis (GLM) and Invasive Ductal Carcinoma (IDC) of the breast.

Methods: A total of 157 breast disease patients were collected and divided into two groups based on postoperative pathological results: the GLM group (57 cases with 57 lesions) and the IDC group (100 cases with 100 lesions). Differences in multimodal ultrasound features and the presence of BCA were compared between the two groups. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to calculate the optimal cutoff values, sensitivity, specificity, 95% confidence interval (CI), and the area under the curve (AUC) for patient age, lesion size, lesion resistive index (RI), and white blood cell (WBC) count in BCA. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, diagnostic accuracy, and AUC were calculated for different diagnostic methods.

Results: There were statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) observed between GLM and IDC patients in terms of age, breast pain, the factors in Conventional US (lesion size, RI, nipple delineation, solitary/multiple lesions, margin, liquefaction area, growth direction, microcalcifications, posterior echogenicity and abnormal axillary lymph nodes), the factors in CEUS (contrast agent enhancement intensity, enhancement pattern, enhancement range, and crab-like enhancement) and the factors in BCA (white blood cells, neutrophils, lymphocytes and monocytes). ROC curve analysis results showed that the optimal cutoff values for distinguishing GLM from IDC were 40.5 years for age, 7.15 cm for lesion size, 0.655 for lesion RI, and 10.525*109/L for white blood cells. The diagnostic accuracy of conventional US combined with CEUS (US-CEUS) was the highest (97.45%). The diagnostic performance AUCs for US-CEUS, CEUS, and US were 0.965, 0.921 and 0.832, respectively.

Conclusion: Multifactorial analysis of multimodal ultrasound features and BCA had high clinical application value in the differential diagnosis of GLM and IDC.

多模态超声联合血细胞分析对肉芽肿性小叶性乳腺炎和乳腺浸润性导管癌的鉴别诊断价值。
目的:探讨多模态超声(US)联合血细胞分析(BCA)对乳腺小叶性肉芽肿性乳腺炎(GLM)和浸润性导管癌(IDC)的鉴别诊断价值。方法:收集157例乳腺疾病患者,根据术后病理结果分为两组:GLM组(57例,病变57个)和IDC组(100例,病变100个)。比较两组多模态超声特征及BCA存在的差异。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线计算患者年龄、病变大小、病变抵抗指数(RI)和BCA白细胞计数的最佳截断值、敏感性、特异性、95%置信区间(CI)和曲线下面积(AUC)。计算不同诊断方法的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、诊断准确率和AUC。结果:GIM与IDC患者在年龄、乳房疼痛、常规超声因素(病变大小、面积、乳头围度、单发/多发病变、边缘、液化面积、生长方向、微钙化、后回声增强、腋窝淋巴结异常)、超声造影因素(造影剂增强强度、增强方式、增强范围、和蟹状增强)和BCA中的因子(白细胞、中性粒细胞、淋巴细胞和单核细胞)。ROC曲线分析结果显示,年龄40.5岁、病变大小7.15 cm、病变RI 0.655、白细胞10.525*109/L是区分GLM和IDC的最佳截断值。常规超声联合超声(US-CEUS)诊断准确率最高(97.45%)。US-CEUS、CEUS、US的诊断效能auc分别为0.965、0.921、0.832。结论:多模态超声特征及BCA的多因素分析对GLM与IDC的鉴别诊断具有较高的临床应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信