Diagnostic methods for dysthyroid optic neuropathy: A systematic review and analysis

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Stella Weng Chi Sio , Benson Kang To Chan , Fatema Mohamed Ali Abdulla Aljufairi , Jake Uy Sebastian , Kenneth Ka Hei Lai , Clement Chee Yung Tham , Chi Pui Pang , Kelvin Kam Lung Chong
{"title":"Diagnostic methods for dysthyroid optic neuropathy: A systematic review and analysis","authors":"Stella Weng Chi Sio ,&nbsp;Benson Kang To Chan ,&nbsp;Fatema Mohamed Ali Abdulla Aljufairi ,&nbsp;Jake Uy Sebastian ,&nbsp;Kenneth Ka Hei Lai ,&nbsp;Clement Chee Yung Tham ,&nbsp;Chi Pui Pang ,&nbsp;Kelvin Kam Lung Chong","doi":"10.1016/j.survophthal.2023.11.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Diagnosis of dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON) typically relies on a set of diagnostic clinical features, including decreased visual acuity<span><span>, impaired color vision, presence of relative afferent pupillary defect, </span>optic disc swelling and ancillary tests including visual field (VF), pattern visual evoked potential (pVEP), and apical crowding or optic nerve stretching on neuroimaging. We summarize various diagnostic methods to establish or rule out DON. A total of 95 studies (involving 4619 DON eyes) met the inclusion criteria. All of the studies considered clinical features as evidence of DON, while most of the studies confirmed DON diagnosis by combining clinical features with ancillary tests. Forty studies (42.1%) used at least 2 out of the 3 tests (VF, pVEP and neuroimaging) and 13 studies (13.7%) used all 3 tests to diagnose DON. In 64 % of the published studies regarding DON, the diagnostic methods of DON were not specified. It is important to note the limitations of relying solely on clinical features for diagnosing DON. On the other hand, since some eyes with optic neuropathy can be normal in one ancillary test, but abnormal in another, using more than one ancillary test to aid diagnosis is crucial and should be interpreted in correlation with clinical features. We found that the diagnostic methods of DON in most studies involved using a combination of specific clinical features and at least 2 ancillary tests.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":22102,"journal":{"name":"Survey of ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039625723001613","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diagnosis of dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON) typically relies on a set of diagnostic clinical features, including decreased visual acuity, impaired color vision, presence of relative afferent pupillary defect, optic disc swelling and ancillary tests including visual field (VF), pattern visual evoked potential (pVEP), and apical crowding or optic nerve stretching on neuroimaging. We summarize various diagnostic methods to establish or rule out DON. A total of 95 studies (involving 4619 DON eyes) met the inclusion criteria. All of the studies considered clinical features as evidence of DON, while most of the studies confirmed DON diagnosis by combining clinical features with ancillary tests. Forty studies (42.1%) used at least 2 out of the 3 tests (VF, pVEP and neuroimaging) and 13 studies (13.7%) used all 3 tests to diagnose DON. In 64 % of the published studies regarding DON, the diagnostic methods of DON were not specified. It is important to note the limitations of relying solely on clinical features for diagnosing DON. On the other hand, since some eyes with optic neuropathy can be normal in one ancillary test, but abnormal in another, using more than one ancillary test to aid diagnosis is crucial and should be interpreted in correlation with clinical features. We found that the diagnostic methods of DON in most studies involved using a combination of specific clinical features and at least 2 ancillary tests.

甲状腺功能障碍视神经病变的诊断方法:系统回顾与分析。
甲状腺功能障碍视神经病变(DON)的诊断通常依赖于一系列诊断性临床特征,包括视力下降、色觉受损、相对传入瞳孔缺损、视盘肿胀和辅助检查,包括视野(VF)、模式视觉诱发电位(pVEP)、神经影像学上的尖端拥挤或视神经拉伸。我们总结了各种诊断方法来建立或排除DON。共有95项研究(涉及4619只DON眼)符合纳入标准。所有的研究都将临床特征作为DON的证据,而大多数研究通过结合临床特征和辅助试验来证实DON的诊断。40项研究(42.1%)至少使用3项检查中的2项(VF、pVEP和神经影像学),13项研究(13.7%)使用所有3项检查诊断DON。在已发表的有关DON的研究中,有64%没有明确DON的诊断方法。重要的是要注意仅仅依靠临床特征来诊断DON的局限性。另一方面,由于一些视神经病变的眼睛在一项辅助检查中可能是正常的,但在另一项辅助检查中可能是异常的,因此使用多种辅助检查来辅助诊断是至关重要的,并且应该与临床特征相关。我们的研究发现,在大多数研究中,DON的诊断方法涉及使用特定临床特征和至少2个辅助试验的组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Survey of ophthalmology
Survey of ophthalmology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
138
审稿时长
14.8 weeks
期刊介绍: Survey of Ophthalmology is a clinically oriented review journal designed to keep ophthalmologists up to date. Comprehensive major review articles, written by experts and stringently refereed, integrate the literature on subjects selected for their clinical importance. Survey also includes feature articles, section reviews, book reviews, and abstracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信