Do Chameleons Lead Better? A Meta-Analysis of the Self-Monitoring and Leadership Relationship.

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Linghe Lei, Chen Wang, Jonathan Pinto
{"title":"Do Chameleons Lead Better? A Meta-Analysis of the Self-Monitoring and Leadership Relationship.","authors":"Linghe Lei, Chen Wang, Jonathan Pinto","doi":"10.1177/01461672231210778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The relationship between self-monitoring and leadership has been debated. We attempt to resolve this debate through a meta-analysis (<i>N</i> = 9,029 across 55 samples). Since this is the first meta-analysis that focuses on this relationship, we were able to study both focal constructs at a granular level. As hypothesized, self-monitoring is positively associated with <i>leadership emergence</i> and <i>leadership effectiveness</i>. Whereas self-monitoring is positively related to <i>managerial leadership</i>, its relationship with <i>transactional leadership</i> is non-significant. Contrary to our prediction that self-monitoring is negatively related to <i>authentic leadership</i> and to <i>transformational leadership</i>, we found positive relationships. Importantly, the relationship between self-monitoring and leadership variables is typically non-significant when the latter is measured by subordinate ratings. This casts doubt on the general finding that self-monitoring is positively related to leadership. Also, the relationships significantly differ when self-monitoring was measured by different scales. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19834,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"1139-1158"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12130612/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231210778","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relationship between self-monitoring and leadership has been debated. We attempt to resolve this debate through a meta-analysis (N = 9,029 across 55 samples). Since this is the first meta-analysis that focuses on this relationship, we were able to study both focal constructs at a granular level. As hypothesized, self-monitoring is positively associated with leadership emergence and leadership effectiveness. Whereas self-monitoring is positively related to managerial leadership, its relationship with transactional leadership is non-significant. Contrary to our prediction that self-monitoring is negatively related to authentic leadership and to transformational leadership, we found positive relationships. Importantly, the relationship between self-monitoring and leadership variables is typically non-significant when the latter is measured by subordinate ratings. This casts doubt on the general finding that self-monitoring is positively related to leadership. Also, the relationships significantly differ when self-monitoring was measured by different scales. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

变色龙的领导能力更好吗?自我监控与领导关系的元分析。
自我监督和领导力之间的关系一直存在争议。我们试图通过荟萃分析(55个样本的N = 9029)来解决这一争论。由于这是第一个关注这种关系的元分析,我们能够在颗粒级别上研究这两个焦点结构。假设自我监控与领导力涌现和领导力有效性呈正相关。自我监控与管理型领导有显著正相关,与交易型领导关系不显著。与我们的预测相反,自我监控与真实领导和变革领导呈负相关,我们发现了正相关关系。重要的是,当用下属评价来衡量领导力时,自我监控与领导力变量之间的关系通常是不显著的。这让人们对自我监控与领导力正相关的普遍发现产生了怀疑。此外,当采用不同的量表测量自我监控时,这种关系也有显著差异。讨论了理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: The Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin is the official journal for the Society of Personality and Social Psychology. The journal is an international outlet for original empirical papers in all areas of personality and social psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信