Methods and outcomes of teaching functional anatomy of the musculoskeletal system: A scoping review

Q3 Medicine
D. Chytas , M. Piagkou , G. Tsakotos , V. Protogerou , T. Demesticha , K. Natsis
{"title":"Methods and outcomes of teaching functional anatomy of the musculoskeletal system: A scoping review","authors":"D. Chytas ,&nbsp;M. Piagkou ,&nbsp;G. Tsakotos ,&nbsp;V. Protogerou ,&nbsp;T. Demesticha ,&nbsp;K. Natsis","doi":"10.1016/j.morpho.2023.100729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Although musculoskeletal anatomy is inherently related to motion, there is a lack of evidence review about the best teaching practices for the locomotor apparatus functional anatomy. We aimed to detect the strategies that have been implemented for functional musculoskeletal anatomy education, and their outcomes, with the ultimate purpose of suggesting the most effective teaching methods.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>The databases PubMed, Scopus, ERIC, and </span>Cochrane Library were searched for papers with the purpose of exploring the outcomes (participants’ perceptions and/or examination performance) of teaching functional musculoskeletal anatomy. From each study, the following information was extracted: author(s), number of participants, implementation method, participants’ perceptions and/or examination performance after the educational intervention, and classification of the outcomes according to the Kirkpatrick hierarchy.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seven papers were included. Six of them involved active learning strategies (other than seeing, listening, and taking notes). Several specific teaching methods were implemented, including physical activities, lectures, textbooks, atlases, prosected specimens, near-peer teaching, and digital and physical models. Overall, methods that involved active learning, especially some form of physical activity, had the best educational outcomes, while passive learning was not found to be significantly more effective in any case. The role of modern anatomy education technologies has been inadequately explored.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>It appears that teaching functional musculoskeletal anatomy is more successful when using active learning methods, especially involving some form of physical activity. More research is necessary to determine the best environment for these methods and investigate the role of modern technologies in functional musculoskeletal anatomy education.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39316,"journal":{"name":"Morphologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Morphologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1286011523002114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Although musculoskeletal anatomy is inherently related to motion, there is a lack of evidence review about the best teaching practices for the locomotor apparatus functional anatomy. We aimed to detect the strategies that have been implemented for functional musculoskeletal anatomy education, and their outcomes, with the ultimate purpose of suggesting the most effective teaching methods.

Methods

The databases PubMed, Scopus, ERIC, and Cochrane Library were searched for papers with the purpose of exploring the outcomes (participants’ perceptions and/or examination performance) of teaching functional musculoskeletal anatomy. From each study, the following information was extracted: author(s), number of participants, implementation method, participants’ perceptions and/or examination performance after the educational intervention, and classification of the outcomes according to the Kirkpatrick hierarchy.

Results

Seven papers were included. Six of them involved active learning strategies (other than seeing, listening, and taking notes). Several specific teaching methods were implemented, including physical activities, lectures, textbooks, atlases, prosected specimens, near-peer teaching, and digital and physical models. Overall, methods that involved active learning, especially some form of physical activity, had the best educational outcomes, while passive learning was not found to be significantly more effective in any case. The role of modern anatomy education technologies has been inadequately explored.

Conclusions

It appears that teaching functional musculoskeletal anatomy is more successful when using active learning methods, especially involving some form of physical activity. More research is necessary to determine the best environment for these methods and investigate the role of modern technologies in functional musculoskeletal anatomy education.

肌肉骨骼系统功能解剖学教学的方法与结果:综述
目的:尽管肌肉骨骼解剖学与运动有内在的联系,但缺乏关于运动器官功能解剖学最佳教学实践的证据综述。我们的目的是检测功能肌肉骨骼解剖学教学的实施策略及其效果,最终目的是建议最有效的教学方法。方法检索PubMed、Scopus、ERIC、Cochrane Library等数据库,探讨功能性肌肉骨骼解剖学教学的结果(参与者的认知和/或考试表现)。从每项研究中提取以下信息:作者、参与者人数、实施方法、参与者在教育干预后的认知和/或考试成绩,以及根据Kirkpatrick层次结构对结果的分类。结果共纳入7篇论文。其中六个涉及主动学习策略(除了看、听和记笔记)。实施了几种具体的教学方法,包括体育活动、讲座、教科书、地图集、标本、近同伴教学、数字和物理模型。总体而言,涉及主动学习的方法,特别是某种形式的体育活动,具有最好的教育效果,而被动学习在任何情况下都没有发现明显更有效。现代解剖学教育技术的作用尚未得到充分的探索。结论采用主动学习方法,特别是涉及某种形式的身体活动,在功能性肌肉骨骼解剖学教学中取得了更大的成功。需要更多的研究来确定这些方法的最佳环境,并调查现代技术在功能肌肉骨骼解剖学教育中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Morphologie
Morphologie Medicine-Anatomy
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
150
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Morphologie est une revue universitaire avec une ouverture médicale qui sa adresse aux enseignants, aux étudiants, aux chercheurs et aux cliniciens en anatomie et en morphologie. Vous y trouverez les développements les plus actuels de votre spécialité, en France comme a international. Le objectif de Morphologie est d?offrir des lectures privilégiées sous forme de revues générales, d?articles originaux, de mises au point didactiques et de revues de la littérature, qui permettront notamment aux enseignants de optimiser leurs cours et aux spécialistes d?enrichir leurs connaissances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信