Evaluating the axonal injury and predicting the motor function recovery in supratentorial acute stroke patients

IF 0.4 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Anh Tuan Tran , Van Tuan Nguyen , Quang Huy Huynh , Dinh Minh Nguyen , Huy Manh Bui , Hai Dang Vu , Tuan Vu Nguyen , Thu Ha Nguyen-Thi
{"title":"Evaluating the axonal injury and predicting the motor function recovery in supratentorial acute stroke patients","authors":"Anh Tuan Tran ,&nbsp;Van Tuan Nguyen ,&nbsp;Quang Huy Huynh ,&nbsp;Dinh Minh Nguyen ,&nbsp;Huy Manh Bui ,&nbsp;Hai Dang Vu ,&nbsp;Tuan Vu Nguyen ,&nbsp;Thu Ha Nguyen-Thi","doi":"10.1016/j.inat.2023.101919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study aims to evaluate axonal injury in supratentorial acute stroke patients and predict motor function recovery.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional descriptive study was performed on 28 patients with supratentorial acute stroke. All patients underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at Bach Mai Hospital from September 2021 to August 2022. Diffuse tensor imaging (DTI) was conducted using a 3-Tesla MRI machine to evaluate the association between the corticospinal tract and infarct area. Therefore, axonal injury and motor function recovery levels could be predicted.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Almost patients had no change in the signal of the axons, which did not pass through the infarct lesion (28.6%), and the signals strongly decreased in patients whose axons completely stayed inside the infarct lesion (32.1%). The fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) indices of the axons on the infarcted side were lower than those of axons on the contralateral side. The patient group, in which the axons did not pass through the infarct lesion or had no change in axonal signals, had a higher rate of better motor function recovery after 3 months than the other groups (39.3% and 25 %, respectively), whereas the axon group, in which the axons stayed completely inside the infarct lesion or had a remarkably decreased signal, had a very poor rate of recovery (32.1% and 39.3 %, respectively). The FA index of the axons on the infarct side in the poor recovery group was lower than that in the good recovery group. The ADC index did not differ between the groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>MRI finding with axonal signal, location, and infarct side could significantly predict motor recovery after 3 months in acute stroke patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38138,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case Management","volume":"36 ","pages":"Article 101919"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214751923002025/pdfft?md5=fae10f6ec46adb9582ceff8bd90f3358&pid=1-s2.0-S2214751923002025-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214751923002025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to evaluate axonal injury in supratentorial acute stroke patients and predict motor function recovery.

Methods

A cross-sectional descriptive study was performed on 28 patients with supratentorial acute stroke. All patients underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at Bach Mai Hospital from September 2021 to August 2022. Diffuse tensor imaging (DTI) was conducted using a 3-Tesla MRI machine to evaluate the association between the corticospinal tract and infarct area. Therefore, axonal injury and motor function recovery levels could be predicted.

Results

Almost patients had no change in the signal of the axons, which did not pass through the infarct lesion (28.6%), and the signals strongly decreased in patients whose axons completely stayed inside the infarct lesion (32.1%). The fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) indices of the axons on the infarcted side were lower than those of axons on the contralateral side. The patient group, in which the axons did not pass through the infarct lesion or had no change in axonal signals, had a higher rate of better motor function recovery after 3 months than the other groups (39.3% and 25 %, respectively), whereas the axon group, in which the axons stayed completely inside the infarct lesion or had a remarkably decreased signal, had a very poor rate of recovery (32.1% and 39.3 %, respectively). The FA index of the axons on the infarct side in the poor recovery group was lower than that in the good recovery group. The ADC index did not differ between the groups.

Conclusion

MRI finding with axonal signal, location, and infarct side could significantly predict motor recovery after 3 months in acute stroke patients.

幕上急性脑卒中患者轴索损伤评价及运动功能恢复预测
目的评价幕上急性脑卒中患者的轴索损伤,预测其运动功能的恢复。方法对28例幕上急性脑卒中患者进行横断面描述性研究。所有患者于2021年9月至2022年8月在巴赫迈医院接受了脑磁共振成像(MRI)。采用3特斯拉磁共振成像仪进行弥散张量成像(DTI)评估皮质脊髓束与梗死面积的关系。因此,可以预测轴突损伤和运动功能恢复水平。结果绝大多数患者轴突信号没有改变,未穿过梗死灶(28.6%),而轴突完全停留在梗死灶内的患者信号明显下降(32.1%)。梗死侧轴突分数各向异性(FA)和表观扩散系数(ADC)指数均低于对侧轴突。3个月后,轴突未穿过梗死灶或轴突信号未发生变化的患者组运动功能恢复率高于其他组(分别为39.3%和25%),而轴突完全停留在梗死灶内或信号明显减弱的轴突组运动功能恢复率极低(分别为32.1%和39.3%)。恢复差组梗死侧轴突FA指数低于恢复好组。两组间ADC指数无显著差异。结论轴突信号、梗死部位和梗死侧的mri表现对急性脑卒中患者3个月后的运动恢复有显著预测作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
236
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信