Measuring arm impairment and disability after stroke.

D T Wade
{"title":"Measuring arm impairment and disability after stroke.","authors":"D T Wade","doi":"10.3109/03790798909166398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This is a review of the problems of assessing impairments and disabilities affecting the arm after stroke, and of the various published measures already available. In routine clinical practice, motor impairment is best assessed using grip strength or the Motricity Index, and dexterity disability is best assessed using the Nine-Hole Peg Test or Ten-Hole Peg Test. No measures of sensation and tone are specifically recommended, primarily because validity and reliability has not been well established for the measures available. Other more complex tests appropriate for more detailed use in planning treatment or in research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":77547,"journal":{"name":"International disability studies","volume":"11 2","pages":"89-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/03790798909166398","citationCount":"128","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International disability studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/03790798909166398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 128

Abstract

This is a review of the problems of assessing impairments and disabilities affecting the arm after stroke, and of the various published measures already available. In routine clinical practice, motor impairment is best assessed using grip strength or the Motricity Index, and dexterity disability is best assessed using the Nine-Hole Peg Test or Ten-Hole Peg Test. No measures of sensation and tone are specifically recommended, primarily because validity and reliability has not been well established for the measures available. Other more complex tests appropriate for more detailed use in planning treatment or in research are discussed.

测量中风后手臂损伤和残疾。
这是评估中风后影响手臂的损伤和残疾的问题,以及各种已发表的测量方法的回顾。在常规临床实践中,运动障碍的最佳评估方法是握力或运动指数,而灵巧性障碍的最佳评估方法是九孔钉试验或十孔钉试验。没有特别推荐感觉和音调的测量方法,主要是因为有效性和可靠性尚未很好地建立可用的测量方法。讨论了适合在计划治疗或研究中更详细使用的其他更复杂的测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信