Comparing trial-and-error to errorless learning procedures in training pet dogs a visual discrimination

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL
Kimberley Handley , Susan Hazel , Jade Fountain , Eduardo J. Fernandez
{"title":"Comparing trial-and-error to errorless learning procedures in training pet dogs a visual discrimination","authors":"Kimberley Handley ,&nbsp;Susan Hazel ,&nbsp;Jade Fountain ,&nbsp;Eduardo J. Fernandez","doi":"10.1016/j.lmot.2023.101944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Errorless learning is a stimulus fading procedure that can reduce incorrect responses in a stimulus discrimination task. Errorless learning has been described as a beneficial dog training procedure, although minimal research has been performed with dogs to support its use. The current study compared the effects of using an errorless learning to a trial-and-error learning procedure to train a stimulus discrimination in companion dogs. Eight dogs were trained, four in each group, with concurrent stimuli and either through gradually fading in an incorrect stimulus (errorless learning group) or by differentially reinforcing correct and incorrect responses (trial and error group). Correct responses, incorrect responses, frustration-related responses, and non-responses were measured and compared across the two groups. The results showed the errorless learning dogs were more likely to meet the criteria for learning the discrimination, showed faster speeds of acquisition, and displayed fewer frustration-related behaviours compared to the trial-and-error group. These results are discussed in relation to their benefits for training dogs more effectively and with better welfare during training, suggesting errorless learning could be more greatly utilized for canine training and research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47305,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Motivation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023969023000759/pdfft?md5=b297ea8c80fc839b440333bfb39efd4d&pid=1-s2.0-S0023969023000759-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Motivation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023969023000759","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Errorless learning is a stimulus fading procedure that can reduce incorrect responses in a stimulus discrimination task. Errorless learning has been described as a beneficial dog training procedure, although minimal research has been performed with dogs to support its use. The current study compared the effects of using an errorless learning to a trial-and-error learning procedure to train a stimulus discrimination in companion dogs. Eight dogs were trained, four in each group, with concurrent stimuli and either through gradually fading in an incorrect stimulus (errorless learning group) or by differentially reinforcing correct and incorrect responses (trial and error group). Correct responses, incorrect responses, frustration-related responses, and non-responses were measured and compared across the two groups. The results showed the errorless learning dogs were more likely to meet the criteria for learning the discrimination, showed faster speeds of acquisition, and displayed fewer frustration-related behaviours compared to the trial-and-error group. These results are discussed in relation to their benefits for training dogs more effectively and with better welfare during training, suggesting errorless learning could be more greatly utilized for canine training and research.

试错与无错学习方法在训练宠物犬视觉辨别中的比较
无差错学习是一种刺激消退过程,可以减少刺激辨别任务中的错误反应。无误学习被认为是一种有益的狗训练方法,尽管对狗进行的研究很少支持它的使用。目前的研究比较了使用无错误学习和试错学习程序来训练同伴狗的刺激辨别能力的效果。8只狗接受训练,每组4只,同时接受刺激,要么在错误的刺激中逐渐消失(无错误学习组),要么通过不同的方式加强正确和错误的反应(试错组)。对两组的正确反应、错误反应、与挫折有关的反应和无反应进行测量和比较。结果显示,与试错组相比,无错误学习组的狗更有可能满足学习辨别的标准,表现出更快的习得速度,并表现出更少的沮丧相关行为。这些结果讨论了它们对更有效地训练狗和在训练中获得更好的福利的好处,建议将无差错学习更大程度地用于犬类的训练和研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Learning and Motivation features original experimental research devoted to the analysis of basic phenomena and mechanisms of learning, memory, and motivation. These studies, involving either animal or human subjects, examine behavioral, biological, and evolutionary influences on the learning and motivation processes, and often report on an integrated series of experiments that advance knowledge in this field. Theoretical papers and shorter reports are also considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信