Ascertaining the manner of death: Distinguishing killing from carcass scavenging

Maite Arilla , Jordi Rosell , Ivan Afonso Jordana , Ruth Blasco
{"title":"Ascertaining the manner of death: Distinguishing killing from carcass scavenging","authors":"Maite Arilla ,&nbsp;Jordi Rosell ,&nbsp;Ivan Afonso Jordana ,&nbsp;Ruth Blasco","doi":"10.1016/j.fsiae.2023.100076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study presents a documented case of a bear (<em>Ursus arctos</em>) predator attack on a foal, employing osteological analysis to determine the manner of death. By analyzing bone surface and structural modifications, we distinguish between injuries inflicted during the killing event and those resulting from scavenging or post-mortem consumption. A variety of bone modifications are recorded and documented, with a particular emphasis on a linear fracture on the body of the C4 vertebra and a double arc puncture on the proximal metaphysis of the left metatarsal. The former wound signifies a direct attack, while the latter signifies a defensive injury. This study case underscores the importance of taphonomic analysis in detecting instances of wild animal attacks on domestic livestock. Particularly in scenarios where visual evidence and conventional necropsies concentrating on soft tissue examination fail to confirm mauling occurrences, taphonomy provides valuable insights.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93435,"journal":{"name":"Forensic science international. Animals and environments","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100076"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666937423000148/pdfft?md5=64fadd5a342afafb5b21aa39467afb61&pid=1-s2.0-S2666937423000148-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic science international. Animals and environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666937423000148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a documented case of a bear (Ursus arctos) predator attack on a foal, employing osteological analysis to determine the manner of death. By analyzing bone surface and structural modifications, we distinguish between injuries inflicted during the killing event and those resulting from scavenging or post-mortem consumption. A variety of bone modifications are recorded and documented, with a particular emphasis on a linear fracture on the body of the C4 vertebra and a double arc puncture on the proximal metaphysis of the left metatarsal. The former wound signifies a direct attack, while the latter signifies a defensive injury. This study case underscores the importance of taphonomic analysis in detecting instances of wild animal attacks on domestic livestock. Particularly in scenarios where visual evidence and conventional necropsies concentrating on soft tissue examination fail to confirm mauling occurrences, taphonomy provides valuable insights.

确定死亡方式:区分杀戮与腐尸
本研究提出了一个记录在案的熊(熊)捕食者袭击小马驹的案例,采用骨学分析来确定死亡方式。通过分析骨头表面和结构变化,我们区分了在杀戮事件中造成的伤害和由食腐或死后消耗造成的伤害。记录和记录了各种骨修饰,特别强调C4椎体的线状骨折和左跖骨近端干骺端的双弧穿刺。前一种伤口表明是直接攻击,而后一种伤口表明是防御性伤害。这一研究案例强调了地语学分析在发现野生动物袭击家畜事件中的重要性。特别是在视觉证据和常规尸检集中在软组织检查不能证实损伤发生的情况下,埋藏术提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forensic science international. Animals and environments
Forensic science international. Animals and environments Pollution, Law, Forensic Medicine, Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine (General)
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
142 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信