Criteria-based return to sport testing after open Latarjet reveals residual deficits and can be utilized for sports clearance with excellent outcomes at mean 3.6 year follow-up: A small case series of competitive athletes

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Rajiv P. Reddy, Matthew Como, Shaquille Charles, Zachary J. Herman, Ehab M. Nazzal, Christopher J. Como, Anya Singh-Varma, Alex Fails, Adam Popchak, Albert Lin
{"title":"Criteria-based return to sport testing after open Latarjet reveals residual deficits and can be utilized for sports clearance with excellent outcomes at mean 3.6 year follow-up: A small case series of competitive athletes","authors":"Rajiv P. Reddy,&nbsp;Matthew Como,&nbsp;Shaquille Charles,&nbsp;Zachary J. Herman,&nbsp;Ehab M. Nazzal,&nbsp;Christopher J. Como,&nbsp;Anya Singh-Varma,&nbsp;Alex Fails,&nbsp;Adam Popchak,&nbsp;Albert Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.ptsp.2023.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to assess the use of a criteria-based return to sport (CBRTS) test to evaluate readiness for return to play (RTP) in competitive athletes that underwent open Latarjet.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Retrospective case series.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Ten competitive athletes (mean age 19.9 years) treated with open Latarjet for recurrent glenohumeral instability underwent CBRTS testing at a mean of 5.3 months postoperatively. Testing consisted of four components: 1. isometric strength, 2. isokinetic strength, 3. endurance, and 4. function. Patients failing 0 or 1 component of the test were cleared to RTP. Patients failing multiple components underwent additional deficit-based rehabilitation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 10 patients that tested, 4 passed their overall CBRTS test and were cleared to RTP. The remaining 6 patients failed the overall CBRTS test. Seven patients (70%) failed at least one section of the strength testing, two patients (20%) failed endurance testing, and two patients (20%) failed functional testing. At final follow-up (mean 3.6 years), 1 patient had recurrent instability (10%) and 9 patients returned to play (90%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>CBRTS testing may be clinically useful for return to play clearance decisions after open Latarjet procedure, as it can reveal deficits that may not be identified with time-based clearance alone.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49698,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy in Sport","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy in Sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X23001414","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to assess the use of a criteria-based return to sport (CBRTS) test to evaluate readiness for return to play (RTP) in competitive athletes that underwent open Latarjet.

Design

Retrospective case series.

Methods

Ten competitive athletes (mean age 19.9 years) treated with open Latarjet for recurrent glenohumeral instability underwent CBRTS testing at a mean of 5.3 months postoperatively. Testing consisted of four components: 1. isometric strength, 2. isokinetic strength, 3. endurance, and 4. function. Patients failing 0 or 1 component of the test were cleared to RTP. Patients failing multiple components underwent additional deficit-based rehabilitation.

Results

Of the 10 patients that tested, 4 passed their overall CBRTS test and were cleared to RTP. The remaining 6 patients failed the overall CBRTS test. Seven patients (70%) failed at least one section of the strength testing, two patients (20%) failed endurance testing, and two patients (20%) failed functional testing. At final follow-up (mean 3.6 years), 1 patient had recurrent instability (10%) and 9 patients returned to play (90%).

Conclusions

CBRTS testing may be clinically useful for return to play clearance decisions after open Latarjet procedure, as it can reveal deficits that may not be identified with time-based clearance alone.

在打开Latarjet后,基于标准的恢复运动测试显示剩余缺陷,可用于运动清除,平均3.6年随访结果良好:竞技运动员的小病例系列。
目的:本研究的目的是评估使用基于标准的恢复运动(CBRTS)测试来评估接受开放Latarjet的竞技运动员恢复比赛(RTP)的准备情况。设计:回顾性病例系列。方法:10名竞技运动员(平均年龄19.9岁)接受开放性Latarjet治疗复发性肩关节不稳定,术后平均5.3个月进行CBRTS测试。测试包括四个部分:1。2.等长强度;等速强度;4.耐力;函数。未通过0项或1项测试的患者可进入RTP。多个组件失败的患者接受额外的基于缺陷的康复。结果:在接受测试的10名患者中,4名通过了他们的总体CBRTS测试,并被清除为RTP。其余6例患者未能通过总体CBRTS测试。7例(70%)患者至少有一节强度测试不及格,2例(20%)患者耐力测试不及格,2例(20%)患者功能测试不及格。在最终随访(平均3.6年)时,1例患者复发性不稳定(10%),9例患者恢复比赛(90%)。结论:CBRTS测试可能在临床上对开放性Latarjet手术后的恢复清除决策有用,因为它可以揭示单独基于时间的清除可能无法识别的缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physical Therapy in Sport
Physical Therapy in Sport 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
125
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy in Sport is an international peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for the publication of research and clinical practice material relevant to the healthcare professions involved in sports and exercise medicine, and rehabilitation. The journal publishes material that is indispensable for day-to-day practice and continuing professional development. Physical Therapy in Sport covers topics dealing with the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of injuries, as well as more general areas of sports and exercise medicine and related sports science. The journal publishes original research, case studies, reviews, masterclasses, papers on clinical approaches, and book reviews, as well as occasional reports from conferences. Papers are double-blind peer-reviewed by our international advisory board and other international experts, and submissions from a broad range of disciplines are actively encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信