{"title":"[Scientific integrity faces plagiarism fabricated with the ChatGPT].","authors":"Horacio Rivera","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Among the malpractices that undermine research integrity, plagiarism is a major threat given its frequency and evolving presentations. Plagiarism implies the intentional grabbing of texts, ideas, images, or data belonging to others and without crediting them. However, the different and even masked forms of plagiarism often difficult a clear identification. Currently, the many kinds of fraud and plagiarism account for most retractions in traditional and open access journals. Further, the rate of retracted articles is higher in the Latin American databases LILACS and Scielo than in PubMed and Web of Science. This difference has been related to the typical laxity of our culture and the lack of English writing skills of non-Anglophone researchers. These features explain the conflict experienced by Latin American students in USA where they face a stricter culture regarding academic and scientific plagiarism. In the internet era, the ease of accessing scientific literature has increased the temptation to plagiarize but this ethical breach has been countered by antiplagiarism software. Now, the so-called \"paraphragiarism\" prompted by paraphrasing tools exceeds the infamous \"copy-paste\". For instance, the innovative ChatGPT can be used for plagiarizing and paraphragiarizing. Moreover, its inclusion as coauthor in scientific papers has been banned by prestigious journals and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors because such chatbot cannot meet the required public responsibility criterium. To avoid plagiarism, it is enough to always give due credit in the proper way. Lastly, I question the ill-fated and now prevailing conjunction of blind faith in progress and zero skepticism that prevents us from foreseeing the negative consequences of technological advances.</p>","PeriodicalId":94200,"journal":{"name":"Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10723832/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Among the malpractices that undermine research integrity, plagiarism is a major threat given its frequency and evolving presentations. Plagiarism implies the intentional grabbing of texts, ideas, images, or data belonging to others and without crediting them. However, the different and even masked forms of plagiarism often difficult a clear identification. Currently, the many kinds of fraud and plagiarism account for most retractions in traditional and open access journals. Further, the rate of retracted articles is higher in the Latin American databases LILACS and Scielo than in PubMed and Web of Science. This difference has been related to the typical laxity of our culture and the lack of English writing skills of non-Anglophone researchers. These features explain the conflict experienced by Latin American students in USA where they face a stricter culture regarding academic and scientific plagiarism. In the internet era, the ease of accessing scientific literature has increased the temptation to plagiarize but this ethical breach has been countered by antiplagiarism software. Now, the so-called "paraphragiarism" prompted by paraphrasing tools exceeds the infamous "copy-paste". For instance, the innovative ChatGPT can be used for plagiarizing and paraphragiarizing. Moreover, its inclusion as coauthor in scientific papers has been banned by prestigious journals and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors because such chatbot cannot meet the required public responsibility criterium. To avoid plagiarism, it is enough to always give due credit in the proper way. Lastly, I question the ill-fated and now prevailing conjunction of blind faith in progress and zero skepticism that prevents us from foreseeing the negative consequences of technological advances.
在破坏研究诚信的不当行为中,剽窃是一个主要的威胁,因为它的频率和不断发展的表现。抄袭意味着故意抓取属于他人的文本、想法、图像或数据,而不注明出处。然而,不同的,甚至掩盖形式的抄袭往往难以明确的识别。目前,在传统和开放获取期刊中,各种各样的欺诈和抄袭是导致撤稿的主要原因。此外,拉丁美洲数据库LILACS和Scielo的撤稿率高于PubMed和Web of Science。这种差异与我们典型的宽松文化和非英语国家研究人员缺乏英语写作技巧有关。这些特点解释了拉丁美洲学生在美国经历的冲突,他们面临着更严格的学术和科学剽窃文化。在互联网时代,获取科学文献的便利性增加了剽窃的诱惑,但这种违反道德的行为已经被反剽窃软件所抵消。如今,由释义工具引发的所谓“释义癖”已经超越了臭名昭著的“复制粘贴”。例如,创新的ChatGPT可以用于剽窃和释义。此外,它作为科学论文的共同作者被著名期刊和国际医学期刊编辑委员会禁止,因为这样的聊天机器人不能满足所需的公共责任标准。为了避免抄袭,总是以适当的方式给予应有的荣誉就足够了。最后,我对现在流行的盲目相信进步和零怀疑的不幸结合提出质疑,这种结合使我们无法预见技术进步的负面后果。