Daniel Martínez-Barro, Joel Dair Rivera-Bello, Jannet Mercedes Cruz-López, Hermelinda Hernández-Amaro, David Rojano-Mejía
{"title":"[Functionality/isokinetic work of quadriceps in patients with gonarthrosis managed with prolotherapy].","authors":"Daniel Martínez-Barro, Joel Dair Rivera-Bello, Jannet Mercedes Cruz-López, Hermelinda Hernández-Amaro, David Rojano-Mejía","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.10064325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prolotherapy may be a good option in the complementary treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients, specifically for the increase of functionality.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the effectiveness of prolotherapy in OA grade II - III in the functionality and muscular work of knee flexors and extensors.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted. It included patients diagnosed with OA grades II-III. The experimental group was infiltrated in both knees with 6 ml of 25% glucose solution and 0.05% lidocaine; control group with 0.45% saline solution and 0.05% lidocaine. All patients received a comprehensive rehabilitation program. The isokinetic work of the knee flexor and extensor muscles, pain and functionality were measured, prior to infiltration and at 3-month follow-up. To compare the difference in means, the Student's T test was applied, considering P<0.05 as significant. The project was approved by the local ethics and research committee.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>37 patients were recruited, 17 in the prolotherapy group. There were no intergroup differences in functionality, isokinetic knee flexor/extensor work, and pain at baseline, or during follow-up up to 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the present study we identify that both prolotherapy and saline infiltration increased functionality, strength, and decreased pain; however, no statistically significant difference was found between the two group.</p>","PeriodicalId":94200,"journal":{"name":"Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10715815/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10064325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Prolotherapy may be a good option in the complementary treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients, specifically for the increase of functionality.
Objective: To determine the effectiveness of prolotherapy in OA grade II - III in the functionality and muscular work of knee flexors and extensors.
Material and methods: a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted. It included patients diagnosed with OA grades II-III. The experimental group was infiltrated in both knees with 6 ml of 25% glucose solution and 0.05% lidocaine; control group with 0.45% saline solution and 0.05% lidocaine. All patients received a comprehensive rehabilitation program. The isokinetic work of the knee flexor and extensor muscles, pain and functionality were measured, prior to infiltration and at 3-month follow-up. To compare the difference in means, the Student's T test was applied, considering P<0.05 as significant. The project was approved by the local ethics and research committee.
Results: 37 patients were recruited, 17 in the prolotherapy group. There were no intergroup differences in functionality, isokinetic knee flexor/extensor work, and pain at baseline, or during follow-up up to 12 weeks.
Conclusions: In the present study we identify that both prolotherapy and saline infiltration increased functionality, strength, and decreased pain; however, no statistically significant difference was found between the two group.