Estimated Prostate Volume by Semiautomatic Segmentation of MRI Is More Accurately Correlated with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen Weight than the Volume Calculated by Ellipsoid Formula.
Shulin Wu, Adam S Feldman, Sharron X Lin, Michelle M Kim, Kristine M Cornejo, Mukesh G Harisinghani, Chin-Lee Wu, Douglas M Dahl
{"title":"Estimated Prostate Volume by Semiautomatic Segmentation of MRI Is More Accurately Correlated with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen Weight than the Volume Calculated by Ellipsoid Formula.","authors":"Shulin Wu, Adam S Feldman, Sharron X Lin, Michelle M Kim, Kristine M Cornejo, Mukesh G Harisinghani, Chin-Lee Wu, Douglas M Dahl","doi":"10.1159/000534742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Accurate in vivo prostate volume (PV) estimation is important for obtaining prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) and further predicting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-estimated PV compared to both volume and weight of radical prostatectomy (RP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified 310 PCa patients who underwent RP following combined targeted and systematic biopsy in our institution from September 2019 to February 2021. The MRI PV was determined using a semiautomated segmentation algorithm. RP PV was calculated using the prolate ellipsoid formula (length × width × height × π/6). Formula (prostate weight = [actual weight-3.8 g]/1.05 g/mL) was applied, and the resulting volume was used in further analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median PV from MRI, RP, and RP weight were 39 mL, 38 mL, and 44 mL, respectively. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients (ρ) were 0.841 (MRI PV vs. RP weight), 0.758 (RP PV vs. RP weight), and 0.707 (MRI PV vs. RP PV) (all p < 0.001). Decreased correlation between the MRI PV and RP PV was observed in the larger (more than 55 mL) prostate. The PSAD derived from MRI PV showed most efficient to detect csPCa in RP specimen (57.9% vs. 57.6% vs. 45.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MRI PV is correlated better with RP weight than calculated RP PV, especially in larger prostate. The high csPCa detection rate in final pathology suggested that PSAD derived from MRI PV can be confidently used in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":23414,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Internationalis","volume":" ","pages":"35-41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Internationalis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000534742","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate in vivo prostate volume (PV) estimation is important for obtaining prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) and further predicting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-estimated PV compared to both volume and weight of radical prostatectomy (RP).
Methods: We identified 310 PCa patients who underwent RP following combined targeted and systematic biopsy in our institution from September 2019 to February 2021. The MRI PV was determined using a semiautomated segmentation algorithm. RP PV was calculated using the prolate ellipsoid formula (length × width × height × π/6). Formula (prostate weight = [actual weight-3.8 g]/1.05 g/mL) was applied, and the resulting volume was used in further analysis.
Results: The median PV from MRI, RP, and RP weight were 39 mL, 38 mL, and 44 mL, respectively. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients (ρ) were 0.841 (MRI PV vs. RP weight), 0.758 (RP PV vs. RP weight), and 0.707 (MRI PV vs. RP PV) (all p < 0.001). Decreased correlation between the MRI PV and RP PV was observed in the larger (more than 55 mL) prostate. The PSAD derived from MRI PV showed most efficient to detect csPCa in RP specimen (57.9% vs. 57.6% vs. 45.4%).
Conclusion: MRI PV is correlated better with RP weight than calculated RP PV, especially in larger prostate. The high csPCa detection rate in final pathology suggested that PSAD derived from MRI PV can be confidently used in clinical practice.
背景:准确的体内前列腺体积(PV)估算对于获得前列腺特异性抗原密度(PSAD)和进一步预测临床显著性前列腺癌(csPCa)非常重要。我们的目的是评估多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)估计PV与根治性前列腺切除术(RP)的体积和重量的准确性。患者和方法:我们从2019年9月至2021年2月在我们机构确定了310例PCa患者,他们在联合靶向和系统活检后接受了RP。使用半自动分割算法确定MRI PV。计算公式(前列腺重量=(实际重量- 3.8g)/ 1.05 g/ml),所得体积用于进一步分析。RP PV采用长椭球体公式(宽×高×长× π/6)计算。结果:MRI中位PV为39 ml, RP为38 ml, RP重量为44 ml。Spearman等级相关系数(ρ)分别为0.841 (MRI PV vs RP weight)、0.758 (RP PV vs RP weight)和0.707 (MRI PV vs RP PV)(均为p
期刊介绍:
Concise but fully substantiated international reports of clinically oriented research into science and current management of urogenital disorders form the nucleus of original as well as basic research papers. These are supplemented by up-to-date reviews by international experts on the state-of-the-art of key topics of clinical urological practice. Essential topics receiving regular coverage include the introduction of new techniques and instrumentation as well as the evaluation of new functional tests and diagnostic methods. Special attention is given to advances in surgical techniques and clinical oncology. The regular publication of selected case reports represents the great variation in urological disease and illustrates treatment solutions in singular cases.