People in Tight Cultures and Tight Situations Wear Masks More: Evidence From Three Large-Scale Studies in China.

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Liuqing Wei, Alexander Scott English, Thomas Talhelm, Xiaoyuan Li, Xuemin Zhang, Shuang Wang
{"title":"People in Tight Cultures and Tight Situations Wear Masks More: Evidence From Three Large-Scale Studies in China.","authors":"Liuqing Wei, Alexander Scott English, Thomas Talhelm, Xiaoyuan Li, Xuemin Zhang, Shuang Wang","doi":"10.1177/01461672231210451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies have found large differences in masks use during the pandemic. We found evidence that cultural tightness explains mask use differences and this association was more robust in tight situations like subways. In Study 1, we observed 23,551 people's actual mask use in public places around China. People wore masks more in tight situations; however, differences did not extend to outdoor streets and public parks, where norms are looser. We replicated this finding using a data from 15,985 people across China. Finally, in a preregistered study we observed mask use with the removal of COVID-19 restrictions, people still wore masks more in tight situations like subways than in loose situations of parks. These findings suggest that norm tightness has a lasting association with people's health-protective behaviors, especially in tight situations. It provides insight into how different cultures might respond with future pandemics and in what situations people adopt health-protective behaviors.</p>","PeriodicalId":19834,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"1121-1138"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231210451","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies have found large differences in masks use during the pandemic. We found evidence that cultural tightness explains mask use differences and this association was more robust in tight situations like subways. In Study 1, we observed 23,551 people's actual mask use in public places around China. People wore masks more in tight situations; however, differences did not extend to outdoor streets and public parks, where norms are looser. We replicated this finding using a data from 15,985 people across China. Finally, in a preregistered study we observed mask use with the removal of COVID-19 restrictions, people still wore masks more in tight situations like subways than in loose situations of parks. These findings suggest that norm tightness has a lasting association with people's health-protective behaviors, especially in tight situations. It provides insight into how different cultures might respond with future pandemics and in what situations people adopt health-protective behaviors.

在严格的文化和严格的情况下,人们戴口罩更多:来自中国三个大规模研究的证据。
研究发现,疫情期间口罩的使用存在很大差异。我们发现有证据表明,文化的紧密性解释了面具使用的差异,这种联系在地铁等紧张的情况下更为明显。在研究1中,我们观察了中国各地23551人在公共场所实际使用口罩的情况。在紧张的情况下,人们更多地戴口罩;然而,这种差异并未延伸到规范较为宽松的户外街道和公园。我们使用来自中国15985人的数据重复了这一发现。最后,在一项预先登记的研究中,我们观察了在取消COVID-19限制后口罩的使用情况,人们在地铁等紧张的情况下仍然比在公园等宽松的情况下戴口罩更多。这些发现表明,规范严密性与人们的健康保护行为有着持久的联系,尤其是在紧张的情况下。它提供了对不同文化如何应对未来流行病以及人们在何种情况下采取保护健康行为的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: The Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin is the official journal for the Society of Personality and Social Psychology. The journal is an international outlet for original empirical papers in all areas of personality and social psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信