{"title":"Anthropometric measurements and body composition of preterm infants born ≤34 weeks at 12-13 months corrected age as compared to term infants.","authors":"Apoorva Kutar, Padmasani Venkat Ramanan, Kandathil Eapen Elizabeth, A J Hemamalini","doi":"10.1093/tropej/fmad038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Growth in the first year of life depends primarily on nutrition. Currently, the infant feeding practices of term babies are being extrapolated for preterms. While extrapolating, it is not clear if corrected age (CA) or chronological age should be used. In preterm infants, born ≤34 week gestation age, this difference may be more than 6 weeks. We studied the growth parameters and body composition of preterm infants born ≤34 week gestation age as compared to that of term infants at 12-13 months CA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The growth of 99 term infants and 170 preterm infants born ≤34 weeks was evaluated at 12-13 months CA. The anthropometric measurements, body mass index (BMI) and skin fold thickness (SFT) at four sites (biceps, triceps, subscapular and suprailiac) were compared in the two groups. The sum of the SFT was taken as a marker of fat mass.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>At 12-13 months CA, preterm infants had significantly less weight, length and BMI as compared to term babies. The weight and BMI for age Z-scores, weight for length Z-scores and fat mass were also significantly less in preterm babies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The anthropometry measures in preterms (<34 weeks) at 12-13 months CA were significantly lower than that of term infants. In our study population, preterms did not catch up in growth in the first year even when the CA is used for comparison. The causes could be multifactorial and need to be studied further.</p>","PeriodicalId":17521,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tropical Pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tropical Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tropej/fmad038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Growth in the first year of life depends primarily on nutrition. Currently, the infant feeding practices of term babies are being extrapolated for preterms. While extrapolating, it is not clear if corrected age (CA) or chronological age should be used. In preterm infants, born ≤34 week gestation age, this difference may be more than 6 weeks. We studied the growth parameters and body composition of preterm infants born ≤34 week gestation age as compared to that of term infants at 12-13 months CA.
Methods: The growth of 99 term infants and 170 preterm infants born ≤34 weeks was evaluated at 12-13 months CA. The anthropometric measurements, body mass index (BMI) and skin fold thickness (SFT) at four sites (biceps, triceps, subscapular and suprailiac) were compared in the two groups. The sum of the SFT was taken as a marker of fat mass.
Result: At 12-13 months CA, preterm infants had significantly less weight, length and BMI as compared to term babies. The weight and BMI for age Z-scores, weight for length Z-scores and fat mass were also significantly less in preterm babies.
Conclusion: The anthropometry measures in preterms (<34 weeks) at 12-13 months CA were significantly lower than that of term infants. In our study population, preterms did not catch up in growth in the first year even when the CA is used for comparison. The causes could be multifactorial and need to be studied further.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Tropical Pediatrics provides a link between theory and practice in the field. Papers report key results of clinical and community research, and considerations of programme development. More general descriptive pieces are included when they have application to work preceeding elsewhere. The journal also presents review articles, book reviews and, occasionally, short monographs and selections of important papers delivered at relevant conferences.