The effect of a foreign language on cognitive reappraisal during exposure to a phobic stimulus

IF 2.5 1区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Isabel Ortigosa, Irene Jaén, Víctor Costumero, Azucena García-Palacios
{"title":"The effect of a foreign language on cognitive reappraisal during exposure to a phobic stimulus","authors":"Isabel Ortigosa, Irene Jaén, Víctor Costumero, Azucena García-Palacios","doi":"10.1017/s1366728923000810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates whether the cognitive reappraisal strategy is influenced by the participant's language (native/foreign) when confronting a fearful stimulus. Sixty participants with subclinical phobia of cockroaches were exposed to several phobic and neutral pictures while they used cognitive reappraisal in their native language or a foreign one. Electrodermal activity, pupil dilation, and self-reports of affective valence and arousal were collected. Results showed that participants in the foreign context were more effective at using reappraisal to reduce valence self-ratings compared to using no regulation. Also, participants in the foreign context showed greater pupil size when reappraising their emotions, compared to the non-regulation condition. Depending on the language, no differences were found for arousal self-reports or electrodermal activity when using reappraisal. These results suggest that using a foreign language could be advantageous in reducing the negative valence through reappraisal. Psychophysiological results are discussed in light of cognitive effort studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8758,"journal":{"name":"Bilingualism: Language and Cognition","volume":"10 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bilingualism: Language and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728923000810","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates whether the cognitive reappraisal strategy is influenced by the participant's language (native/foreign) when confronting a fearful stimulus. Sixty participants with subclinical phobia of cockroaches were exposed to several phobic and neutral pictures while they used cognitive reappraisal in their native language or a foreign one. Electrodermal activity, pupil dilation, and self-reports of affective valence and arousal were collected. Results showed that participants in the foreign context were more effective at using reappraisal to reduce valence self-ratings compared to using no regulation. Also, participants in the foreign context showed greater pupil size when reappraising their emotions, compared to the non-regulation condition. Depending on the language, no differences were found for arousal self-reports or electrodermal activity when using reappraisal. These results suggest that using a foreign language could be advantageous in reducing the negative valence through reappraisal. Psychophysiological results are discussed in light of cognitive effort studies.

暴露于恐惧刺激时,外语对认知重估的影响
本研究探讨了面对恐惧刺激时,认知重评策略是否受到语言(母语/外语)的影响。60名患有亚临床蟑螂恐惧症的参与者在使用母语或外语进行认知重新评估时,被暴露在几张恐惧和中性的图片中。收集了皮电活动、瞳孔扩张、情感效价和觉醒的自我报告。结果表明,与无规则情境相比,外国情境下的被试使用重评来降低效价自评的效果更好。此外,与非规则条件相比,在外国环境下的参与者在重新评估他们的情绪时显示出更大的瞳孔大小。根据语言的不同,在使用重新评估时,唤醒自我报告或皮肤电活动没有发现差异。这些结果表明,使用外语有助于通过重评来减少负效价。从认知努力研究的角度讨论了心理生理学结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信