Neural effects differ for learning highly iconic versus non-iconic signs in hearing adults

IF 2.5 1区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Emily M. Akers, Katherine J. Midgley, Phillip J. Holcomb, Gabriela Meade, Karen Emmorey
{"title":"Neural effects differ for learning highly iconic versus non-iconic signs in hearing adults","authors":"Emily M. Akers, Katherine J. Midgley, Phillip J. Holcomb, Gabriela Meade, Karen Emmorey","doi":"10.1017/s1366728923000809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Little is known about the neural changes that accompany sign language learning by hearing adults. We used ERPs and a word-sign matching task to assess how learning impacted the N400 priming effect (reduced negativity for translations compared to unrelated trials). English monolinguals (N = 32) learned 100 ASL signs – half highly iconic (meaning was guessable), half non-iconic. In contrast to non-iconic signs, little learning was needed for the highly iconic signs as translation accuracy was similar pre- and post-learning. Prior to learning, an N400 priming effect was observed only for iconic signs. After learning, the size of the priming effect increased for non-iconic signs (replicating word learning studies) but decreased for iconic signs. For deaf ASL signers (N = 20), iconicity did not modulate the size of the N400 priming effect. We conclude that the impact of iconicity on lexico-semantic processing is reduced following learning, as signs are integrated into an emerging visual-manual lexicon.</p>","PeriodicalId":8758,"journal":{"name":"Bilingualism: Language and Cognition","volume":"10 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bilingualism: Language and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728923000809","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Little is known about the neural changes that accompany sign language learning by hearing adults. We used ERPs and a word-sign matching task to assess how learning impacted the N400 priming effect (reduced negativity for translations compared to unrelated trials). English monolinguals (N = 32) learned 100 ASL signs – half highly iconic (meaning was guessable), half non-iconic. In contrast to non-iconic signs, little learning was needed for the highly iconic signs as translation accuracy was similar pre- and post-learning. Prior to learning, an N400 priming effect was observed only for iconic signs. After learning, the size of the priming effect increased for non-iconic signs (replicating word learning studies) but decreased for iconic signs. For deaf ASL signers (N = 20), iconicity did not modulate the size of the N400 priming effect. We conclude that the impact of iconicity on lexico-semantic processing is reduced following learning, as signs are integrated into an emerging visual-manual lexicon.

听力成年人学习高度标志性符号和非标志性符号的神经效应不同
对于听力正常的成年人学习手语所伴随的神经变化,我们知之甚少。我们使用erp和单词符号匹配任务来评估学习如何影响N400启动效应(与不相关的试验相比,减少了翻译的负性)。英语单语者(N = 32)学习了100个美国手语符号——一半是高度标志性的(意思是可以猜测的),一半是非标志性的。与非标志性符号相比,高度标志性符号的翻译准确率在学习前和学习后相似,几乎不需要学习。在学习之前,N400启动效应仅在标志性符号中被观察到。学习后,非标志性符号(复制单词学习研究)的启动效应大小增加,而标志性符号的启动效应大小减少。对于聋人手语(N = 20),象似性不影响N400启动效应的大小。我们的结论是,象似性对词汇语义处理的影响在学习后减少,因为符号被整合到一个新兴的视觉-手动词典中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信