Evaluation of Patients with COVID-19 Followed Up in Intensive Care Units in the Second Year of the Pandemic: A Multicenter Point Prevalence Study.

IF 0.6 0 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Sinem Güngör, Özlem Ediboğlu, Özlem Yazıcıoğlu Moçin, Nalan Adıgüzel, Eylem Tuncay, İnşa Gül Ekiz İşcanlı, Berrin Er, Zuhal Karakurt, Sema Turan, Behiye Deniz Kosovalı, Nevzat Mehmet Mutlu, Duygu Kayar, Şerife Gökbulut Bektaş, Elmas Uysal, Fatih Seğmen, Gürayalp Alp, Deniz Erdem, Nazan Has Selmi, Pınar Güven, Zerrin Özçelik, Merve Ocakcıoğlu, Canan Yazıcı Özgür, Rabia Yılmaz, Deniz Bilgi Özel, Halil Cebeci, Bahar Güler, Canan Cansever, Mehmet Çakırca, Hansa İnceöz, İlker Solmaz, Fatma Özkan Sipahioğlu, Eda Macit Aydın, Hakan Dayanır, Sait Fatih Öner, Umut Karatepe, Serkan Özen, Maruf Boran, Dursun Fırat Ergül, Umut Sabri Kasapoğlu, Leman Acun Delen, Erol Toy, Koray Altun, Tuna Albayrak, Hülya Yanal, Gizem Zaim, Volkan Yarar, Gökhan Kılınç, Mustafa Deniz, Esra Özdemir, Veysel Garani Soylu, Ayşe Yılmaz, Saba Mukaddes Saygılı, Ejder Kamil Öztürk, Begüm Ergan, Selin Eyüpoğlu, Yiğit Şahin, Beyza Yüksel, Azime Bulut, Aykut Sarıtaş, Hicret Yeniay, Mürşide Genç, Feyza Kargın, Osman Özcan, Ebru Karakoç, Ümran Karaca, Didem Sözütek, Sema Sarı, Nimet Şenoğlu, Hakan Aygün, Arzu Ceren Yiğit, Nilgün Kavruk, Çağdaş Alp Uzan, Murat Bıçakcıoğlu, Serkan Solak, Hatice Kutbay Özçelik, Kamuran Uluç, İlker Yıldırım, Makbule Cavidan Arar, İsmail Demirel, Soner Umut Küver, Eylem Sercan Özgür, Kutlay Aydın, Gül Erdal Dönmez, Gülbin Aygencel, Aliye Esmaoğlu, Berrak Sebil Aydın, Murat Emre Tokur, Pervin Korkmaz Ekren, Yusuf Aydemir, Başak Çakır Güney, Ömer Yavuz Erdil, Abdurrahman Tünay, Türkan Bahadır, Serkan Uçkun, Nazan Kocaoğlu, Hüseyin Ulaş Pınar, Nurcan Kutluer Karaca, Hamza Gültekin, Pınar Ayvat, Ayşe Belin Özer, Ahmet Eroğlu, Ufuk Kuyrukluyıldız, Çağdaş Baytar, Hilal Ayoğlu, Serpil Mızrakçı, Hatice Metin, Özgecan Pırıl Zanbak Mutlu, Hakan Yılmaz, Filiz Tüzüner
{"title":"Evaluation of Patients with COVID-19 Followed Up in Intensive Care Units in the Second Year of the Pandemic: A Multicenter Point Prevalence Study.","authors":"Sinem Güngör, Özlem Ediboğlu, Özlem Yazıcıoğlu Moçin, Nalan Adıgüzel, Eylem Tuncay, İnşa Gül Ekiz İşcanlı, Berrin Er, Zuhal Karakurt, Sema Turan, Behiye Deniz Kosovalı, Nevzat Mehmet Mutlu, Duygu Kayar, Şerife Gökbulut Bektaş, Elmas Uysal, Fatih Seğmen, Gürayalp Alp, Deniz Erdem, Nazan Has Selmi, Pınar Güven, Zerrin Özçelik, Merve Ocakcıoğlu, Canan Yazıcı Özgür, Rabia Yılmaz, Deniz Bilgi Özel, Halil Cebeci, Bahar Güler, Canan Cansever, Mehmet Çakırca, Hansa İnceöz, İlker Solmaz, Fatma Özkan Sipahioğlu, Eda Macit Aydın, Hakan Dayanır, Sait Fatih Öner, Umut Karatepe, Serkan Özen, Maruf Boran, Dursun Fırat Ergül, Umut Sabri Kasapoğlu, Leman Acun Delen, Erol Toy, Koray Altun, Tuna Albayrak, Hülya Yanal, Gizem Zaim, Volkan Yarar, Gökhan Kılınç, Mustafa Deniz, Esra Özdemir, Veysel Garani Soylu, Ayşe Yılmaz, Saba Mukaddes Saygılı, Ejder Kamil Öztürk, Begüm Ergan, Selin Eyüpoğlu, Yiğit Şahin, Beyza Yüksel, Azime Bulut, Aykut Sarıtaş, Hicret Yeniay, Mürşide Genç, Feyza Kargın, Osman Özcan, Ebru Karakoç, Ümran Karaca, Didem Sözütek, Sema Sarı, Nimet Şenoğlu, Hakan Aygün, Arzu Ceren Yiğit, Nilgün Kavruk, Çağdaş Alp Uzan, Murat Bıçakcıoğlu, Serkan Solak, Hatice Kutbay Özçelik, Kamuran Uluç, İlker Yıldırım, Makbule Cavidan Arar, İsmail Demirel, Soner Umut Küver, Eylem Sercan Özgür, Kutlay Aydın, Gül Erdal Dönmez, Gülbin Aygencel, Aliye Esmaoğlu, Berrak Sebil Aydın, Murat Emre Tokur, Pervin Korkmaz Ekren, Yusuf Aydemir, Başak Çakır Güney, Ömer Yavuz Erdil, Abdurrahman Tünay, Türkan Bahadır, Serkan Uçkun, Nazan Kocaoğlu, Hüseyin Ulaş Pınar, Nurcan Kutluer Karaca, Hamza Gültekin, Pınar Ayvat, Ayşe Belin Özer, Ahmet Eroğlu, Ufuk Kuyrukluyıldız, Çağdaş Baytar, Hilal Ayoğlu, Serpil Mızrakçı, Hatice Metin, Özgecan Pırıl Zanbak Mutlu, Hakan Yılmaz, Filiz Tüzüner","doi":"10.5152/ThoracResPract.2023.23024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>A 1-day point prevalence study was planned to obtain country data by determining the clinical characteristics, follow-up and treatment methods of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases that required intensive care unit (ICU) treatment in the second year of the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>All patients who were hospitalized in the ICUs due to COVID-19 between March 11, 2022, 08.00 am, and March 12, 2022, 08.00 am, were included in the study. Demographic characteristics, intensive care and laboratory data, radiological characteristics, and follow-up results of the patients were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 811 patients from 59 centers were included in the study, 59% of the cases were male, and the mean age was 74 ± 14 years. At least one comorbid disease was present in 94% of the cases, and hypertension was the most common. When ICU weight scores were examined, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-II: 19 (15-27) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment: 7 (4-10) were seen. Sepsis was present in 37% (n = 298) of cases. PaO2/FiO2 ratios of the patients were 190 the highest and 150 the lowest and 51% of the cases were followed via invasive mechanical ventilation. On the study day, 73% bilateral involvement was seen on chest x-ray, and ground-glass opacities (52%) were the most common on chest tomography. There was growth in culture in 40% (n = 318) of the cases, and the most common growth was in the tracheal aspirate (42%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The clinical course of COVID-19 is variable, and ICU follow-up was required due to advanced age, comorbidity, presence of respiratory symptoms, and widespread radiological involvement. The need for respiratory support and the presence of secondary infection are important issues to be considered in the follow-up. Despite the end of the second year of the pandemic and vaccination, the high severity of the disease as well as the need for follow-up in ICUs has shown that COVID-19 is an important health problem.COVID-19, intensive care, intensive care unit, pandemic, follow-up</p>","PeriodicalId":75221,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic research and practice","volume":" ","pages":"11 - 16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11160344/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/ThoracResPract.2023.23024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: A 1-day point prevalence study was planned to obtain country data by determining the clinical characteristics, follow-up and treatment methods of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases that required intensive care unit (ICU) treatment in the second year of the pandemic.

Material and methods: All patients who were hospitalized in the ICUs due to COVID-19 between March 11, 2022, 08.00 am, and March 12, 2022, 08.00 am, were included in the study. Demographic characteristics, intensive care and laboratory data, radiological characteristics, and follow-up results of the patients were recorded.

Results: A total of 811 patients from 59 centers were included in the study, 59% of the cases were male, and the mean age was 74 ± 14 years. At least one comorbid disease was present in 94% of the cases, and hypertension was the most common. When ICU weight scores were examined, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-II: 19 (15-27) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment: 7 (4-10) were seen. Sepsis was present in 37% (n = 298) of cases. PaO2/FiO2 ratios of the patients were 190 the highest and 150 the lowest and 51% of the cases were followed via invasive mechanical ventilation. On the study day, 73% bilateral involvement was seen on chest x-ray, and ground-glass opacities (52%) were the most common on chest tomography. There was growth in culture in 40% (n = 318) of the cases, and the most common growth was in the tracheal aspirate (42%).

Conclusion: The clinical course of COVID-19 is variable, and ICU follow-up was required due to advanced age, comorbidity, presence of respiratory symptoms, and widespread radiological involvement. The need for respiratory support and the presence of secondary infection are important issues to be considered in the follow-up. Despite the end of the second year of the pandemic and vaccination, the high severity of the disease as well as the need for follow-up in ICUs has shown that COVID-19 is an important health problem.COVID-19, intensive care, intensive care unit, pandemic, follow-up

Abstract Image

COVID-19大流行第二年重症监护病房随访患者的评估:一项多中心点患病率研究
目的:计划开展为期1天的点流行病学研究,通过确定疫情第二年需要重症监护病房(ICU)治疗的2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)病例的临床特征、随访和治疗方法,获取国家数据。材料和方法:所有在2022年3月11日上午08.00至2022年3月12日上午08.00期间因COVID-19住院的icu患者纳入研究。记录患者的人口学特征、重症监护和实验室资料、放射学特征和随访结果。结果:共纳入59个中心的811例患者,男性占59%,平均年龄74±14岁。94%的病例中至少存在一种合并症,其中高血压最为常见。当检查ICU体重评分时,急性生理和慢性健康评估- ii: 19(15-27)和顺序器官衰竭评估:7(4-10)。脓毒症出现在37% (n = 298)的病例中。患者PaO2/FiO2最高190,最低150,51%的患者行有创机械通气随访。在研究当天,73%的胸部x线片显示双侧受累,52%的胸部x线片显示磨玻璃影。40% (n = 318)的病例有培养物生长,最常见的生长在气管吸入液中(42%)。结论:COVID-19临床病程多变,由于患者年龄大、合并症多、出现呼吸道症状、影像学广泛受累,需进行ICU随访。需要呼吸支持和继发感染的存在是随访中需要考虑的重要问题。尽管大流行和疫苗接种的第二年已经结束,但疾病的高度严重性以及icu随访的必要性表明,COVID-19是一个重要的健康问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信