Realistic simulation and medical students' performance in the Advanced Cardiac Life Support course: a comparative study.

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Advances in Physiology Education Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-23 DOI:10.1152/advan.00113.2023
Débora L Coelho, Rosana C Amaral, Isabella C Silva, Ana Virgínia O B Oliveira, Augusto Scalabrini Neto, José Felippe P Silva, Julliane V Joviano-Santos
{"title":"Realistic simulation and medical students' performance in the Advanced Cardiac Life Support course: a comparative study.","authors":"Débora L Coelho, Rosana C Amaral, Isabella C Silva, Ana Virgínia O B Oliveira, Augusto Scalabrini Neto, José Felippe P Silva, Julliane V Joviano-Santos","doi":"10.1152/advan.00113.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical practice has benefited from new methodologies such as realistic simulation (RS). RS involves recreating lifelike scenarios to more accurately reflect real clinical practice, enhancing learners' skills and decision-making within controlled environments, and experiencing remarkable growth in medical education. However, RS requires substantial financial investments and infrastructure. Hence, it is essential to determine the effectiveness of RS in the development of skills among medical students, which will improve the allocation of resources while optimizing learning. This cross-sectional study was carried out in the simulation laboratory of a medical school, and the performance of students who underwent two different curriculum matrices (without RS and with RS, from 2021 to 2022) in the Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) course was compared. This test was chosen considering that the competencies involved in cardiac life support are essential, regardless of the medical specialty, and that ACLS is a set of life-saving protocols used worldwide. We observed that the impact of RS can be different for practical abilities when compared with the theoretical ones. There was no correlation between the general academic performance and students' grades reflecting the RS impact. We conclude that RS leads to less remediation and increased competence in practical skills. RS is an important learning strategy that allows repeating, reviewing, and discussing clinical practices without exposing the patient to risks.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Realistic simulation (RS) positively affected the performance of the students differently; it had more influence on practical abilities than theoretical knowledge. No correlation between the general academic performance and grades of the students without RS or with RS was found, providing evidence that RS is an important tool in Advanced Cardiac Life Support education.</p>","PeriodicalId":50852,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Physiology Education","volume":" ","pages":"61-68"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Physiology Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00113.2023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical practice has benefited from new methodologies such as realistic simulation (RS). RS involves recreating lifelike scenarios to more accurately reflect real clinical practice, enhancing learners' skills and decision-making within controlled environments, and experiencing remarkable growth in medical education. However, RS requires substantial financial investments and infrastructure. Hence, it is essential to determine the effectiveness of RS in the development of skills among medical students, which will improve the allocation of resources while optimizing learning. This cross-sectional study was carried out in the simulation laboratory of a medical school, and the performance of students who underwent two different curriculum matrices (without RS and with RS, from 2021 to 2022) in the Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) course was compared. This test was chosen considering that the competencies involved in cardiac life support are essential, regardless of the medical specialty, and that ACLS is a set of life-saving protocols used worldwide. We observed that the impact of RS can be different for practical abilities when compared with the theoretical ones. There was no correlation between the general academic performance and students' grades reflecting the RS impact. We conclude that RS leads to less remediation and increased competence in practical skills. RS is an important learning strategy that allows repeating, reviewing, and discussing clinical practices without exposing the patient to risks.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Realistic simulation (RS) positively affected the performance of the students differently; it had more influence on practical abilities than theoretical knowledge. No correlation between the general academic performance and grades of the students without RS or with RS was found, providing evidence that RS is an important tool in Advanced Cardiac Life Support education.

现实模拟与医学生在高级心脏生命支持(ACLS)课程中的表现:比较研究。
临床实践受益于新的方法,如现实模拟(RS)。RS包括重现逼真的场景,以更准确地反映真实的临床实践,在受控环境中提高学习者的技能和决策能力,体验医学教育的显着增长。然而,RS需要大量的财政投资和基础设施。因此,确定RS在医学生技能发展中的有效性至关重要,这将在优化学习的同时改善资源配置。这项横断面研究是在一所医学院的模拟实验室进行的,比较了在高级心脏生命支持(ACLS)课程中接受两种不同课程矩阵(从2021年到2022年,不接受RS和接受RS)的学生的表现。选择这项测试是考虑到心脏生命支持所涉及的能力是必不可少的,无论医学专业和ACLS是一套世界范围内使用的救生方案。我们观察到RS对实践能力的影响与理论能力的影响不同。一般学习成绩与学生成绩之间没有相关关系,反映了RS的影响。我们得出结论,RS导致更少的补救和提高能力的实用技能。RS是一种重要的学习策略,允许重复、回顾和讨论临床实践,而不会使患者暴露于风险中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
19.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Physiology Education promotes and disseminates educational scholarship in order to enhance teaching and learning of physiology, neuroscience and pathophysiology. The journal publishes peer-reviewed descriptions of innovations that improve teaching in the classroom and laboratory, essays on education, and review articles based on our current understanding of physiological mechanisms. Submissions that evaluate new technologies for teaching and research, and educational pedagogy, are especially welcome. The audience for the journal includes educators at all levels: K–12, undergraduate, graduate, and professional programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信